Hello Andrija,
as far as I can tell, KVM module is loaded and KVM is installed:
[root@host05 ~]# lsmod | grep kvm
kvm 337772 0
[root@host05 ~]# service libvirtd status
libvirtd (pid 5170) is running...
Thanks,
Michal
On 11/12/2014 08:43 AM, Andrija Panic wrote:
> Hi Mic
Hello Erik,
kvm module is loaded:
[root@host05 ~]# lsmod | grep kvm
kvm 337772 0
Thanks,
Michal
On 11/12/2014 08:42 AM, Erik Weber wrote:
> Do an: lsmod | grep kvm
> on the hypervisor, according to the log the agent doesn't think the host is
> capable of running kvm
>
Hello,
It might happen if you have basic zone setup. We have implemented such
configuration with XenServer, but it is confusable indeed. It is better to have
differen LAN-s (VLANs) and partition the network properly. External L2/L3
switch is also a requirement.
Vadim.
-Origina
Hi Michal,
please check if the kvm is installed and if kernel module is actually
loaded...?
On 12 November 2014 08:34, Michal Loncek wrote:
> Hello Gopalakrishnan,
>
> here is the output of the log:
> --
> 2014-11-12 02:27:59,953 INFO [c.c.r.ResourceMana
Do an: lsmod | grep kvm
on the hypervisor, according to the log the agent doesn't think the host is
capable of running kvm
--
Erik
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Michal Loncek wrote:
> Hello Gopalakrishnan,
>
> here is the output of the log:
> --
> 201
Hi team,
is anybody of you aware of the GUI issues when connected to some i.e.
wireless with somewhat big latencies or it sometimes happen even on more
than good internet connection:
i.e:
1)
(A serious one, that we encounter pretty often):
Issue: I start new VM deloyment wizard, choose template
Hello Gopalakrishnan,
here is the output of the log:
--
2014-11-12 02:27:59,953 INFO [c.c.r.ResourceManagerImpl]
(catalina-exec-19:ctx-2667c76b
ctx-0e8268fd) Trying to add a new host at http://87.244.198.134 in data center 1
2014-11-12 02:28:00,121 DEBUG [
Hi Dan,
It may caused your KVM host bridge settings. Please make sure its working
fine using this command.
[root@kvm ~]# brctl show
Also check the KVM host /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties file network
segregation settings.
guest.network.device=cloudbr0
private.network.device=cloudb
Hi Clark,
You cannot remove host while running VMs on your cloudstack. I am not sure
what you had done to reinstall cloudstack-agent and cloudstack database. If
you had local storage disk corruption then it will affect all your running
VMs ROOT disks and DATA disks.
If you will re add the ho
Templates are failing to deploy, Also the default template is failing and it
used to work. The only thing that has change as I tried to update to 4.4.1
and it failed and I had to roll back the db and the management servers. I
can deploy new VM's just fine so it has something to do with the template
Hi there!
I want to expand one of my LV-s to 22TB. I know about Xenserver limit,
and it's does not work now but I had already succesfully expand LV-s
over 10TB on native Xenserver 6.2 in command line, and it's works fine
over a year.
Actually I want to know, what will be happen, if I do it und
Hi, All,
Can experts examine the settings above if they are problematic? Could
Management Server, KVM host and VMs all sit in the same 192.168.0.0/24
network? I checked a lot but have no idea, all firewalls have been turned
off but still the SSVM could not contact Management server and the outsid
I'm trying to find out if a bug we experience is known and fixed in a later
version or not.
We're running ACS/CCP 4.3.0 on XenServer 6.2, with advanced networking
(VLAN isolated).
The problem is that whenever a network is created or restarted it won't
allow external access before an egress rule h
Howdy everyone,
Story:
Host with all its VMs on local storage had its OS mirrored disk die and
cause some problems with the running cloudstack-agent and corruption. I
uninstalled/reinstalled the agent and that caused the cloudstack-manger to
freak out and be in a state that I couldn't disconnect i
Hi, All,
When debugging why my SSVM could not access outside, I see the following
route table on SSVM:
root@s-1-VM:~# ip route show
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.1.47
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.22
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth2 pr
Thanks Rajani, I checked that the agent is running on SSVM:
root@s-1-VM:~# service cloud status
CloudStack cloud service (type=secstorage) is running: process id: 3887
When I run
*SSVM health check, it outputs:First DNS server is 192.168.0.100PING
192.168.0.100 (192.168.0.100)
One week left before CloudStack conference, come join the fun.
See you all in Budapest for a packed and exciting schedule.
http://cloudstackcollab.org
Can you provide more logs , was Copycmd successful ?
-Original Message-
From: Garith Dugmore [mailto:gar...@saao.ac.za]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 3:10 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Secondary storage problem
Hi,
Could it be "secstorage.allowed.internal.sites"
11 November 2014 —Apache CloudStack, the mature, turnkey Open Source cloud
computing software platform used for creating private, public, and hybrid cloud
environments, today announced Apache CloudMonkey v5.3.0, the latest feature
release of its command line interface tool.
CloudMonkey is writt
Hi,
Could it be "secstorage.allowed.internal.sites" in Global Settings? I ran into
this a while back.
Cheers,
- Original Message -
> From: "MOULOUD BOUKROUT"
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 8:50:10 AM
> Subject: Secondary storage problem
> Hi U
Exactly - and just for reference - overprovisioning does not wotk with
LOCAL storage - only with shared storage...
So give us the du -hs /home/*output as I asked, and same command for
any subfolder inside /home/
On 11 November 2014 09:44, Erik Weber wrote:
> If you're using thin provisionin
If you're using thin provisioning or overprovisioning you may very well
allocate more than you're physically able to fit.
What your VM sees is based on the virtual disk image size and does not
refer to any underlying infrastructure.
Your problem is that the underlying storage is full, so when you
My friend, your space on the physical host is used 100%. It might be
because of some other data inside /home.
do du -hs /home/*and same comand for any subfolder inside
Home. To me, it seems that you VM's volume of 1TB which is still only 759GB
on the disk, can not expand any more on ph
23 matches
Mail list logo
