回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-03 Thread li jerry
Hi Rohit Yes, I didn't specify a port when I added primary storage; After r failed, I checked with virsh and found that the pool had been created successfully, and the capacity, allocation and available of RBD could be displayed. So I'm sure it's not the wrong key. Please note that: In the ou

Re: CloudStack on Debian?

2021-01-03 Thread Daan Hoogland
Pieter, It is not unsupported in the strict "proven not to work" sense. We just don't have a user base validating the support. given expertise there will be a way to make it work if it doesn't out of the box. regards, On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 8:33 PM Pieter Koorts wrote: > Does or will CloudStack

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-03 Thread Daan Hoogland
Thanks for the PR Jerry, Can you try Rohit's way. He seems to provide a way, making this not a blocker. On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 7:22 AM li jerry wrote: > I'm creating PR to fix this. > > I think we should block, because it will cause the RBD primary storage to > be unable to be added. > > -邮件

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-03 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi Jerry, Can you see my reply? I'm able to add a RBD primary storage if I specify the port, should we still consider it a blocker then? Regards. From: li jerry Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 12:52 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev Subject: 回复: [VOTE] A

回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-03 Thread li jerry
I'm creating PR to fix this. I think we should block, because it will cause the RBD primary storage to be unable to be added. -邮件原件- 发件人: Daan Hoogland 发送时间: 2021年1月4日 14:57 收件人: users 抄送: dev 主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3] looks good Jerry, Are you making a P

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-03 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi Jerry, I've tested 4.15RC3 by creating and adding a new ceph storage pool (ceph version 15.2.7 (88e41c6c49beb18add4fdb6b4326ca466d931db8) octopus (stable)) using both legacy and new UI and it seems to work okay, the only problem could be if you accidentally give a wrong secret in which case

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-03 Thread Daan Hoogland
looks good Jerry, Are you making a PR? It seems to me that this would not be a blocker and should go in future releases. Please argue against me if you disagree. On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 6:48 AM li jerry wrote: > - Is this a setup that does work with a prior version? > - Did you fresh install or u

回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-03 Thread li jerry
- Is this a setup that does work with a prior version? - Did you fresh install or upgrade? No, This is a new deployment, there are no upgrades I have changed two methods. At present, RBD storage is running /cloud-plugin-hypervisor-kvm/src/main/java/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtStorag

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-03 Thread Daan Hoogland
Jerry, - Is this a setup that does work with a prior version? - Did you fresh install or upgrade? @list is there any RDB user that can advise on the missing configuration causing the NumberFormatException, please? On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 1:25 PM li jerry wrote: > Happy New Year to all. > > > Sor

Re: Change IP address for ConsoleProxy and SecondaryStorageVM IP

2021-01-03 Thread Hean Seng
Do you know which table is this? I changed to table console_proxy table, but after destroy and turn on back , it will get back the old ip . On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 6:41 PM Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote: > Well, it could be like that, other way is only to fix it thru db, but it's > not a supported way.

CloudStack on Debian?

2021-01-03 Thread Pieter Koorts
Does or will CloudStack be officially supporting base Debian? Currently CentOS and Ubuntu are recommended on the documentation for 4.14. Is this because of compatibility and packages or other reasons? I don't see why it can't work with Debian since Ubuntu is based on it but wanted to check.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-03 Thread li jerry
Happy New Year to all. Sorry, I can't add RBD primary storage when I deploy with 4.15 RC3 CloudStack: 4.15 RC3 OS : Ubuntu 20.04.01 DB: MYSQL 8.0.22 CEPH: 15.2.8 libvirt:6.0.0 hypervisor: QEMU 4.2.1 Add main memory to report the following error: 2021-01-03 13:15:32,605 DEBUG [cloud.agent.

Re: Change IP address for ConsoleProxy and SecondaryStorageVM IP

2021-01-03 Thread Ivan Kudryavtsev
Well, it could be like that, other way is only to fix it thru db, but it's not a supported way. вс, 3 янв. 2021 г., 15:55 Hean Seng : > i tried destry it. but when re-built back, it getting the same IP > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 4:46 PM Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote: > > > Hi, just destroy them. > > >

Re: Change IP address for ConsoleProxy and SecondaryStorageVM IP

2021-01-03 Thread Hean Seng
i tried destry it. but when re-built back, it getting the same IP On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 4:46 PM Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote: > Hi, just destroy them. > > вс, 3 янв. 2021 г., 14:12 Hean Seng : > > > Hi > > > > > > Is there any way to change IP for ConsoleProxy or SecondaryVM ? > > > > In the SystemV

Re: Change IP address for ConsoleProxy and SecondaryStorageVM IP

2021-01-03 Thread Ivan Kudryavtsev
Hi, just destroy them. вс, 3 янв. 2021 г., 14:12 Hean Seng : > Hi > > > Is there any way to change IP for ConsoleProxy or SecondaryVM ? > > In the SystemVm Detail Page, I did not see any place to Change IP . > > > -- > Regards, > Hean Seng >