The setting is set to zone level.
Go to infrastructure manu and the target zone. You will fine the setting
James.
On Sunday, July 12, 2015, Marty J. Sullivan
wrote:
> I searched around and found that you are supposed to set the global
> setting use.local.storage in order to enable local storage
I searched around and found that you are supposed to set the global setting
use.local.storage in order to enable local storage for VM’s. However, the only
setting I see is system.vm.use.local.storage. Has this setting been moved?
Where can I go to enable local storage?
Update - looks like there’s no exposure to the vulnerability for us. The Debian
images we use do not use a vulnerable version of OpenSSL.
Thanks for the patience!
John
On Jul 10, 2015, at 10:19 AM, John Kinsella
mailto:j...@stratosec.co>> wrote:
Folks - just put up a brief blog post about the
Hi,
Did you also set the ‘removed’ column back to NULL (instead of the date/time it
was originally deleted)?
You can migrate directly from XenServer in 4.5.1, no problem. When the
hypervisor connects to CloudStack again it will report its running VMs and
update the data base. I guess there was
Hi I am using 4.5.1. That's why I am upgrading all xenservers to 6.5.
I didn't knew that I can migrate vm from xenservers host itself. I thought that
would make cloudstack database inconsistent, since migration is not initiated
from cloudstack.
And like I said before, those vms have compute of
Hi Sonali,
What version of CloudStack do you use? We can then look at the source at line
292 of DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java If I look at master, it indeed tries
to do something with the compute offerings. Could you also post its specs
(print the result of the select query where you set t
Can anyone help me please?
When I add xenserver host in maintenance, there are 3 VMs which are not getting
migrated to another host in cluster.
Other VMs were moved, but not these three. They both had computer offering
which was removed. But I undeleted those computer offerings, like Andrija P
> On Jul 11, 2015, at 6:04 AM, Keerthiraja SJ wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Can anyone say will the ACS will support docker / RancherOS / CoreOS so
> that we can create a container via cloudstack and assign same as now public
> IP to the container.
>
if you search the archive you will see that we ha
