How did you stop the consumer, I'm not sure if the consumer still hold the first message when you stop the consumer. What kind of JMS ACKNOWLEDGE did you use?
-- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English) http://jnn.javaeye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: willemjiang On Friday, September 28, 2012 at 2:43 PM, mikeplanamente wrote: > Hi all, > > my environment: > > servicemix 4.3.1 fuse 02-05 > java 1.6.0_07 > camel 2.6 fuse 02-05 > activemq 5.4.2.fuse-04-05 > > I've a strange problem: > > I have a single monothreadded camel route using camel activemq component to > consume messages from a AMQ queue. > > case 1: > consumer is stopped, the queue is filled with messages then the consumer is > started -> all messages are read in the right order EXCEPTED the first that > is consumed at THE END! > In other words, the second message and the next ones are first consumed > then, once all others have been processed the first message in the queue is > consumed! > > case2: > the consumer is started, messages are injected in the queue -> all messages > are processed in the right order, as expected. > > maybe you already had such a problem? > > in advance, many thanks to you all for your support and ideas... > > Michael. > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/activeMQ-reading-order-problem-tp5720172.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com > (http://Nabble.com).
