Hi Daniel,
I'm not exactly sure what's happening. The general issues around this
are incorrectly configured primary/secondary storage, systemvm templates
not seeded or chmod issues.
If you're trying with KVM, you may read this:
http://bhaisaab.org/logs/cloudstack-kvm
For ACS 4.4 - Download syst
CentOS 7 needs to be HVM for XenServer. If you created the VM on XenServer
6.5, then when you register it with CloudStack you'll want to set the
"requireshvm" flag when you import. With CentOS 6, assuming you built it
from the CentOS 6 template, it could be PV or HVM. I've installed directly
fro
I've created the vhd from scratch and registered it through cloudstack API.
Thanks.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote:
> Hi, Leanardo
>
> How did you register VHD at XenServer? using import or creating VM
> from template?
>
> Vadim.
>
> -Original Message-
>
Thanks for sharing this info, I am not the person who asked this question but
I just wanted to
Join in to this thread for our GRE 47 problem and I think we will implement
your solution, ty
-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 24,
Not sure also for newer versions...
But you are trying PPTP server behind VR ? If so - this DID work for me,
though NOT inside ACS, but on physical router, alos static nat from remote
R to my R, and PPTP/RouteOS worked fine...
On 24 March 2015 at 19:44, Sam Ceylani wrote:
> Static NAT didn’t wo
Static NAT didn’t work for us on CS 4.4.1 with windows small business server
VPN feature...
We couldn’t find a solution to GRE 47 problem, I don’t know newer versions of
CS if they implemented this or not.
-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tu
Static NAT ?
On 24 March 2015 at 18:49, Ian Service wrote:
> Looking to add a rule to allow protocol 47 to go through the router, is
> there any way for the user to do this in the cloudstack interface or do we
> need to hack it to make it work. Ideally we'd like to do it properly so
> that the
Looking to add a rule to allow protocol 47 to go through the router, is
there any way for the user to do this in the cloudstack interface or do we
need to hack it to make it work. Ideally we'd like to do it properly so
that the routers continue to be upgradable.
Thanks,
- Ian
Hearty Congrats, Sebastien.
Thank you Hugo for carrying the flag in last 1 year.
Regards,
Sateesh
-Original Message-
From: Giles Sirett [mailto:giles.sir...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 5:11 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org;
market...@cloudst
Hi Daniel
Thanks for sharing this! How do you created a "network offering" with OVS?
I have no "drop down" to select OVS for Static Nat, Port Forwarding like
this:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/_images/ovs-network-offering.png
Cheers
Reto
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Daniel Kol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/24/2015 12:45 PM, Reto Giezendanner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are using CloudStack 4.5.0 with CentOS 7 and have a zone that
> uses advanced networking with GRE isolation method for Guest
> traffic. The problem is, that we cannot enable the OVS pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
Today I wanted to try and build a new zone (on cloudstack 4.5/KVM)
with VXLAN but upon launching it appears to be unable to start the
systemVMs
I constantly got errors of this kind:
Exception while trying to start secondary storage vm
com.clou
Hi all,
We are using CloudStack 4.5.0 with CentOS 7 and have a zone that uses
advanced networking with GRE isolation method for Guest traffic. The
problem is, that we cannot enable the OVS provider, because its not in the
provider list.
Please have a look at the following screenshots:
http://cl.l
We have a customer trying to create a snapshot that runs twice a week.
Wednesday and Sunday.
The problem is, there seems to be no option to do so. Creating 1 weekly
schedule works but then weekly is greyed out and you cannot create another
weekly schedule (which would be the logical way of doi
Spring meeting of CSEUG, kindly hosted by BT
https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/cloudstack-european-user-group-tickets-16282793273
please register early - limited seats
Agenda is TBA - ping me if you have a speaking proposal/idea
Kind Regards
Giles
Giles Sirett
CEO
[Description: Mail Logo Botto
Great proposals Sebastien! Let's AWSAPI, improve code, remove dead code,
cleanup JIRA/RB cleanup and move to Github PR.
I hope we’ll have a better UIs for ACS users soon!
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitt
Congrats Sebastien and thanks Hugo :)
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi <
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Congrats Sebastien!
>
> On 24-Mar-2015, at 9:56 AM, Koushik Das
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats Sebastien and thanks Hugo!
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: G
I found the problem. I doubt anyone else will run into this, but just in case..
Inside vsphere, the cluster was inside of a folder. I do not recall if I put it
there before or after I added the original four hosts to cloudstack. Moving the
cluster out of the folder and directly under the datacen
Hi, Leanardo
How did you register VHD at XenServer? using import or creating VM from
template?
Vadim.
-Original Message-
From: Leandro Mendes [mailto:theflock...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 9:05 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: XenServer (VM_HVM_REQUIRED)
19 matches
Mail list logo
