Thanks, indeed it all works as expected without using rollback().
I had cases of onException().handled(true)rollback().end() that could be
simplified to onException()end().
On 31.03.2017 17:10, Quinn Stevenson wrote:
I don’t this this would make sense for handling java.lang.Exception
I don’t this this would make sense for handling java.lang.Exception - I think
you’re right about Camel doing the same action by default.
I guess if there was some other exception you were handling (i.e.
handled(true)), you may want to call rollback - but I can’t think of a really
good example
Hi
Wanted to ask, what would be a reason to explicitly call rollback() in an
onException().
For example, would this make sense?
.onException(Exception.class).rollback().end()
I'm under the expression above line could just be left out, as Camel anyway
lets
the exception up and that will
