Dear all,
for a legacy project we're working with Apache Servicemix 7.0.1. This contains
Camel 2.16.5.
While trying to use the claimCheck pattern I'm getting
org.springframework.beans.factory.xml.XmlBeanDefinitionStoreException: Line 106
in XML document from URL
[bundle://425.8:0/META-INF/spr
No, ClaimCheck has been introduced in 2.21.0
Il giorno mar 1 set 2020 alle ore 14:47 Gerald Kallas
ha scritto:
> Dear all,
>
> for a legacy project we're working with Apache Servicemix 7.0.1. This
> contains Camel 2.16.5.
>
> While trying to use the claimCheck pattern I'm getting
>
> org.springf
Hi
claimCheck has been introduced on Camel 2.21, so it’s not available on
ServiceMix.
Any chance to update to Karaf with Camel 2.x+ ?
In the discussion we had on SMX, I proposed to cut a SMX release with updated
versions before moving the project to the attic.
Regards
JB
> Le 1 sept. 2020 à
Hi Gerald,
There may be a solution while waiting for the last release of ServiceMix.
I run ServiceMix 7.0.1 with Camel 2.17.7, with little changes.
(i make a little test in LAB this morning, with 2.21.1 and it seems to work).
ServiceMix cames up without error.
Here's a Link that explained the
Actually, ServiceMix is just a Karaf custom distribution.
So, updating etc/org.apache.karaf.features.cfg with Camel 2.21.1 should work.
Even simpler, just create your own Karaf distribution ;)
Regards
JB
> Le 1 sept. 2020 à 15:52, Daniel Langevin a
> écrit :
>
> Hi Gerald,
>
>
> There may
i'm using sjms-batch consumer with activemq, when consuming around 1.5 million
messages, the last 400 or so messages seemed to be always stuck in the queue.
nothing is going on with them, any ideas what could have caused such behavior?
thanks
Yeah, TomEE could provide the "java:/TransactionManager" since it is a J2EE
container. I wonder if you use the "transacted=true" option on the sjms
consumer which will rollback the transaction if the router is failed.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 4:35 AM Shultz, Dmitry
wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Z
FYI, I just raised https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/4151 to backport
the fix of CAMEL-14918 to 3.4.x. Also I test the "transacted=true" which
the sjms consumer that the message will be sent to the DLQ after the error
handler is exhausted. Is this what you expected ?
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:09
