We are running vSphere 5.5 with ACS 4.3.0, i'd suggest building from
source against 4.3 branch that contain latest bugfixes.
I can rebuild it on my test box and post latest unofficial build 4.3.0.1
on my site
Regards
ilya
On 6/26/14, 6:08 PM, Xerex Bueno wrote:
All,
Does anyone know if 5.5
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Instal
lation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html
Section 4.5.7 has instructions on adding additional MS.
-abhi
On 26/06/14 10:55 pm, "Tejas Gadaria" wrote:
>I want to setup HA of MS with HAproxy OR Keepalived.
>
>I hav
Hi,
Also on clodstack side in Globle configuration do I need to replace host ip
with virtual ip ?
Regards,
Tejas
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:29 AM, DATACOM - Marcelo.Veriato <
marcelo.veri...@datacom.ind.br> wrote:
> My HA environment (active-standby) to MS is ok with keepalived. Just need
> a f
Hi, as far as I know, 5.5 is supported, and there is no need to modify any
code, because vSphere 5.5 Management API is perfectly compatible with 5.1.
We've been using it in our test environment.
--
hubo
2014-06-27
-
All,
Does anyone know if 5.5 is supported, and what files I need to include to
satisfy the dependencies when building from source?
This document is PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL and may not be duplicated,
redistributed, or displayed to any other party without
Thanks ilya, I already installed CS 4.2, so I can't add secondary
storage by VMFS in this version?
So, do you mean in 4.3 this feature is available?
*
José
*
El 26/06/2014 16:54, ilya musayev escribió:
I'm using NFS and VMFS (can be SAN or Local).
I'd suggest an update to 4.3 - when 4.3.0.1
Secondary storage at this point in time must reside on NFS. If its POC
setup, you can run NFS on the same server as your CloudStack Management
Server.
On 6/26/14, 10:08 AM, José Egas López wrote:
Hi, I have one question, I'm trying to implement CS 4.2 with vSphere
5.1, which way can I use to
I'm using NFS and VMFS (can be SAN or Local).
I'd suggest an update to 4.3 - when 4.3.0.1 comes out.
If you can build from source, i'd recommend doing it against 4.3 branch
- this way you dont have to wait for 4.3.0.1 release.
With newer release there are many more features and bug fixes when
I believe you can use Vmfs as well.
Erik
26. juni 2014 19:12 skrev "José Egas López"
følgende:
> Hi, I have one question, I'm trying to implement CS 4.2 with vSphere 5.1,
> which way can I use to configure Primary and Secondary Storages without
> using NFS?
> Thanks to all for the help!
>
> *
>
I believe I have answered my own question. I remove the appropriate lines from
the pom.xml file under the plugin directory in case anyone else wants to know.
-Original Message-
From: Xerex Bueno
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 1:41 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: non-OSS
My HA environment (active-standby) to MS is ok with keepalived. Just
need a floating IP address. My structure is two servers for MS and two
for DB, with acs 4.2 I use keepalived for database servers too, with 4.3
I use native database HA ...
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.ac
When I am building from source, how can I tell it to ignore plugins such as F5,
and Netapp for example so the build completes without errors?
-Original Message-
From: ilya musayev [mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:29 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
I want to setup HA of MS with HAproxy OR Keepalived.
I have MS1 & DB1 installed on 10.1.1.2 &
MS2 & DB2 installed on 10.1.1.3
also DB has master - master replication setup.
Need help on this how can i setup failover for MS.
Regards,
Tejas
Hi, I have one question, I'm trying to implement CS 4.2 with vSphere
5.1, which way can I use to configure Primary and Secondary Storages
without using NFS?
Thanks to all for the help!
*
José
*
FARMAENLACE ha procesado su mensaje y esta l
Chris - Please use the wiki [1] in case you see any issues registering
your template. That¹s the one you should use here.
[1] -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Sec
ondary+storage+troubleshooting
On 25/06/14 5:16 AM, "chris" wrote:
>Thanks.
>
>My attempt
if you want to run multiple CloudStack env using same networks but
different databases and different version of CloudStack you have to use
seperate secondary storage, at least it have to have a different mountpoint
if they use the same nfs server , ex: /export/env1, /export/env2
Also two seperate
Hello,
I have setup two CS env but both are using same infrastructure
.Now i am getting a lot of conflict problem due to separate db
Env1-CS1 --> DB1
Env2- CS2 --> DB2
*Conflict scenario :*
1) during vm creation it was found that vm-id had been conflicted in xen
host
2) duri
If that is the case please file a bug and (importantly) include the
supporting documentation, unless you can find an existing bug for this.
As mentioned earlier the distinction between allowed and supported is
important. With old XenServer versions, for example, you can add more
disks than what i
Hi Kirk,
For KVM, 20 data block devices is supported if using virtio paravirtualization
drivers but CloudStack is set to allow only 10.
Regards
Antonio
On 06/26/2014 11:43 AM, Kirk Kosinski wrote:
Hi, the limit is supposed to be based on what the hypervisor supports.
CloudStack cannot support
Hi, the limit is supposed to be based on what the hypervisor supports.
CloudStack cannot support more disks than what the hypervisor supports.
In some cases the hypervisor might allow adding more disks than the
officially supported number, but this is not a good idea so by default
CloudStack follo
Please help with the mysql commands to change this setting.
On 06/26/2014 07:08 AM, Antonio Packery wrote:
Thanks Koushik, I was just wondering if there was a technology reason for this
limit?
Original Message
From: Koushik Das
Sent: Thursday 26 June 2014 06:20
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Daan,
Yup, a link will do just fine for now.
In addition to that I'll require also the kickstart file used to build it. The
images will have to be rebuilt regularly so we don't ship vulnerable/obsolete
stuff.
I'll have to write some sort of FAQ on this.
Lucian
- Original Message -
>
love it Lucian, How will the procedure for submissions look? (I'm
thinking a mail to you with a download link)
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:18 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> This is awesome on Nux's part. I am thrilled to see this come to fruition.
>
> This is not an official CloudStack deployment. There
23 matches
Mail list logo
