Thanks, I've added that storage with similar storage tag and that is suitable
now.
-Original Message-
From: Devdeep [mailto:devd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2015 8:57 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: New Primary Storage marked as not suitable
The storage pool
The storage pool is marked as unsuitable probably because the storage tag
on the service/disk offering with which the volume was created do not match
the tag on the new primary storage (PrimaryStorage2). You may try updating
the tag on the new primary and see if it addresses the problem.
Regards,
Hello,
Disk Total on old Primary Storage is 2.8T and new one is 2T (over
provisioning factor is 2). Currently Disk Allocated is only 5G on second
storage but old one hast 2.5T Disk Allocated.
-Original Message-
From: Suresh Sadhu [mailto:suresh.sa...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, November 1
Does the secondary primary storage has enough storage?. I think it showing
warning as not suitable because its volume size may be more(after applying
default thin provisioning factor i.e. multiple by 2) than destination storage
but while doing migration it won't check the storage capacity(t
David,
Cross host private network (CHPN) performance in XenServer will be slower
than VXLAN because traffic in the GRE tunnel is encrypted. At the time
CHPN was implemented in 2010, VXLAN wasn't as well established as it is
today, and we had a requirement of the communication being private. Ther
Hi Remi,
I really apprecciate your comments.
If i have understood correctly, it is possible to use OVS with STT tunnels over
CS. Is that correct?
David
-Mensaje original-
> De: "Remi Bergsma"
> A: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Fecha: 05/11/2015 09:52
> Asunto: Re: Re[2]: GRE Iso
Hello,
I've added a new Primary storage with tag "PrimaryStorage2" and going to
replace it with the old one with the tag "PrimaryStorage1". Both of them are
VMFS and similar, but when I try to migrate volumes from PrimaryStorage1,
the new PrimaryStorage2 has a "not suitable" mark in pop up wind
