Hi.
wondering if it is possible to set overprovisioning factor to less than 1 ?
I have 1 NFS box, 2 x 10GB cards inside, don't want to do bonding, but
efectively present this single box as 2 boxes via 2 IP adresses - so in
this scenario I need to set overprovisioning factor to less than 1, to i.e
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Satya Narayana wrote:
> Hi Jaypal,
>
> I configure dns server in my system vm node and updated routing table to
> point to another node as gateway. The other node is having access to
> internet and is also acting as software router.
>
> However, when i executed ssv
Hi guys,
sorry for spaming, guess not really apropriate place for this, but...:
If anybody from Serbia/Belgrade - please consider joining
https://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=8208104
I would like to start meetings in Belgrade etc.
--
Andrija Panić
Hi Dan, could you please try to create VMs without using afinity groups,
and provide MS log output...
On 2 December 2014 at 00:45, Dan Dong wrote:
> Hi, All,
> When I tried to create more than 2 VMs on my 2 KVM hosts, it failed
> by "Unable
> to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-17-VM], Plea
Hi Satya,
your routing table seems funny to me personaly:
192.168.1.00.0.0.0
255.255.255.0 eth1
192.168.1.00.0.0.0
255.255.255.0 eth2
192.168.1.00.0.0.0
255.255.255.0
Hi Jaypal,
I configure dns server in my system vm node and updated routing table to
point to another node as gateway. The other node is having access to
internet and is also acting as software router.
However, when i executed ssvm-check.sh from systemvm console I got below
error.
root@s-3-VM:~#
Hi,
Following is the snapshot on my Systemvm console.
root@s-3-VM:~# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
DestinationGateway
GenmaskIface
0.0.0.0 192.168.1.27
0.0.0.0eth2
169.254.0.0.
Hi,
Please check the routing table on the SSVM.
Check the reachability of the storage network from the SSVM.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 02-Dec-2014, at 10:55 AM, Satya Narayana
wrote:
> I am not getting Download Complete status after clicking on CentOS5.5(64
> bit) no GUI (KVM) link in Templates page
I am not getting Download Complete status after clicking on CentOS5.5(64
bit) no GUI (KVM) link in Templates page.
My routing table on Management Server node is as follows.
Destination Gateway GenmaskIface
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.2
Since its "shared", it is assumed you will be handling this portion on
your own.
On 11/24/14, 12:05 AM, Alireza Eskandari wrote:
Hi friends,Is there any solution to provide firewall (or something like security
groups)for VMs on vmware in a "guest shared network"?Thanks
Hi, All,
When I tried to create more than 2 VMs on my 2 KVM hosts, it failed
by "Unable
to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-17-VM], Please check the affinity
groups provided, there may not be sufficient capacity to follow them". But
each KVM host has 24 cores, 48GB RAM and 8TB of disk, the ins
Thanks Pierre-Luc,
I would like to max network throughput as possible?
Thanks,
Motty
On 12/01/2014 01:35 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
Motty,
do you want to keep the network throttling but add more throughput or want
to disable to have max network throughput as possible?
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Archi
Motty,
do you want to keep the network throttling but add more throughput or want
to disable to have max network throughput as possible?
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
Thanks Pierre-Luc, Geoff,
both vm.network.throttling.rate and network.throttling.rate are set to
1024, also, Systems Compute for the router has Network rate set to 1024.
after all setting were change restart VR, I even restarted network,
cloudstack-management and even the two VMs i'm testing
As Geoff is saying and you also need to restart VRs. and Instance if
vm.network.throttling.rate
was changed
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|*
Motty,
It’s the vm.network.throttling.rate you need to change OR the Network Rate on
the Compute offering your VMs are using.
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Motty Cruz [
Hi all, I notice transfer rate between VMs in same network is about
20MB. In Globol settings I set
network.throttling.rate= 1024
did a transfer test, rate still the same, any ideas? suggestions?
Thanks,
Motty
I am sorry, in my previous post, i mistakenly mentioned 192.168.1.5 for
Management server and 192.168.1.2 for Cloudstack-agent node in the
begining. It is 192.168.1.2 for management server node and 192.168.1.5 for
cloudstack-agent node. The rest of the content is same.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:23
Hi,
In my organization we use dhcp and connect to internet through the proxy
server. Since it is advised not to use dhcp during cloud installation
process i followed below approach.
I connected two laptops using crossover cable and given IP addresses as
192.168.1.5 for Management Server node and
Hi Andrei,
Thanks for bringing this to our notice. With Ubuntu 14.04/14.10, the
default pip has some issues. To install CloudMonkey or any package
dependent on "requests" users simply need to upgrade pip to make it work:
1. Uninstall the default pip:
sudo apt-get remove --purge python-pip
2.
Here is the managemnt logs:
2014-12-01 11:06:03,560 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache]
(DirectAgent-1:ctx-2f06bbbe) Seq 1-4157385406016389183: Response Received:
2014-12-01 11:06:03,560 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (DirectAgent-1:ctx-2f06bbbe)
Seq 1-4157385406016389183: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtI
Hi, CloudStack uses the network labels to determine VM network
configuration, so if you change the name of network labels in XenServer
you need to update the labels in CloudStack. Luckily this can be
accomplished easily in the UI. See the documentation for details. You
may want to try it a test
Here is the managemnt logs:
2014-12-01 11:06:03,560 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache]
(DirectAgent-1:ctx-2f06bbbe) Seq 1-4157385406016389183: Response Received:
2014-12-01 11:06:03,560 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (DirectAgent-1:ctx-2f06bbbe)
Seq 1-4157385406016389183: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtI
Hi everyone,
Thanks for a great discussion.
I understand it may be difficult to support releases for several years with
CloudStack’s fast paced development, and the statistics Leo shared are
certainly not what I was aiming for.
I think it will be difficult to gather agreement in this stage and
24 matches
Mail list logo
