Thanks Sanjeev for the Info.
How would be the setup on an inline setup ? Public would move to the
external firewall right ?
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Sanjeev Neelarapu <
sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hi Bjoern,
>
> Public VLAN will not be configured by CS. Admin has to configure
Hi Bjoern,
Public VLAN will not be configured by CS. Admin has to configure public vlan
and assign one IP belongs to that vlan on F5 public interface manually.
-Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: BJO ERN [mailto:bjoern.tei...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 8:22 AM
To: user
H Lisa,
this sounds like a bug. The systemvm should be marked as stopped. You
can do this yourself in the db as a workaround. I don't know the best
practice for volumes.
regards,
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Lisa B. wrote:
> Hey!
> I use CS 4.2 and XenServer 6.2
> I have had this issue seve
On 12-Nov-2013, at 6:46 PM, Geoff Higginbottom
wrote:
> Answers inline
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pentium100 [mailto:pentium...@gmail.com]
>
Hi,
CloudStack Bangalore community is presenting at Open Source India
(OSI)Conference 2013, today.
The agenda is:
CloudStack for Beginners , by Iliyas Shirol, Cloud/BigData Evangelist, InMobi
Hacking CloudStack with DevCloud, by Rajesh Battala, Apache CloudStack
Committer and Hacker
The deta
Hi Guys,
who did setup a external load balancer in cloudstack ?
I setup a F5 with an assigned network offering and finally got the guest
VLAN/pool provisioning working.
But I noticed that a public VLAN was not created on the F5, so how would
the public traffic reach the device if not inline ? I ba
Additional Log Line
2013-11-13T00:20:29.202Z [FFB7B6D0 info 'Libs' opID=SWI-a3d84e8d] OBJLIB-FILEBE
: FileBEIoctl: ioctl operation failed on
'/vmfs/volumes/ec1e6239-8a1a0a26/i-2-206-VM/5d862114e7b144b79473f32c75043362-flat.vmdk'
: Inappropriate ioctl for device (1638402)
2013-11-13T00:20:38.31
I have a problem that developed when creating some new templates for vSphere.
When using the create template function it kicks off the "Export OVF and hangs
"In Progress" in vcenter. The vpxa.log on the host has the following, anyone
know what may be causing this? I have tried restarting the m
On 12.11.2013 17:50, Carlos Miranda Molina (Mstaaravin) wrote:
WARN [kvm.discoverer.LibvirtServerDiscoverer] (catalina-exec-5:)
can't
setup agent, due to java.io.IOException: Password authentication
failed. -
Password authentication failed.
WARN [cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl] (catalina
On 12.11.2013 20:09, David Matteson wrote:
Hello,
Looking in JIRA I didn't see one ticket describing all the problems
we have with the Cloudstack UI in Chrome; the login form only works
intermittently, most of the views (Instances, Service Offerings, etc.)
don't work properly, and in general it
I do know Chrome is 100% compatible with the latest UI (I use Chrome as my
primary browser for development in CloudStack), but it is also very aggressive
with caching (even more so than IE in some cases!). After an
upgrade/installation which contains UI updates, you may want to clear out all
ca
In light of the other reports of Chrome working, I would just do part of
what I suggested - look for hints in the logs to see what specific
problems are occurring.
I would also check it on other workstations and from other network
locations, if that is possible, to see if the problem is restri
When I installed CS 4.2.0 I experienced exactly what Davis is describing so
I though that Chrome won't be an option, but soon after working with
Firefox and IE I tried again and it just worked fine.
Maybe some caches? I've also tried Chrome on my Mac (Mountain Lion) tonight
and it also works fine.
I'm using Chrome to hit our UI and don't have any problems with it logging in
or problems with any of the views.
It's worked fine since our initial install of 4.0.0-incubating and on all
upgrades since without any problems, on 4.2.0 now.
I've also pulled in the latest UI changes from the curren
You could tell them that Chrome doesn't support the CloudStack UI.
That might put it in a better light!
You should at least file a JIRA with some specific examples and any
errors reported in the Chrome console or system logs. At least it will
tell people that it needs to be fixed and give them
Hello,
Looking in JIRA I didn't see one ticket describing all the problems we
have with the Cloudstack UI in Chrome; the login form only works
intermittently, most of the views (Instances, Service Offerings, etc.)
don't work properly, and in general it just seems broken.
