Re: tracing large messages

2011-10-22 Thread Claus Ibsen
20.10.2011 17:09, schrieb Mond Raymond: >> >>  I think the point is that showBody should be false or at least limited in >>> length by default >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.** >>> com/tracing-

Re: tracing large messages

2011-10-20 Thread Christian Müller
>> -- >> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.** >> com/tracing-large-messages-**tp4921360p4921789.html<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/tracing-large-messages-tp4921360p4921789.html> >> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Na

Re: tracing large messages

2011-10-20 Thread David Karlsen
log headers) That > seems a little more intuitive to me, but that's my opinion. > > Dan > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Ray > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/tracing-large-messages-tp4921360p4921 > > > 360.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org > http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend - http://www.talend.com >

Re: tracing large messages

2011-10-20 Thread Christian Schneider
Am 20.10.2011 17:09, schrieb Mond Raymond: I think the point is that showBody should be false or at least limited in length by default -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/tracing-large-messages-tp4921360p4921789.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list

Re: tracing large messages

2011-10-20 Thread Mond Raymond
I think the point is that showBody should be false or at least limited in length by default -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/tracing-large-messages-tp4921360p4921789.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: tracing large messages

2011-10-20 Thread Claus Ibsen
gt; People can then use -1 or 0 for no limit. >>> Fell free to create a JIRA. And also work on a patch :) >> >> I would say -1 for no limit and 0 for no body.  (just log headers)   That >> seems a little more intuitive to me, but that's my opinion. >> >>

Re: tracing large messages

2011-10-20 Thread Matt Pavlovich
little more intuitive to me, but that's my opinion. > > Dan > > > >> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Ray >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/tracing-large-messages-tp4921360p4921 >>> 360.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org > http://dankulp.com/blog > Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: tracing large messages

2011-10-20 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
patch :) I would say -1 for no limit and 0 for no body. (just log headers) That seems a little more intuitive to me, but that's my opinion. Dan Thoughts? Cheers Ray -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/tracing-large-messages-tp4921360p4921 360.html Sen

Re: tracing large messages

2011-10-20 Thread Daniel Kulp
to create a JIRA. And also work on a patch :) I would say -1 for no limit and 0 for no body. (just log headers) That seems a little more intuitive to me, but that's my opinion. Dan > > > Thoughts? > > > > Cheers > > > > Ray > > > > -- >

Re: tracing large messages

2011-10-20 Thread Claus Ibsen
But yeah maybe the maxChars default should be 1 or something. People can then use -1 or 0 for no limit. Fell free to create a JIRA. And also work on a patch :) > Thoughts? > > Cheers > > Ray > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com

Re: tracing large messages

2011-10-20 Thread Claus Ibsen
is message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/tracing-large-messages-tp4921360p4921360.html > Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Claus Ibsen - FuseSource Email: cib...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davs

tracing large messages

2011-10-20 Thread Mond Raymond
, shouldn't there be a limit (10k, 100k or whatever) which is the default beyond which bodies will not be printed, unless configured explicitly ... this would prevent users shooting off their feet. Thoughts? Cheers Ray -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/tracing-