Re: camel caching producers

2011-03-09 Thread Marco Crivellaro
ge in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-caching-producers-tp3412417p3415537.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: camel caching producers

2011-03-07 Thread Claus Ibsen
tempFileName=${file:name.noext}.tmp And hence it can be the same for them all. > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-caching-producers-tp3412417p3412698.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.c

Re: camel caching producers

2011-03-07 Thread Marco Crivellaro
thanks, the temporary file name we use is also dinamic, which is the Exchange header to set the tempFileName uri property? -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-caching-producers-tp3412417p3412698.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at

Re: camel caching producers

2011-03-07 Thread Claus Ibsen
the filename as a header, instead from the url, and use the re-usable ftp endpoint. This has been discussed before on the forum, so you could maybe google and read some of those threads. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-caching-producer

Re: camel caching producers

2011-03-07 Thread Marco Crivellaro
problem is I am using a recipientList to serve our endpoints as we are not serving only FTP endpoints. any way to limit LRU cache? -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-caching-producers-tp3412417p3412665.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive

Re: camel caching producers

2011-03-07 Thread Claus Ibsen
ontext: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-caching-producers-tp3412417p3412643.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Claus Ibsen - FuseSource Email: cib...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blo

Re: camel caching producers

2011-03-07 Thread Marco Crivellaro
that means that if I need to deliver to 1000 distinct ftp servers I should expect space to be allocated even if they are used just once? Isn't there a way to get the garbage collected? -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-caching-producers-tp3412417p34

Re: camel caching producers

2011-03-07 Thread Claus Ibsen
I can see the number of FTPClient, FTPConfiguration, FTPOperations, > FTPEndpoint and ListenerList growing constantly. > > Each exchange I run has a distinct endpoint URI > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-caching-producers-tp3412417

Re: camel caching producers

2011-03-07 Thread Marco Crivellaro
context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-caching-producers-tp3412417p3412637.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: camel caching producers

2011-03-07 Thread Marco Crivellaro
thanks a lot! -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-caching-producers-tp3412417p3412449.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: camel caching producers

2011-03-07 Thread Claus Ibsen
mel is caching producers. > I am running a huge amount of deliveries to distinct endpoints, is there a > way to limit the amount of producers cached? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/camel-caching-producers-tp3412417p3412417.html > Sent

camel caching producers

2011-03-07 Thread Marco Crivellaro
27.n5.nabble.com/camel-caching-producers-tp3412417p3412417.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.