Re: building CS with vmware generates errors

I found the solution!I use vim25.jar file that exist in "https://my.vmware.com/group/vmware/get-download?downloadGroup=VSP510-WEBSDK-510"Using "http://zooi.widodh.nl/cloudstack/build-dep/vmware-vim25.jar"; makes errors.  

RE: To let SSVM reach outside network.

Dan, I would suggest you to use external proxy/GW to hide you network. Not the same host that contains management server. Because if you would like to scale it up - how do you do it?? Management server should be rather simple component of infrastructure and to put more functions on it is a bad

Re: request timed out on hitting console button

Hi Amogh, Thanks for the headsup...As told by you I tried ping from external network and found that i cudnt...I checked on the net and found that by default egress is allowed but ingress is blocked on virtual machine security groups...So I proceeded to add the following rules in ingress TCP star

Re: How to set the size of primary storage

Hi Yan, How many drives in your NFS server? One drive with 1TB disk and create NFS share folder on that drive? You may be created NFS folder on /root partition which may contain 100G disk. Please make sure your NFS folder drive size. Thank You. Gopalakrishann.S Cloud Consultant - Fogpanel

How to set the size of primary storage

Hi Everybody, I have a NFS server which act as primary storage server. The hard disk of this server is a 1TB disk. However, after I setup CloudStack platform, through the console I saw that primary storage is just 98.43G. So my question is how to set the size of primary storage. I expect it is at

Re: request timed out on hitting console button

By default console proxy will run in HTTP mode and listen on port 80. If you wish to run on HTTPS, you will need to set up your own DNS and SSL certificate. The wiki you mentioned needs to be updated with current info :-) For the second part of not being able to reach the web service - I'd start b

building CS with vmware generates errors

I want to build CS 4.3.1 with "noredist". For first time I use vSphere 5.1 SDK but I got some errors about missing classes so I download and extract vSphere 5.5 SDK and resolve that errors. But I face with this error when I try to compile the code: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.

Error in the upgrade docs 4.4.0 to 4.4.1

I think there is an error in the upgrade documents and below I have tried to explain what is wrong. By following the upgrade doc's http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgrade-4. 4.html You are not installing the correct system VM Template. On a fresh install http

deb packages status

Hi All, Last time I tried to install the 4.4.0 deb packages I found that it still had tomcat6 as a dependency and links to it sprinkled throughout the configuration files (CLOUDSTACK-7636 ). I never saw any 4.4.1 build on the repos and it seem

Re: The Simplest way to Run CloudStack on VirtualBox

Hi Imesh, For ssh key pairs follow this[1]. [1]. https://portal.redbridge.se/faq/instances/how-do-i-create-an-instance-with-public-key-based-authentication-enabled/ On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Asanka sanjaya Herath wrote: > ​Hi imesh, > > Did you configure Egress, Ingress rules for the

Re: The Simplest way to Run CloudStack on VirtualBox

​Hi imesh, Did you configure Egress, Ingress rules for the network?​ On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Geoff Higginbottom < geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > An alternative to using DevCloud is to follow this article and deploy > CloudStack on VirtualBox using a XenServer Hypervisor >

Catalina Was unable to find lock for the key vm_instance21 and thread id 1028777108

ACS4.4.0 and Xenserver 6.2 all patched. Here is the error message for a failing snapshot 2014-11-18 10:41:53,705 INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor] (API-Job-Executor-1:ctx-2149b75d job-1186) Add job-1186 into job monitoring 2014-11-18 10:41:53,707 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl] (

Re: To let SSVM reach outside network.

Hi, Vadim, We have to use 2 NICs on the management server as we want to hide the cloudstack cluster behind the 10.* network, so all KVM hosts and guest VMs are in the 192.168.0.* subnet, and they connect to the management server's internal NIC(192.168.0.100). Is it a rule that the management serv

Re: Cloudstack Deploy DB fails on 4.3 branch !

