I have a CXF configuration (in applicationContext.xml) that talks to
IBM MQ via JNDI resources.
I'd like to use this cxf-configured message queue as a Camel destination.
I'm stuck on the difference between
org.apache.cxf.transport.jms.JMSConfiguration and
org.apache.camel.component.jms.JmsConfigur
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Christian Schneider
wrote:
> Hi Jeffrey,
[...]
> So if you only want one source of jms configuration then you best chance is
> to use the camel config. On the other hand you can also have it redundant
> and use properties for each param you want to configure.
>
> Ch
> Did you also route the cxf service over a camel route using the camel
> transport for cxf? This is not visible in the excerpt you send.
I did not (explicitly) use camel transport for CXF.
I simply have the in my applicationContext.xml, which I
bundled into a WAR file which I then deployed to W
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Christian Schneider
wrote:
> Ok so you did not really need a CXF Endpoint for your current project but
> only wanted to have a camel JMS config
> based on a CXF JMS config? I thought you wanted CXF and Camel to work both
> on the same jms config.
I understood you w
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Christian Schneider
wrote:
> [...] If you want to take the time and build an example this will surely be
> added to the distro.
I have the beginnings of an end-to-end sample using Camel in a WAR
deployed to WebSphere. It reads files form a folder and uses JNDI
re
> You should upload it somewhere and then send the link with a request for feed
> back to the list. Perhaps one of the free file hosters will do.
Please give me feedback on this work-in-progress JNDI example. I think
this example would be useful for those integrating with WebSphere /
JNDI:
http:/
> So my question is why don´t you simply use an ActiveMQConnectionFactory in
> spring and skip all the JNDI stuff. I have done some deployments in an
> enterprise environment
> and we most times did not use jndi
Very strict client corporate/enterprise requirements that resources be managed
in
Using the XML configuration, is it possible to make namespace agnostic ?
Rather than this Camel config (which works, since the XML has an
explicit namespace):
http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring";
xmlns:my="http://my.namespace";>
[...]
//my:files
I'd rather ignore the namespace in
I've done some work on it recently but haven't gotten all the Mina 2 changes in.
On Mar 1, 2011, at 17:12, Christian Müller wrote:
> I'm the ticket holder... ;-)
>
> Currently we have some trouble to upgrade to Mina 2.0.2. There are some API
> changes and a few unit tests still fail. I think
Try under .
The parser isn't understanding where "" comes from.
-Jeff
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:59 PM, lone squirrely
wrote:
> For some reason it didn't like the XML:
>
>
> http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
> xm
Hello
Can anyone point me in the right direction for how to configure auth settings
for Confluent schema registry with the Kafka component ?
I checked the code [1] and I see “schemaRegistryUrl” but no authentications
option for it.
I suspect I need “schema.registry.basic.auth.user.inf
reaks inserted for readability]
On 8/11/22, 02:36, "Jeffrey Knight" wrote:
Hello
Can anyone point me in the right direction for how to configure auth
settings for Confluent schema registry with the Kafka component ?
I checked the code [1] and I see “schemaRegistryUrl” bu
12 matches
Mail list logo
