Thanks a lot mr. O'Day for the correction, and thanks to everyone else for
the time taken to answer my question :-D
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/concurrentConsumers-basic-question-tp4535789p4539262.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archi
x27;Day
IT Consultant -http://consulting-notes.com
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/concurrentConsumers-basic-question-tp4535789p4537024.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If you want multiple consumers on topics you might take a look at virtual
topics.
My guess is that these can have multiple consumers. Correct me if i'm wrong.
/preben
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/concurrentConsumers-basic-question-tp4535789p4536257
opics, because this will result in multiple copies of
the same message*.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/concurrentConsumers-basic-question-tp4535789p4535971.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
; Thanks for the advice. However, the activemq:accounting queue is still
> getting the message more than once, is this the normal behavior of the
> concurrentConsumers config???
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/concurrentConsumers-basic-question-tp4535789p4535904.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
mq:accounting queue is still
getting the message more than once, is this the normal behavior of the
concurrentConsumers config???
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/concurrentConsumers-basic-question-tp4535789p4535904.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
vemq:topic:xmlOrders").to("activemq:production");
Regards,
Ngoc Hai
--- On Thu, 6/30/11, rogelio_sevilla1 wrote:
> From: rogelio_sevilla1
> Subject: concurrentConsumers basic question
> To: users@camel.apache.org
> Date: Thursday, June 30, 2011, 12:08 AM
> Hello everyone, sorry
hreads even if they are
not needed??, what's the correct usage of concurrentConsumers??
Sorry if this is too basic, and thanks for your time :-D
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/concurrentConsumers-basic-question-tp4535789p4535789.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
