Hi all,
I find I am unable to attach volume to VM while VM is running.The error
message is show below:
Failed to attach volume: volume-1 to VM: standard-ubuntu;
org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unable to execute QEMU command
'device_add': Duplicate ID 'virtio-disk1' for device
The VM
ssh -i ~/.ssh/private_key -p 3922 root@local-link-address
2013/11/25 Nick nick.ch...@kland.com.tw
Hello All
请教一下，management是如何去确认SSVM是否有起来的呢？？
透过SSH吗？？那是透过那一个IP？Public IP or Private IP or Link Local IP
Address.
在WEB UI都己经看到Console Proxy VM Secondary Storage VM already running。
这个应该就是我说的linux 3.*的udev问题。
在 2013年11月25日上午9:48，Du Jun dj199...@gmail.com写道：
Hi ZHOU,
如果我先stop虚拟机，再挂载volume，然后再启动虚拟机，那么一切都ok的。就是不能在虚拟机运行的时候挂载。或者我虚拟机第一次启动的时候，我挂载上去，那也是ok的，但是我卸载掉volume然后再挂载，那就会报错“Duplicate
ID 'virtio-disk1”。
我通过libvirt来查看VM 的XML信息如下：
root@openstack-server-1:/usr/bin# virsh
cloudmonkeyISO??deploy
virtualmachine serviceofferingid=133e6e18-3bc7-4743-b7ef-2b791fb7d7ad
templateid=3d9b86b4-2dfb-4178-8765-f1099b28747b
zoneid=dba8d8fe-dc8e-4418-a5ea-97407afd95f2 name=testvm
??: Installing
楼上两个大神！赞！！
在 2013年11月25日下午4:40，Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com写道：
对的。安全组是针对shared network的，防火墙是针对isolated network
在 2013年11月25日上午4:11，tanthalas tanthalas...@hotmail.com写道：
我理解VPC是这样的
通过一个VR实现多个vlan隔离，属于隔离网络，不是shared 网络，是不需要安全组功能的。
刘宇超 Richard Liu
发件人： Du Jun
发送时间：
这个指令，我在KVM上下达，是可登入，没有问题
但在management server 上，并没有local-link-address，所以也就无法登入
不知是我哪个地方错了，为什么在management server上没有local-link-address
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Du Jun [mailto:dj199...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 4:52 PM
To: users-cn
Subject: Re: management
cloudmonkey里面可以设置这个参数
2013/11/25 高手 847875...@qq.com
使用cloudmonkey创建虚拟机的时候，从模板的话好创建，如果是从ISO创建的话该怎么创建？使用命令：deploy virtualmachine
serviceofferingid=133e6e18-3bc7-4743-b7ef-2b791fb7d7ad
templateid=3d9b86b4-2dfb-4178-8765-f1099b28747b
zoneid=dba8d8fe-dc8e-4418-a5ea-97407afd95f2 name=testvm
你说的这个错误可以忽略。
只要在web ui上system vm的vm state是running，agent state是up就可以了。
2013/11/25 Nick nick.ch...@kland.com.tw
Hello All
请教一下，management是如何去确认SSVM是否有起来的呢？？
透过SSH吗？？那是透过那一个IP？Public IP or Private IP or Link Local IP
Address.
在WEB UI都己经看到Console Proxy VM Secondary Storage VM already
那么该如何破？除了换系统外
在 2013年11月25日下午4:52，Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com写道：
这个应该就是我说的linux 3.*的udev问题。
在 2013年11月25日上午9:48，Du Jun dj199...@gmail.com写道：
Hi ZHOU,
如果我先stop虚拟机，再挂载volume，然后再启动虚拟机，那么一切都ok的。就是不能在虚拟机运行的时候挂载。或者我虚拟机第一次启动的时候，我挂载上去，那也是ok的，但是我卸载掉volume然后再挂载，那就会报错“Duplicate
ID
Hi all,
I feel confused about /dev/sda , /dev/sdb/ , /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2 , or
/dev/sda5.
I know /dev/sda* is KVM boot partitions.So,how do they work?
Besides,I have a volume whose device_id.to_i=1,so what's the device_name it
equals to? /dev/sda or /dev/sdb? How does cloudstack calculate it?
Hello Richard
如您所说的，在global settings里的management.network.cidr，的确是错误的网段。
那我现在也把他修正为管理网段了，并重启了management server
且管理节点的管理ip和ssvm的管理节点IP，确认是可以ping的通了
但在log里，依旧一直出现No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to
LocalHostEndPoint
不知还有哪儿是要在注意的地方吗？？
Thanks
-Original Message-
From:
哪位兄弟能格式下退订邮件的地址。我这邮件实在是装不下了。
hellozengsong@gmail
Hi all,
I find I am unable to attach volume to VM while VM is running.The error
message is show below:
Failed to attach volume: volume-1 to VM: standard-ubuntu;
org.libvirt.LibvirtException: internal error unable to execute QEMU command
'device_add': Duplicate ID 'virtio-disk1' for device
The VM
Op 25 november 2013 om 8:01 schreef Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com:
Reply inline.
