Thanks, Neal. This is my first foray into Pulsar, so you are probably
right.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 3:34 PM Neal Feierabend wrote:
> Hello Steve,
>
> I'm a relative novice with both Pulsar and Camel so I could be completely
> wrong, but I wonder if this may have more to do with Pulsar than
Hello Steve,
I'm a relative novice with both Pulsar and Camel so I could be completely
wrong, but I wonder if this may have more to do with Pulsar than Camel.
What kind of hardware are you testing on? Most of the benchmarks I've seen
that talk about 1 million or more messages/second are usually
Thanks, Claus. I have also tried Kafka in my app for comparison purposes,
and it seems to be a little bit more performant.
I saw something called Starlight for JMS that does JMS over Pulsar, and
gets about a million messages per second. I'm considering writing a camel
component for that. Im
Hi
I think camel-pulsar does an ACK per message at the end of routing.
Then the performance may become slower.
kafka uses async commit every 5 sec in the background (by default).
for camel-pulsar you can also use manual ack, and then find a way to batch
acks.
But maybe there is a way in pulsar
Hello. I have been experimenting with the Camel Pulsar component as a more
performant alternative to traditional JMS brokers. I have seen performance
comparisons that set Pulsar even above Kafka in most cases. It is reported
that Pulsar can handle (~3.5) millions of messages per second. In my
