http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Admin_Guide/pvlan.html
可参考这个资料
H3C 关于pvlan的支持
http://book.51cto.com/art/201201/311440.htm
在 2014年10月29日 下午7:23，aix.niuy aix.n...@gmail.com 写道：
http://network.51cto.com/art/200509/3644.htm
I have tried to do upgrade 2nd time and failed again. The sequence of actions
is described here:
http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgrade-4.4.html
Followed instructions until the end. VM upgrade has taken more than 5 hrs. The
result of update is:
Hi!
after reading the 4.4.0 - 4.4.1-thread on the list, I think I'm
prepared for an Update.
Running the management-node on Ubuntu 14.04 and following the documented
update procedure (which leads to something easy as apt-get upgrade),
I've noticed that there are no packages for 4.4.1 available at
Hi,
I'm setting up an advanced zone on ACS 4.3 but have hit a block with the
public network. Our setup is as follows:
Internet -- FW-L2/L3 switch---ACS management
XS62 hosts (192.168.44.x)
196.5.20.x/24|-Public
Hi Osay,
Your Public Traffic needs to be exactly that, 'Public' - It is supposed to be
Public IPs directly connected to the Internet without any Firewalls in the way.
The Virtual Router is the Firewall for each Isolated Guest Network.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44
Thanks Geoff. I thought so myself. I need to speak to the security chaps
to prepare a VLAN that isn't controlled by our edge FW.
Regards,
Osay
On 30 October 2014 11:00, Geoff Higginbottom
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi Osay,
Your Public Traffic needs to be exactly that,
Hello Rohit,
So when doing a cloudstack-setup-databases with -i 192.168.0.100 i have
to specify the vip of the netscaler ? As well i am on the first node or on
the second node or N node ?
Yes the management server was crashed, for the moment i don't have the
access to this management server
Hi,
On 30-Oct-2014, at 2:52 pm, benoit lair kurushi4...@gmail.com wrote:
So when doing a cloudstack-setup-databases with -i 192.168.0.100 i have
to specify the vip of the netscaler ? As well i am on the first node or on
the second node or N node ?
The -i ip is used as the host IP by
I think we mist that, Stephan. Sorry about that.
Wido, can you create them?
thanks,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Stephan Seitz
s.se...@secretresearchfacility.com wrote:
Hi!
after reading the 4.4.0 - 4.4.1-thread on the list, I think I'm
prepared for an Update.
Running the
Hi guys,
snapshoting is broken on CentOS 6.5 - because RedHat removed the -s flag
within qemu-img tool in the 6.5 binaries - and this -s flag is still
being used in latest ACS 4.4.1.
Is this going to be fixed any time soon, or what are the plan's for this ?
--
Andrija Panić
Hi,
I would also like to hear more about best practices for network
architecture, but so far have found only VLAN isolation described more or less
thoroughly.
1. We have recently set up VLANs and didn't fill the limit yet. :) GRE
is one of the options, but can't say how it
No, we use only software VR. Client reserves IP from the pool and assigns to
VM it wants. Cloudstack manages it well. I guess you may partition the public
IP range for every client separately, but haven't tried to do it.
Vadim.
-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic
Thanks Nux.
On 30 October 2014 12:21, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hi,
I haven't heard anything about any fixes, but I don't think it's worth
spending too much time over it, there is a simple workaround.
Hi,
Performance between xs and kvm is similar, imho it should not be a reason to
change, this goes for most other hypervisors. You will just make your setup
even more complex and harder to maintain and troubleshoot.
Don't do it.
Just make sure in all cases you use paravirtual drivers in your
I would also add a point about networking - hypervisors use different approach
for traffic labelling. We tried to combine Xen and KVM within one zone of
advanced networking and failed. KVM has to have different bridges for
public/private networking while Xen uses one bridge per-physical NIC.
If you don't wish to wait you may use the ones generated by shapeblue.
http://shapeblue.com/packages/
http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/debian/4.4/
On 30 October 2014 10:04, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we mist that, Stephan. Sorry about that.
Wido,
Ian,
thanks for your suggestion. I was not aware of shapeblue's repo.
Since I'm a little short on spare-systems for testing and do not know
how well these repos mix, I think I'll wait for Wido's packages.
