Re: HTTPS LB and x-forwarded-for

2017-11-08 Thread Wido den Hollander
> Op 8 november 2017 om 14:59 schreef Pierre-Luc Dion : > > > Same challenge here too! > > Let's look at improving Load-balancing offering from cloudstack, I guest we > should do a feature spec draft soon.., from my perspective, doing SSL > offload on the VR could be problematic if the VR spec

HA Storage Solution

2017-11-08 Thread William Alianto
Hi, I'm currently still learning about ACS deployment. I have seen about the solution for HA management server and hypervisor, but I still don't know how to create HA storage cluster for Primary and Secondary storage. I would think of making HA NFS storage using HA proxy or maybe using somethin

Re: Anyone try to run cloudstack on google cloud?

2017-11-08 Thread Jay Hahn-Steichen
Training. Sandboxing. Experimentation/POC And if there is no usecase for it, someone better tell the vendors who are supporting it! Quite a few now -- google is not the first. AWS does it via a third party. I have used skytap for training purposes etc... --jay hahn-steichen On Wed, Nov 8

RE: HTTPS LB and x-forwarded-for

2017-11-08 Thread Paul Angus
Playing devils advocate, Is this really CloudStack's job? If an end-user wants a really high performance load-balancer, shouldn't they use a virtualised NetScaler/F5/KEMP.. whatever. I definitely would like to see us enable the passthrough of more host processor features to guests though.

RE: HTTPS LB and x-forwarded-for

2017-11-08 Thread Simon Weller
I'm assuming we would have the standard openssl version with Intel TLS offload though, right? RHEL ships their FIPS compliant version that strips all the acceleration out. The cpu instruction sets should be passed through from the host, so hopefully that will make a massive difference to decrypt

Re: HTTPS LB and x-forwarded-for

2017-11-08 Thread Pierre-Luc Dion
Same challenge here too! Let's look at improving Load-balancing offering from cloudstack, I guest we should do a feature spec draft soon.., from my perspective, doing SSL offload on the VR could be problematic if the VR spec if too small, and the default spec of the VR being 1vcpu@256MB, consider

Re: Anyone try to run cloudstack on google cloud?

2017-11-08 Thread Dag Sonstebo
Hi Jay, Can you elaborate why you would want to do this? Running a cloud IaaS platform nested inside another public IaaS platform doesn’t really have a real world use case. Regards, Dag Sonstebo Cloud Architect ShapeBlue On 08/11/2017, 07:50, "Jay Hahn-Steichen" wrote: All: Has

Anyone try to run cloudstack on google cloud?

2017-11-08 Thread Jay Hahn-Steichen
All: Has anyone succeeded in getting cloudstack to operate on google cloud. A couple of months ago google cloud announced support of nested virtualization. I have gotten a quick install to work -- the two system VMs are up and running. It fails when I attempt to add a template evidently because