Hi Sebastien, I will do it as soon as I get time during ApacheCon/CCCEU14. For now I just reverted this patch which would allow people to build 4.3 branch. Hope to see you around soon. > On 18-Nov-2014, at 6:43 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > > On Nov 18, 2014, at 5:35 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote

RE: The Simplest way to Run CloudStack on VirtualBox

An alternative to using DevCloud is to follow this article and deploy CloudStack on VirtualBox using a XenServer Hypervisor http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack/virtualbox-test-env/ It’s a configuration which is very close to a Production setup so perfect for test and demo etc Regards Geoff Higgin

Re: Cloudstack Deploy DB fails on 4.3 branch !

On Nov 18, 2014, at 5:35 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Deepal, > > We currently lack an upgrade path from 4.3.1 to 4.3.2. Also because we’re not > sure if we want to do a 4.3.2 release. I’ll temporarily revert a patch that > changes the version to 4.3.2-SNAPSHOT on 4.3 branch so you can compile

Re: Cloudstack Deploy DB fails on 4.3 branch !

Hi Deepal, We currently lack an upgrade path from 4.3.1 to 4.3.2. Also because we’re not sure if we want to do a 4.3.2 release. I’ll temporarily revert a patch that changes the version to 4.3.2-SNAPSHOT on 4.3 branch so you can compile and deploydb, after we have an upgrade path we can add it b

RE: Assign multiple users to a single virtual machine

Tilak, The console proxy feature connects you to the local console session of the VM via the Hypervisor, hence only one connection is allowed. For more than one use to connect to and manage a VM simply use SSH to connect to the VM etc Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 2

Re: Assign multiple users to a single virtual machine

I just tried this project feature of cloudstackbut I am facing issues...thing is I want both the user to share instances of the virtual machine..Here what is currently implemented both users cannot access the machine simultaneously..If one user clicks the console button there is Access denied o

Re: To let SSVM reach outside network.

if you are behind a authenticated proxy or cannot access the outside network a little trick that worked for me was downloading the iso on the management server. Then running *python -m SimpleHTTPServer * in the download directory to turn it into a sort of mirror and then using that to upload the is

Cloudstack Deploy DB fails on 4.3 branch !

In my cloudstack installation, database deployment fails and gives following error: An exception occured while executing the Java class. null: InvocationTargetException: The end upgrade version is actually at 4.3.1 but our management server code version is at 4.3.2-SNAPSHOT -> [Help 1] I am curre

RE: To let SSVM reach outside network.

Will fix my last point - KVM should have at least 2 bridges, not necessarily interfaces - public/private. Vadim -Original Message- From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 11:21 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: To let SSV

RE: To let SSVM reach outside network.

Hello Dan, It seems there is something wrong with your network setup and here are some places to search: 1. Why your management server has 2 NICs? It should not work as NAT, proxy or any kind of switch - keep this in mind. 2. SSVM normally has to have 3 interfaces (at least). One -- wi

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.3 branch backporting bugfixes

Two points of concern, Rohit; 1. Doing this is making a promise for the future. Can and will we keep this? 2. don't port anything to 4.3.2 that you don't apply to the 4.4 branch as well. otherwise I'm all for it.

[DISCUSS] 4.3 branch backporting bugfixes

Hi, ACS 4.3 branch and both 4.3.0 and 4.3.1 were rock solid releases. Before 4.5.0 is out or a stable and well-tested 4.4.x release, should we go through issues reported for affects version 4.3.0/4.3.1 but a fix version that is 4.4.x/4.5.x/4.6.x [1] and backport on 4.3 branch. Should we do a 4

Re: Assign multiple users to a single virtual machine

Hi, projects are the likely solution, but keep in mind that VMs are owned by accounts and not users, and that you can create multiple users in one account. Any user in an account can therefore access the VMs created by any other user in the account. Best regards, Kirk On 11/17/2014 11:38 PM, Til