Re: SSVM and CPVM

2015-11-24 Thread Remi Bergsma
Indeed, that’s important. Make sure you run java7 and not java8. On 24/11/15 18:39, "Yiping Zhang" wrote: >Which version of OS and java are you using ? > >We had encountered a similar error before. AFAICT, we were running RHEL 6.5 >and CS 4.3.2 at the time on a newly setup management server.

Re: SSVM and CPVM

2015-11-24 Thread Yiping Zhang
Which version of OS and java are you using ? We had encountered a similar error before. AFAICT, we were running RHEL 6.5 and CS 4.3.2 at the time on a newly setup management server. The java version installed was IBM version when we saw this error. Once we changed java package back to java-1

Re: upgrading 4.5.2 -> 4.6.0 virtualrouter upgrade timeout

2015-11-24 Thread Stephan Seitz
Update / FYI: After faking the particular VRu in sql, I tried to restart that network, and it always fails. To me it looks like the update_config.py - which takes almost all cpu ressources - runs way longer any watchdog will accept. I'm able to mitigate that by very nasty workarounds: a) start the

secondary storage migration feature

2015-11-24 Thread Jochim, Ingo
I heard about discussions for secondary storage migration feature. Is that something what comes in one of the next releases? Regards, Ingo -- This email was Virus checked by UTM 9. http://www.sophos.com

upgrading 4.5.2 -> 4.6.0 virtualrouter upgrade timeout

2015-11-24 Thread Stephan Seitz
Hi List! After upgrading from 4.5.2 to 4.6.0 I faced a problem with one virtualrouter. This particular VR has about 10 IPs w/ LB and FW rules defined. During the upgrade process, and after about 4-5 minutes a watchdog kicks in and kills the respective VR due to no response. So far I didn't find a

VM batch deployment in CS 4.6.0 is slower than in CS 4.5.2

2015-11-24 Thread Qian Shaohua
Hi, We create 40 VMs in a network concurrently by cloudmonkey in CS 4.6.0. It is slower than in CS 4.5.2. The agent log shows the VR tooks more time to process CS commands. It seems that the more VMs the worse. Any idea? Our env: CS 4.6.0/4.5.2 + KVM(CentOS 6.5) -- Qian

Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan

2015-11-24 Thread Vadim Kimlaychuk
Keerhiraja, This one exists: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7446, but is connected to OVS component that is a part of PVLAN functionality. Vadim. On 2015-11-24 11:06, Keerthiraja SJ wrote: Regarding this issue is anyone raised issue in Jira if so please provide me it

RE: SSVM and CPVM

2015-11-24 Thread Suresh Sadhu
Perform yum update nss on your Manageemnt server or downgrade your java version then restart your MS.Hope that addresses your problem Regards Sadhu -Original Message- From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 2:50 PM To: users

Re: SSVM and CPVM

2015-11-24 Thread Abhinandan Prateek
Check the ‘host’ name entry in configuration table (or global settings via UI). This is the ip that ssvm/cpvm will use to try to connect back to MS. Make sure that it is reachable and points to MS. Abhinandan Prateek S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +91 97011 99011 abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com

Re: CS 4.5 + XEN 6.5 using bond and pvlan

2015-11-24 Thread Keerthiraja SJ
Regarding this issue is anyone raised issue in Jira if so please provide me it will help me to follow. Thanks, Keerthi On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote: > Dear Stavros, > > We also use XS 6.5 with bonding(active-backup) and VLANs, but this > discussion is about PVLAN

Re: Up-graduation of CS 4.3.1 to 4.6.0

2015-11-24 Thread Remi Bergsma
You need the 4.5 and 4.6 systemvm templates when upgrading (will be fixed in 4.6.1). We tried upgrading from 4.4 and that works. Do you use xenserver? There were many changes in 4.4 regarding xenha. Be sure to check that. Testing it in a lab before actually performing the upgrade is always a