Andrija,
Thanks so much for all the details. I'm out of the office for the next
couple of days so will update my cloud with your suggestions when I get
back.
As far as the "fancy" naming, I just never found names like bondX useful
when Linux allows naming the network device something else.
Hi
I have mysql hang, and restarted mysql, restarted cloudstack mgmt, and
usage.
After that facing issue of following:
duration is 120 minutes)
2021-06-18 04:25:49,656 DEBUG [cloud.usage.UsageManagerImpl]
(Usage-HB-1:null) (logid:) Scheduling Usage job...
2021-06-18 04:25:49,657 INFO
@Rohit Yadav we might have a UI blocker, I'm
waiting for Mike to report the issue - it seems (per his separate email to
this ML) that the Traffic Labels are not persisted after the Zone
deployment (UI doesn't show traffic labels) - I do recall an issue in
4.15.0 where similar was happening and
Thanks Yordan, nice PR!
Best,
On Sun, 30 May 2021 at 16:03, Yordan Kostov wrote:
> Dear everyone,
>
> Did a draft on Creating Linux template guide you can find it here
> - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/215.
> A separate page has been done that can be
If you read the last few blog lines more carefully you will notice only the
KEY name should be in the allowed list, not the value itself - so just
"HVM-boot-params:order" - if this doesn't work, then there might be a bug
(due to column sign - so please test if you can use/reproduce the same
There is something wrong there, and you should not, to my knowledge, have
issues with IDs (but I don't recall I have checked this ever)
Before "cloning" the row from user_ip_address table - please make sure you
are cloning an empty record, not the one which is "used" and alter clean up
things -
BTW, once you thing you have fixed all your network configuration issues -
destroy all system VM (CPVM, SSVM and restart all networks with "cleanup" -
so that new VMs are created_
Inside SSVM, run the the following script, which should give you results
similar as below - confirming that your SSVM
Since you really bothered to provide so very detailed inputs and help us
help you (vs what some other people tend to do) - I think you really
deserved a decent answer (and some explanation).
The last question first -even though you don't specify/have dedicated
Storage traffic, there will be an
@Corey, Mike
can you please raise a GH issue with the same description, and also vote -1
on the RC2 release, with the link to that GH issue?
THanks,
Andrija
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 18:09, Corey, Mike
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for pushing this out. I'm looking forward to trying the
>
Hi,
Thanks for pushing this out. I'm looking forward to trying the
template/instance deployment in my VMware PILOT.
A couple items I noticed off the "new" build are:
1 - During zone creation with VMware and setting up the physical networks -
adding the traffic label to use a VDS does NOT
Hello Andrei,
As yourself noticed, ACS has a hardcoded threshold for secondary
storages. In cases that the secondary storage has large capacities, 10%
can mean a lot of storage. There is an open PR
(https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4790) that externalize this
threshold to allow
Hi Andrei,
Can you test 4.15.1.0 RC2 which is up for voting/testing and if you're able to
reproduce the issue, please file a bugreport if it's not same as
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4797
#4747 is Ceph specific which unfortunately I don't have an environment to test
again but
Hi Yordan,
We do have a backup & recovery framework which can be extended to implement
support for new solutions, the current provider/plugin is available only for
Vmware/Veeam and which can be used to implement support for other backup
solutions for other hypervisors.
While there is no
Hi all,
I've compared the delete of snapshots between 4.13 and 4.15.1. The main
difference is that when picking the snapshot strategy in 4.13, the deletion
is handled by XenserverSnapshotStrategy (renamed DefaultSnapshotStrategy in
the newer versions), and for 4.15.1 is handled by
Hi Andrei,
I appreciate all the efforts and the help in narrowing down this issue. It
looks similar and probably it is related to bug #4797 indeed.
This bug is for some time to be fixed and I perfectly understand why you
are not happy.
I am speaking for myself here and I am not the Release
Hi Suresh,
This is what I've answered on the db tables:
The table snapshots has NULL under the removed column in all snapshots that
I've
removed. The table snapshot_store_ref has no such column, but the state
shown
as Destroyed.
I've done some more checking under the ssvm itself,
Hi Andrei,
Have you checked the 'status' and 'removed' timestamp in snapshots table, and
'state' in snapshot_store_ref table for these snapshots.
Similar issue logged (by Ed, as mentioned in his email) here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4797. Is it the same issue?
Regards,
Hi Suresh, Please see below the answers to your questions.
- Original Message -
> From: "Suresh Anaparti"
> To: "users"
> Sent: Thursday, 17 June, 2021 06:36:27
> Subject: Re: Snapshots are not working after upgrading to 4.15.0
> Hi Andrei,
>
> Can you check if the storage garbage
Hi Guys,
I have already logged this as a big under reference: 4797
Ed
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 06:37, Suresh Anaparti
wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> Can you check if the storage garbage collector is enabled or not in your
> env (specified using the global setting 'storage.cleanup.enabled'). If it
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