In Firefox, however,
Hello!
I have a clean installation of Cloudstack in my local laboratory, i have
configured: Zone, Pod & Cluster
http://i.imgur.com/0o32L3D.png
But i can't add host
logs (in management server) show me this:
INFO [cloud.api.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-18:) Unable to add the host
INFO [cloud.ha.H
Le 12/11/2013 16:39, Lennert den Teuling a ecrit :
Op 12 november 2013 om 16:32 schreef Milamber :
Hello,
Before the 4.2.1 release, don't hesitate to translate your CS
localization (4.2.xmessages.properties).
https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/CloudStack_UI/
French is 100% translated
Japa
> Op 12 november 2013 om 16:32 schreef Milamber :
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Before the 4.2.1 release, don't hesitate to translate your CS
> localization (4.2.xmessages.properties).
>
> https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/CloudStack_UI/
>
> French is 100% translated
> Japanese : 99%
> Chinese (China) :
Hello,
Before the 4.2.1 release, don't hesitate to translate your CS
localization (4.2.xmessages.properties).
https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/CloudStack_UI/
French is 100% translated
Japanese : 99%
Chinese (China) : 98%
Korean (Korea) : 96%
Portuguese (Brazil) : 96%
Russian (Russia) 94%
Hello,
I am wondering is there a way to get the usage records list by virtual machine
id instead of account
Steve,
One option is to also assign VMs from each Tier to a separate Isolated Network,
and then use the Standard VR for Remote VPN access
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From:
Answers inline
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Pentium100 [mailto:pentium...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 November 2013 11:22
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Fwd: A few que
On 12-Nov-2013, at 5:49 pm, Lennert den Teuling wrote:
>
>
>> Op 12 november 2013 om 13:04 schreef Shanker Balan
>> :
>>
>>
>> Comments inline.
>>
>> On 12-Nov-2013, at 5:16 pm, Lennert den Teuling wrote:
>>
Op 12 november 2013 om 2:18 schreef Nick Wales :
Thanks Lennert.
>>>
> Op 12 november 2013 om 13:04 schreef Shanker Balan
> :
>
>
> Comments inline.
>
> On 12-Nov-2013, at 5:16 pm, Lennert den Teuling wrote:
>
> >> Op 12 november 2013 om 2:18 schreef Nick Wales :
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks Lennert.
> >>
> >> My issue isn't around the state of the VR as such, we've
Anyone?
Steve Searles
Director, Network Operations
Zimcom Internet Solutions, Inc.
http://www.zimcom.net
Phone. (513)231-9500
Fax. (513)624-3909
Toll Free. (888)624-3910
-Original Message-
From: Steve Searles [mailto:ssear...@zimcom.net]
Sent: Friday, November 8, 2013 11:24 PM
To: user
Hello,
I am trying out Cloudstack for use in our cloud. However, I have some
questions about it:
1. Is it possible to let the user set the CPU/RAM for a virtual machine
instead of fized "offerings"? We are charging the user for each
CPU/gigabyte, so he/she should be able to specify those resource
Comments inline.
On 12-Nov-2013, at 5:16 pm, Lennert den Teuling wrote:
>> Op 12 november 2013 om 2:18 schreef Nick Wales :
>>
>>
>> Thanks Lennert.
>>
>> My issue isn't around the state of the VR as such, we've destroyed and
>> brought back plenty with no issue, more so the impact it going down
> Op 12 november 2013 om 2:18 schreef Nick Wales :
>
>
> Thanks Lennert.
>
> My issue isn't around the state of the VR as such, we've destroyed and
> brought back plenty with no issue, more so the impact it going down will
> have on my instances.
>
> We're looking at consolidation ratios of 40
Ashley,
Sounds like a nice workaround.
I assume you install a VPN appliance in each Tier?
Have you had any problems with the VPNs traversing the different Tiers and
effectively breaking the VPC isolation model?
Have you created a 'template' for the StrongSwan VM or do you need to install
it fo
Hi Steve,
We use CentOS with StrongSwan VPN Server installed. You need to assign a extra
WAN IP and enable static nat to the VPN Server. This gives us Site to site VPN,
Remote access VPN, port forwarding etc. We are using CS 4.02
It has been reliable
-Original Message-
From: Steve Se
31 matches
Mail list logo
