Hello Jane,
you say you don't have an attachment, did you make sure you got at least a
message body ???
Because the problem may come from the PollEnrich.
Regards,
Daniel
-Message d'origine-
De : Mi Jane 米静
Envoyé : 1 septembre 2022 00:31
À : users@camel.apache.org
Objet : RE: Poll
Hi Jane,
I make a little test with my environment Camel version 3.14.3 running into
karaf 4.3.3
Here a simple rest service extract from a blueprint deployment and it works
very well, with and without an attachment
TTT - Poll imap read With PollEnrich
imaps://{{SHQ_imap_s
Dear Camel Community,
We ran into a deadlock when concurrently adding and removing routes.
We're dynamically adding and removing routes, whose (ftp) consumers
sometimes take a longer time to start up, and observed the following:
* (Default/Abstract)CamelContext.addRoutes ->
DefaultCamelContext.a
Hi
Do you own locking if you do concurrent model changes to Camel
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 6:21 PM Gerda Ilger wrote:
> Dear Camel Community,
>
> We ran into a deadlock when concurrently adding and removing routes.
>
> We're dynamically adding and removing routes, whose (ftp) consumers
> sometime
Hi Daniel,
you say you don't have an attachment, did you make sure you got at least a
message body ???
Because the problem may come from the PollEnrich.
Jane: Yes. I got the message body but no attachment. It's working well if I use
only mail consumer, no matter which version of camel. The prob
Hello Team,
I've posted a question on the chat a while back but still no answer. Can
someone, please help with that?
routeTemplate("test-template")
.from("timer://foo?fixedRate=true&period=6")
.log(LoggingLevel.INFO, "templated route")
interceptFrom().log(LoggingLevel.INFO, "interceptor tri
Hi
Can you try testing with 3.18.x
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:41 PM Mi Jane 米静
wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> When I used Camel 3.11, poll enrich with mail component worked well and I
> could get the mail attachments.
> When I changed to Camel 3.16 for other reasons, I could get the mail but I
>
You can also just use onExceptionOccurred processor and do any custom
logging from java code in the processor if you are attempting to do some
custom logging via onException
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 12:41 PM Jozef Bouda
wrote:
> Thank you, Claus. Using handled=false returns to aplication log fail
Hi
It does not make as much sense to use intercept in templates as intercept
is really for global scoped
https://camel.apache.org/components/3.18.x/eips/intercept.html
Also its a feature that is complex and a candidate for removal to make the
DSL and routing engine better.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022
@Nikolay What are you trying to accomplish functionally?
On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 8:02 AM Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> It does not make as much sense to use intercept in templates as intercept
> is really for global scoped
> https://camel.apache.org/components/3.18.x/eips/intercept.html
>
> Also it
Hi Claus,
Yes, we're now doing our own locking - essentially just straightening
out the order of locks Camel will need later on in our code.
It feels wrong, though: CamelContext is already putting a lot of
effort into protecting addRoutes/removeRoute-calls.
Streamlining the order in which locks ar
11 matches
Mail list logo