Is there any way just to upgrade Apache Tomcat version combined with
cloudstack 3.0.3 ,because Tomcat have some security issue ?
How to remove cloudstack 3.0.2 secondary storage ,Since we have delete all
template and iso file ,but when we try to remove secondary from UI , System
always report "Can not delete this secondary storage due to there are still
private template on it"
On May 2, 2014 6:38 PM, "Amogh Vasekar" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 5/2/14 4:23 PM, "David Bierce" wrote:
>
> >In the database you need to increment because things are stored with an
ID
> >column as the table key, but since cloudmonkey uses the API ID specifies
> >the certificate type, not a unique id
Hi,
On 5/2/14 4:23 PM, "David Bierce" wrote:
>In the database you need to increment because things are stored with an ID
>column as the table key, but since cloudmonkey uses the API ID specifies
>the certificate type, not a unique id for the certificate. id=1 for root,
>id=2 for intermediate, i
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Amogh Vasekar wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 5/2/14 2:41 PM, "David Bierce" wrote:
>
> >upload customcertificate id=2 certificate=URLENCODEDCERTIFICATE
> >domainsuffix=YOUR.DOMAIN name=intermediate_ca_1
> >upload customcertificate id=2 certificate=URLENCODEDCERTIFICATE
>
Hi,
On 5/2/14 2:41 PM, "David Bierce" wrote:
>upload customcertificate id=2 certificate=URLENCODEDCERTIFICATE
>domainsuffix=YOUR.DOMAIN name=intermediate_ca_1
>upload customcertificate id=2 certificate=URLENCODEDCERTIFICATE
>domainsuffix=YOUR.DOMAIN name=intermediate_ca_2
>upload customcerti
I tried adding the certificates using cloudmonkey by doing single/double quotes
around the certificate as well as manually replacing line breaks with \n and
quoting but none of those methods inserted into the database correctly.
With one of our installs, the wildcard cert was issued by Comodo wh
Look at network offerings and see what you service you could replace the
Default VR with. For example, you can see the drop downs on firewall,
loadbalancer, ...
Create an offering with your JunOS device
Amin
From: Fred Newtz
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Hello,
I recently purchased a JuniperOS device and want to implement it into my
current setup. Does anyone have any advice on making this change? I have
been looking for information about the process and come up empty handed.
Any links or information will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Fred
The only issues I've run into are that you can only have one vCenter
Datacenter per zone, and that if you're separating the guest and public
traffic on different NICs that you take care to ensure the respective
vSphere and KVM network labels are correct. If you need this last part and
don't do it,
It’s not an issue. You need to bring them in as different clusters. Any
templates will need to be create for each hypervisor type, but other than that,
it will work well.
Willard Rathjen
Cloud Systems Engineer
Office +1.800.735.7104 | Direct +1.515.612.7813
willard.rath...@appcore.com | www.app
I was thinking of giving Cloudstack a try; I wanted to know if you could use
ESXi and KVM host in the same CloudStack zone, and what that looks like.
if your hosts is acting as a router, the answer is yes. Otherwise, just set
your network's gateway as you would do in a computer that you are adding to
the network..
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Ana Paula de Sousa wrote:
> The hypervisor.
> Em 02/05/2014 09:34, "Rafael Weingartner"
> escreve
anyone ? :)
On 1 May 2014 16:19, Andrija Panic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting errors when trying to attach new DATA disk to a running VM...
> :
>
> I had to replace CentOS 6.5 libvirt 0.10.2 with manually compiled libvirt
> 1.2.3 in order to support RBD as storage... this is CS 4.2.1 on CentOS 6
On 01.05.2014 18:10, sandeep khandekar wrote:
Thanks Nux My template download started. I just added one of the DNS
server
IP in my ssvm and it started
cat >>/etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 103.XX.XX.XX
Health check I run it successfully without any errors.
Thankyou very much!!!
If the SSVM did
Could it be possible the Global setting: host is set to localhost or the
hostname here would resolve as 127.0.0.1 from the /etc/hosts file?
Pierre-Luc Dion
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
855-OK-CLOUD (855-652-5683) x1101
- - -
*CloudOps*420 rue Guy
Montréal QC H3J 1S6
The hypervisor.
Em 02/05/2014 09:34, "Rafael Weingartner"
escreveu:
> Which host are you talking about?
>
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Ana Paula de Sousa >wrote:
>
> > Oh, I see. Knowing that, can use my host to carry the traffic, in other
> > words, can it fill the role of gateway?
> > E
Which host are you talking about?
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Ana Paula de Sousa wrote:
> Oh, I see. Knowing that, can use my host to carry the traffic, in other
> words, can it fill the role of gateway?
> Em 24/04/2014 15:59, "Chiradeep Vittal"
> escreveu:
>
> > The gateway is a router man
Oh, I see. Knowing that, can use my host to carry the traffic, in other
words, can it fill the role of gateway?
Em 24/04/2014 15:59, "Chiradeep Vittal"
escreveu:
> The gateway is a router managed by you, not by CloudStack. Think of each
> POD as a rack of servers for example. The IP addresses for
On Apr 30, 2014, at 4:14 PM, Evan McGee wrote:
> +1 on this — it’s a bit surprising that such a major regression made it into
> 4.3 final, as it appears any installation with traffic labeling will be
> affected.
>
> Should this conversation be moved to d...@cloudstack.apache.org?
Yes please
20 matches
Mail list logo