On 24/11/13 6:52 AM, Lennert den Teuling lenn...@pcextreme.nl wrote:
Hi,
I currently got a directory of 1.1TB on my secondary storage called
volumes. I'm
familiar with the template and snapshot
Hi John,
Thank you so much for your valuable suggestions and directions.
I will set up snort/suricata on management station as well as on each guest
VM, where it will monitor the incoming/outgoing network packets for
intrusions.
*Here I am confused about network intrusions vs system
Dear colleagues,
I'm planning to migrate to CS-4.2.0, but I noticed one pitfall.
When I tried to copy one VM to the new environment from CS-2.2.14, the
operating system inside the VM didn't boot properly, because all sda-devices
became vda-devices.
Are there any hacks to prevent it?
Thank you!
Hi all,
I feel confused about /dev/sda , /dev/sdb/ , /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2 , or
/dev/sda5.
I know /dev/sda* is KVM boot partitions.So,how do they work?
Besides,I have a volume whose device_id.to_i=1,so what's the device_name it
equals to? /dev/sda or /dev/sdb? How does cloudstack calculate it?
Hi all,
I feel confused about /dev/sda , /dev/sdb/ , /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2 , or
/dev/sda5.
I know /dev/sda* is KVM boot partitions.So,how do they work?
Besides,I have a volume whose device_id.to_i=1,so what's the device_name it
equals to? /dev/sda or /dev/sdb? How does cloudstack calculate it?
Hey guys. We have CS 4.1.1 running in our environment. I have a basic zone
with the network offering set to only offer DHCP. When Windows instances
are shut down or rebooted, their DNS entries in our Windows DNS servers are
being lost. I have to get onto the instance and do 'ipconfig /registerdns'
I've been experiencing this.
From our experiences we've set the DNS servers on the instance to the IP
addresses of the AD DNS servers.
We also set the DNS search suffix list to include the DNS suffix for the AD
domain.
We haven't had anyone complain recently...
On 25 November 2013 15:17, Kirk
I did that as well, and they still disappear. I was on the router when I
rebooted an instance and the record in the /etc/dhcphosts.txt would delete
as soon I cycled the instance.
Regards,
Kirk Jantzer
http://about.me/kirkjantzer
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Sean Hamilton
That¹s good to know Lennert.
Do file a bug and say that its resolved in 4.2, in case there are others
in the community on 4.1 and looking for similar information.
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 25/11/13 12:34 AM, Lennert den Teuling lenn...@pcextreme.nl wrote:
Op 25 november 2013 om 8:01 schreef Nitin
Op 25 november 2013 om 16:46 schreef Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com:
That¹s good to know Lennert.
Do file a bug and say that its resolved in 4.2, in case there are others
in the community on 4.1 and looking for similar information.
Done! :-)
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 25/11/13 12:34 AM,
Hi Pradeep,
This may help you
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Plug-ins%2C+Modules%2C+and+Extensions
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Extensions
Regards,
Rayees
-Original Message-
From: Pradeep HK [mailto:pradeep...@yahoo.com]
Sent:
Hello everyone
Not sure whats wrong, but everytime I add 1T nfs share to cloudstack 4.2 it
shows as 100G
anyone else having this issue?
Dean
could you tryto mount the NFS share and use the command df -h?
2013/11/25 Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com
Hello everyone
Not sure whats wrong, but everytime I add 1T nfs share to cloudstack 4.2 it
shows as 100G
anyone else having this issue?
Dean
--
Rafael Weingärtner
I just did on another system and df -h shows 1TB in disk space!
any idea on why this is happening??
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Rafael Weingartner
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com wrote:
could you tryto mount the NFS share and use the command df -h?
2013/11/25 Dean Kamali
where did you get this info?
did you go on infrastructure primary storagestorage?
2013/11/25 Dean Kamali dean.kam...@gmail.com
I just did on another system and df -h shows 1TB in disk space!
any idea on why this is happening??
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Rafael Weingartner
Hi All,
I did upgrade from cs 4.0 to 4.1 followed by release notes.
I met issues when I did step 5. The below is from doc:
After upgrading to 4.1, API clients are expected to send plain text passwords for login
and user creation, instead of MD5 hash.
Hi,
I have setup Primary Storage limits (GiB) -1 in cloudstack global
setting and created account. It setup account limit as some -1074678 gb.
This is major bug in resource limit.
Auto snapshot is not fixed yet in cloudstack.
can you provide patch link and bug post link in apache cloudstack
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK
https://reviews.apache.org/groups/cloudstack/
-Original Message-
From: prak...@assistanz.com [mailto:prak...@assistanz.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:16 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Reg: Resource limit bug in
31 matches
Mail list logo
