> Op 24 augustus 2016 om 7:47 schreef Makrand :
>
>
> Guys,
>
> I am not sure on overall developer talk, but let me understand something
> here.
>
> Bit about setup:-
> So, at my new work place, we already have 5 zones (each zone with its own
> management server) with management node running o
> Op 24 augustus 2016 om 6:38 schreef John Burwell :
>
>
> Wido,
>
> My only issue is dropping for any distro between patch releases. If someone
> is running 4.9.0.0 on Ubuntu 12.04, and they need to update to 4.9.1.0+ (e.g.
> to get a CVE fix), they will be stranded. This failure seems to
Guys,
I am not sure on overall developer talk, but let me understand something
here.
Bit about setup:-
So, at my new work place, we already have 5 zones (each zone with its own
management server) with management node running on Ubuntu 12.04. ACS 4.4.2
and XENserver 6.2. It was setup by someone w
Wido,
My only issue is dropping for any distro between patch releases. If someone is
running 4.9.0.0 on Ubuntu 12.04, and they need to update to 4.9.1.0+ (e.g. to
get a CVE fix), they will be stranded. This failure seems to fail the Law of
Least Surprise. While I recognize that it is unlikel
I would choose (thinking about redundancy):
2 Storage + Management (one NIC is standby)
2 Guest
2 Public
But the following would ensure all 6 NICs would work constantly:
1 Storage
1 Management
2 Guest
2 Public
(in general) I would choose some of the 2 options above.
Let's say that your environ
Venkatesh,
Did you follow this :
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.9.0/upgrade/upgrade-4.8.html#install-new-mysql-connector
?
Install new MySQL connector
Apache CloudStack 4.9 require an upgrade of the MySQL connector on
CentOS. Starting with 4.9
Venkatesh,
I think you need EPEL as a repository to install mysql-connector-python. Try
'yum install epel-release' and then try again.
Regards,
Jacob Seeley
Sr. Infrastructure Engineer
VertitechIT
413-268-1631
www.vertitechit.com
-Original Message-
From: kotipalli venkatesh [mailto:ve
HI All,
I am installing cloudstack 4.9 but no luck because some package dependency
issue.
OS : Centos 6.8
BaseURL: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/centos/6/4.9/
*Below Error we are getting while installation* :
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security
Setting up Install Proces
Since I've 6 NIC for each Server, which is the best config?
2 Management
2 Storage + Guest
2 Public
??
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Gabriel Beims Bräscher <
gabr...@autonomiccs.com.br> wrote:
> I would say that it depends on how critical is your environment, and if
> the storage and managem
I would say that it depends on how critical is your environment, and if
the storage and management are suffering from low throughput.
If the main focus is redundancy, keeping management + storage in a bond
of 2 NICs is worth (considering that you would not have other 2 NICs
free to use and mak
Ok, so do you think that the best config is to keep management network separate
from storage?
If in next cluster I’ll move storage network to another bond, do you think I’ll
able to use both NIC for throughput?
Da: Gabriel Beims Bräscher
Looking at the section 4.3.5.1. Active-Active Bonding from documentation of
the XenServer 6.5:
"Management or storage traffic. Only one of the links (NICs) in the
bond is active and the other NICs remain
unused unless traffic fails over to them. Configuring a management
interface or second
Are you using Active/Passive bond? (This is the bonding where only one NIC
carries the traffic, others NICs are there just in case the first fails; in
this case is normal other NICs stay as standby.)
XenServer provides support for both, Active/Passive and Active/Active (VM
traffic balanced between
Mmm... LACP provide load balancing so I should have 2 channel with 1 Gbps
throughput...
In fact, running this command from an XS server, I'm expecting to see both
NIC "working":
time dd if=/dev/zero of=/var/run/sr-mount/UUID/testfile bs=4k count=30
But I see only 1 NIC with high traffic, the
Thanks Ilya,
I'll test that, I'm still wondering how to create the network offering in
cloudstack shared or guest network, I'll keep you posted...
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:46 PM, ilya wrote:
> And interface config would look like this
>
> root@rn2-gcs-np-pod14-lhv20:/etc/sysconfig/network
Ingo
I spoke to Marco (one of the organisers from this community) yesterday as, like
you, I find it really frustrating that this has been postposed last minute
(like you, I had made plans) But the reasons for having to do so, as far as I
understand, were forced on them last minute and they've tr
Hi all,
is there any update here?
We have booked flights and hotels already.
We also registered for a speech.
There is no response so far.
Regards,
Ingo
Von: Audrey Roberto B Baldin [audrey.bal...@unitelco.com.br]
Gesendet: Montag, 22. August 2016 15:40
A
> Op 23 augustus 2016 om 11:38 schreef Rohit Yadav :
>
>
> Historically, CloudStack's debian/deb packages/repositories have never been
> supported by the initial authors. For example, initial ACS version and all
> CCP releases never shipped deb packages, nor in our (old and recent)
> document
Historically, CloudStack's debian/deb packages/repositories have never been
supported by the initial authors. For example, initial ACS version and all CCP
releases never shipped deb packages, nor in our (old and recent) documentation
we promote installation/running CloudStack on Debian/Ubuntu. A
Hi,
The management server produces no errors when starting as the last entry
was the error I first posted. HAProxy shows that port 8080 is UP on both
servers but 8250 is DOWN. 3306 is UP as well.
cloudstack-setup-databases shows OK all the way and ends with "CloudStack
has successfully initialize
20 matches
Mail list logo
