Read the FAQ
http://camel.apache.org/why-do-my-message-lose-its-headers-during-routing.html
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Mark Webb wrote:
> I am passing a message through a series of Processors and in the
> course of this processing I am setting header information in the
> Message objects. I
See this FAQ
http://camel.apache.org/using-getin-or-getout-methods-on-exchange.html
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Mark Webb wrote:
> I am sending messages through a Camel route in ActiveMQ. My message
> reaches the end of the processing chain, and at the last processor I
> call exchange.setOu
Hi Loririn
I think you/we have to step back. We have other users in the past
running with SFTP with no problems at all. Also fetching files
recursively.
So I wonder if we should revert back and keep the old logic!
1)
Is this the first time you use camel-ftp?
2)
What OS and FTP server are you usi
Hi
We had some reports about some FTP servers not being able to download
files if you refer to the files using paths.
So we changed the logic to use a pattern where Camel will cd the
path(s) first and then issue the download.
The problem seems to be related to SFTP but if you use FTP then you
are
Hi, I've started using groovy + camel for doing various small batch
jobs like moving a set of messages from one jms queue to another, and I
have a usecase I think would be nice to have covered within the DSL if
possible:
An option to shutdown the route (and possibly the context) if a spesific
num
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Tarjei Huse wrote:
> Hi, I've started using groovy + camel for doing various small batch
> jobs like moving a set of messages from one jms queue to another, and I
> have a usecase I think would be nice to have covered within the DSL if
> possible:
>
> An option to
On 10/2/10 1:33 PM, Scott Christopher wrote:
On 02/10/2010, at 1:18 AM, Ashwin Karpe wrote:
Not sure why setting the address attribute in the spring.xml file does not
change the address for you since that is the value that overrides the WSDL
address... I know that it works!!!
My apologies, th
On 02/10/2010, at 9:05 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
> On 10/2/10 1:33 PM, Scott Christopher wrote:
>> On 02/10/2010, at 1:18 AM, Ashwin Karpe wrote:
>>
>>> Not sure why setting the address attribute in the spring.xml file does not
>>> change the address for you since that is the value that overrides t
Hi Scott,
I just checked the schema of cxfEndpoint, it doesn't support the
publishedEndpointUrl.
I filled a JIRA[1] for it.
[1]https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-3190
On 10/2/10 8:33 PM, Scott Christopher wrote:
On 02/10/2010, at 9:05 PM, Willem Jiang wrote:
On 10/2/10 1:33 PM
HI Ashwin,
I will try using replyTo. I will say, though, I have successfully
used JMS routes in the past that look like what I had there (with no
replyTo), and the response of the consuming end would be routed back
as a response. But it was synchronous (I was using direct: for the
initial produc
See these pages
http://camel.apache.org/asynchronous-routing-engine.html
http://camel.apache.org/asynchronous-processing.html
The SEDA component will most likely be improved in Camel 3.0 to
leverage the async routing engine to the fullest.
We opted to not change it during 2.x as it would break cur
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi Loririn
>
> I think you/we have to step back. We have other users in the past
> running with SFTP with no problems at all. Also fetching files
> recursively.
> So I wonder if we should revert back and keep the old logic!
Btw this didn't come
Hi
I will try to reproduce the issue with the help of Apache SSHD as
simulating the SFTP server. It's not like a real server but it may
help and in the future catch regression bugs.
I got the first simple test up and running by uploading a file.
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Claus Ibsen wrot
Oops, my bad. In case, there is no replyTo and there is an outgoing message
in the exchange, a temporary queue is used by ActiveMQ to propagate the
response.
So in my earlier response point (2) is not entirely accurate.
However point (3) is accurate. Please check out my attached samples and the
Claus! I totally missed the Async Engine page and the list of
'supported components'. I'll try out 2.5 snapshot to see if I can get
JMS to work. I see you've already done the hard work of making JMS
work https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2970
And Ashwin, thanks for the continued
Thanks so much Claus, Ashwin, and the folks in IRC over the past 2
days. It works with 2.5!
The code I used is below. I put this up on my blog for others, as well.
Route and Inline Consumer
// whenever message is sent to a.test, our AsyncProcessor defined
here will fire
from("jms:queue:a.t
16 matches
Mail list logo
