I am able to view the disk in linux vm centos. The same not working in
windows. Do i need to install any additional package in windows server?
I tried rebooting the windows vm didnt work.
Please help!!
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:56 AM, soundar rajan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created a 5 GB volume
What hypervisor the windows vm is deployed on?
Regards,
Sateesh
-Original Message-
From: soundar rajan
Reply-To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org"
Date: Friday, 6 April 2018 at 12:59 PM
To: "d...@cloudstack.apache.org" ,
"users@cloudstack.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Attached volume is not
hypervisor deployed on KVM centos
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi <
sateesh.chodapune...@accelerite.com> wrote:
> What hypervisor the windows vm is deployed on?
>
> Regards,
> Sateesh
>
> -Original Message-
> From: soundar rajan
> Reply-To: "users@cloudstack.apache.
Hi Parth,
Keep in mind you are in unchartered waters – so there may be some stumbling
blocks before you get this to work.
I suspect what you have to do is change cloudbr1 such that it is backed by a
fake or dummy ethernet interface. What seems to happen is the agent script
looks for the networ
Thanks guys, got it fixed by installing the virto drivers from fedora site
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:56 PM, soundar rajan
wrote:
> hypervisor deployed on KVM centos
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi <
> sateesh.chodapune...@accelerite.com> wrote:
>
>> What hypervisor the wi
Hi Dag,
Thanks for the response. I am currently looking into VLANs and network
configuration for my case. But I want to know one thing: are "untagged"
VLAN networks sufficient for an advanced zone to function with two
networks? I did not state I do not want to use VLANs for networking but I
wanted
Hi Parth,
Take a look through the full email trail – I think we discussed this earlier
on. In short the answer is no – by definition you can not run completely
untagged isolated networks in an advanced zone – but “tagged” means different
things for L2 and L3 isolation. The real answer - “it dep
Hi Dag,
Stephan and I posted the issues we encountered after upgrading to 4.11
on https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues.
Those are:
Admin Dashboard System Capacity broken with German Locale #2539
problem adding new shared network NIC to VM "A NIC with this MAC address
exits for network:" #
Hi Dag,
Thank you for guiding me, i know it's a weird use case and probably would
never be required in a production environment. I will definitely try to
make a dummy interface and give it to the guest network target bridge. I
know it would be out of the scope of this email trail for you to explai
Hi Parth,
No problem, glad I could help. Let us know how you get on with the dummy
interface bridge.
With regards to your tagging question – yes this is quite a big and complicated
topic. Suffice to summarise it as follows:
- Basic zones use a larger L3 network, and guest isolation is done by
Hi Melanie and Stephan,
Thanks for logging and glad none of these are show stoppers for you.
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue
On 06/04/2018, 13:07, "Melanie Desaive" wrote:
Hi Dag,
Stephan and I posted the issues we encountered after upgrading to 4.11
on https:
11 matches
Mail list logo
