Re: Secondary storage is not secondary properly

2017-08-14 Thread Asanka Gunasekara
Hi Guys, what would happen if i change the column in the table VM_instance, to Destroyed or running :( On 15 Aug 2017 8:28 am, "Asanka Gunasekara" wrote: > Hi Guys, when a system VM is in start state in ui, it does not give any > option to delete stop start etc. What if it to change db entry of

Re: Secondary storage is not secondary properly

2017-08-14 Thread Asanka Gunasekara
Hi Guys, when a system VM is in start state in ui, it does not give any option to delete stop start etc. What if it to change db entry of the system VMS to running state. Will it give me the option to destroy? If so what would be the database relation? Thanks and regards Asanka On 15 Aug 2017 6:

Re: Secondary storage is not secondary properly

2017-08-14 Thread Asanka Gunasekara
Hi Dag, I deleted both the system VMs and from the cloudstack it says starting but I dont see the the VM been generated, now its since more than 12 houres Thanks and Regards Asanka On 10 August 2017 at 21:47, Asanka Gunasekara wrote: > Thank you Dag, > > > On 10 Aug 2017 3:09 am, "Dag Sonstebo

Re: CS VLAN configuration in a Cisco 3560 switch

2017-08-14 Thread Simon Weller
Luis, So Cisco don't use tagged/untagged. You build the vlan (or vlan range) and then apply it to a trunk interface. The 'native' keyword in the interface 'switchport trunk native' stanza sets the default untagged vlan for that particular port. Try something like this: vlan 65 name public

CS VLAN configuration in a Cisco 3560 switch

2017-08-14 Thread Luis
Hi I have a question, following the manual for an advance networking I am trying to configure VLAN's in a Cisco 3560 but i am cofuse, is this all I need Can somebody post a complete example base on their experience? Thank you. This is what I have untagged  VLAN 65 for public traffice tagged VLAN

Fwd: Error on uploading a SSL Certificate with cloudmonkey

2017-08-14 Thread Dennis Meyer
Hi, i want to implement SSL offloading on the vpc router loadbalancer, referencing on this ticket: https://issues.apache. org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4821 it should be implemented with version 4.3. And following this document: https://cwiki.apache .org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSL+Termination+

Re: KVM evaluation

2017-08-14 Thread Luis
Hi I use to run a Basic Set Up of CS 4.6 with KVM, I never had a problem running different distributions of Ubuntu, CentOS, Windows XP, Vista or 2012, CS running on Ubuntu 14.04 and two host with CentOS 6.2, I also tried XenServer 6.5, I had a good experience now I am trying to do an Advance ins

KVM evaluation

2017-08-14 Thread S . Brüseke - proIO GmbH
Hi, we want to give KVM a change in our CS installation. Can somebody provide his/her experience? - Which version of KVM are you using? - What host OS are you running KVM on? - What do you tweak on your KVM installations? Thank you very much for sharing this information! Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Re: Error on Terraform with creating many networks

2017-08-14 Thread Simon Weller
Dennis, Cloudstack is an Orchestrator, so it works well with all of the major hypervisors (KVM, XenServer, VMWare et al). Each hypervisor has it's own limitations and all of them work slightly differently in terms of how they support various features. - Si

Re: Error on Terraform with creating many networks

2017-08-14 Thread Dennis Meyer
Is this limitation only on XenServer? What Hypervisor works best with CloudStack? 2017-08-14 13:27 GMT+02:00 Paul Angus : > XenServer only supports 7 vNICs on a guest which obviously limits the > number of tiers, and although vSphere supports 10, there seems to be a code > bug which means guests

RE: Error on Terraform with creating many networks

2017-08-14 Thread Paul Angus
XenServer only supports 7 vNICs on a guest which obviously limits the number of tiers, and although vSphere supports 10, there seems to be a code bug which means guests can't start if they have more than 7 NICs attached (although you can attach more once the instances has started). Kind regard

Re: Error on Terraform with creating many networks

2017-08-14 Thread Rene Moser
Hi Dennis On 08/14/2017 11:46 AM, Dennis Meyer wrote: > Hi, > i try to create a vpc and some networks with terraform. Not sure but wasn't there a issue with more than (or equal 8) VPC networks? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK- However, not sure which versions of cloudstack

Error on Terraform with creating many networks

2017-08-14 Thread Dennis Meyer
Hi, i try to create a vpc and some networks with terraform. Thats my main.tf: # creating the vpc resource "cloudstack_vpc" "myvpc" { name = "myvpc" cidr = "10.230.0.0/16" vpc_offering = "Default VPC offering" zone = "${var.zone}" project = "${var.project

Re: CloudStack-UI 1.0.7 released on July, 25, 2017

2017-08-14 Thread Ivan Kudryavtsev
Hi, Rene. Thanks for update. I forwarded it to the team. We'll try to fix it ASAP and update release. 2017-08-14 16:29 GMT+07:00 Rene Moser : > Hi Ivan > > Thanks for your update! Appreciate the progress. > > > Just a note after a quick test: It seems there is an error in the docker > image, I wa

Re: CloudStack-UI 1.0.7 released on July, 25, 2017

2017-08-14 Thread Rene Moser
Hi Ivan Thanks for your update! Appreciate the progress. Just a note after a quick test: It seems there is an error in the docker image, I was not able to start a container with 1.0.7, but the very same command works with 1.0.6. $ docker logs cloudstack-ui 2017/08/14 09:27:12 [emerg] 13#13:

CloudStack-UI 1.0.7 released on July, 25, 2017

2017-08-14 Thread Ivan Kudryavtsev
If you don't see a properly marked document and would like to see the same press release with images, follow the link: https://github.com/bwsw/cloudstack-ui/wiki/107-ReleaseNotes-En Release 1.0.7 Overview On August 8, 2017 we released CloudStack-UI 1.0.7. This is experimental release. We do not r