If I'm getting impatient, I'll start an off-site side-project with
shapeblue's packages
Hi Stephan,
We recently made our CloudStack packages repositories. We use the default
process to build deb/rpms but we don’t build debs/rpms for specific
distro/release but as general APT/YUM repository. It’s recommended to test run
upgrades on a test setup using the new repository. You may
On 10/30/2014 11:04 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
I think we mist that, Stephan. Sorry about that.
Wido, can you create them?
Yes. But currently my internet connection isn't the best where I am, so
it will take some time.
Wido
thanks,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Stephan Seitz
Hi Rohit,
I currently did some preflight checks, and noticed distro/release
incompatibilities against Wido's specific packages. (Something you
already mentioned in your mail)
At least package dependencies are problematic (e.g. mysql-client vs.
mysql-client-5.5 vs mariadb-client).
Anyway,
Hi!
Hi!
I'm having more strange issues with my GRE-based isolated networks:
While investigating my other issues, I noticed this output from ovs-vsctl
show on the xenservers:
Bridge xapi29
fail_mode: standalone
Port t1546-4-3
Interface t1546-4-3
Hi Vadim,
I finally was able to upgrade successfully Cloudstack 4.4.0 to Cloudstack
4.4.1. I used this guider:
http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgrade-4.4.html
Download System VMs from here: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/
I specifically used this:
upgrading from 4.4.0 really required this manual db patch:
ALTER TABLE `snapshot_policy` ADD `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT NULL
DEFAULT '1'
?
If so we will update the RN..
PL
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:29 PM, motty cruz motty.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Vadim,
I finally was able to upgrade
HI PL,
I upgrade my testing cluster for 3 times with bad results, until I manually
updated the DB as Andrija suggested in this email.
Thanks,
Celso
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org
wrote:
upgrading from 4.4.0 really required this manual db patch:
ALTER
I envision to run these pre/post scripts on CS management server. These
scripts can be in any of languages such as shell/ruby/python/java.
Here is our use case:
We¹d like to automatically register new instances in RedHat IPA server
(something like windows nodes auto joining an AD domain when it
Do you have ssh keys or any other means to access the servers automatically?
What I'm thinking is that you could deploy the rabbitmq event notification
message queue, and listen for create/destroy calls.
I don't think you would be able to intercept the create call and alter it's
runtime, but you
Oh, thank you so much, folks, for your replies on this topic! Now I understand
that I shouldn't migrate to XenServer, as I already have a bunch of hosts
running KVM and it really won't be a good idea to bread such a zoo.
The only thing that makes me feel envy is an ability to change
I wold love to see the ability to do proper snapshotting on KVM. XenServer does
it so much better!
- Original Message -
From: Vladimir Melnik v.mel...@uplink.ua
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 30 October, 2014 8:09:17 PM
Subject: RE: XenServer
Oh, thank you so
I am no expert by any means but my personal opinion, I really like
XenServer a lot better. I have a cluster of about 5 machines running KVM,
ACS 4.3. I unable to do snapshot, migrating VMs from one host to another
takes a long time. I had a very bad experience with Balloon driver, I am
traumatize
I would happily switch to XenServer once they will have ceph support. I do
prefer XenServer and the feature list of ACS + XenServer is a bit better.
It sucks not having proper snapshotting in KVM where one can create the whole
vm snapshot (volumes + memory) very quickly without the need to
Hello all, i'm trying to change the default system offering for software
routers with more ram and some tags for the storage. i create a new system
service offering for software router; Now i wanna set as default, how can i
do that ?
I tried to delete the delete the System Offering For Software
+1 for that - KVM being nice and all that - but still missing complete
snapshoot capability - driving me nuts...
On 30 October 2014 22:24, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:
I would happily switch to XenServer once they will have ceph support. I do
prefer XenServer and the feature
Andrei, I am hopeful the next incarnation of XenServer will be much
better/modern, with support for CEPH, GlusterFS etc.
Re KVM snapshotting, KVM can do live snapshots of the volumes+memory (you can
do it with virsh), but ACS doesn't support it; forgot why.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta
Hi Martin,
Are you trying to configure PF on SourceNAT IP address? If yes can you check
whether the conserver mode is set to Yes in your network offering?
-Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 6:26 PM
To:
34 matches
Mail list logo
