Hi
I have created the ticket
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2467
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 2:54 PM, mcrive wrote:
>>
>> Is attaching the patch a must have? :)
>>
>
> No but everyone have to help in the community with what you
Not sure if SMX has somethin like this, but I'd like to be able to access the
root folder (hard drive path e.g. c:\\mysmxdirectory) in which SMX is
deploy.
IS there an environment var for this?
How can u access/use it in a camel application?
rgds.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.n
L.S.,
This information is available as a Java System property:
- for ServiceMIx 3.2.x/3.3.x/4.0, the system property is called servicemix.home
- for later versions of Servicemix (based on Felix Karaf), the
property name to use id karaf.base
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
Open
Attached is a small sample test case. I see you have already resolved
CAMEL-2456 which was written for the exception when trying to send to a
temporary queue. Does this also solve the problem in this test case where
the message is sent to the wrong temporary queue?
Here is what the test does:
I'll write a patch and submit it sometime this week.
On Feb 13, 2010, at 4:15 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have created the ticket
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2467
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 2:54 PM, mcrive wro
Thanks for your response.
Just one more question.
Will the line below resolve to the intended values?
1)
2)
${karaf.home}/data/conf/mysettings.properties
Sample 1 should get the value of request-queue from a properties file.
Sample 1 is the beginning of a camel route
Samp
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Tracy Snell wrote:
> I'll write a patch and submit it sometime this week.
>
Fantastic that is great news.
> On Feb 13, 2010, at 4:15 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I have created the ticket
>> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2467
>>
>> On Fr
Hi Willem,
The link is still broken.
Did you get a response from Hadrian regarding the manual upload of 2.1.0?
Did you get an answer to the delta between 2.0.0 PDF vs. 2.1.0 PDF?
Thanks,
Jason
willem.jiang wrote:
>
> /U wrote:
>> Thanks Hadrian. Is there a chance you could upload it today?
Hi /U,
The link is still broken.
Did you get a response from Hadrian regarding the manual upload of 2.1.0?
Did you get an answer to the delta between 2.0.0 PDF vs. 2.1.0 PDF?
Thanks,
Jason
/U wrote:
>
> Thanks Hadrian. Is there a chance you could upload it today?
> Is there a significant de
