Hi everyone,
today i would need some ideas on how to provide several (in my case two)
public networks to a account.
my "customer" would like to see a kind of dual - wan from his point of
view.
Currently i am working with one physical public network where i use vlans
for logical separation.
How ev
I've built my own cloud on the cheap with two nodes (less than $500 US shipped).
One was a compute node
One for everything else including storage.
Setup:
used KVM for VMs
simple networking
NFS for primary and secondary storage
only 250GB storage
Most recently I've installed on Ubuntu 20 L
Hi Jordan,
I have no idea what caused the issue. The default cpu/ram for virtual
routers is small, but enough for most cases.
There are two options to change the service offering of VR:
(1) create a new network offering, with specified router offering, then
update the network to the new offering.
Daan,
I see from the documentation that this is a new API for ACS 4.15. Do you have
an example command line that I should inject this "deployasis" flag?
Thanks!
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland
Sent: Friday, October 1, 2021 11:18 AM
To: users
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.o
Hi guys, how are you?.
We are testing a solution with ACS 4.15.1 with Gluster 9.3. We use a
host with Ubuntu and when we try to start a VM we get an error.
Host detail:
lsb_release-aNoLSBmodulesareavailable.Distributor
ID:UbuntuDescription:Ubuntu20.10Release:20.10Codename:groovyqemu-img--ver
Here are a few considerations:
- First snapshot of volume is always full snap.
- XenServer/XCP-NG backups are always thin.
- Thin provisioning calculations never go down. Even if you delete data from
disk.
As you filled the disk of the VM to top the thin provisioning threats it as
full VM from
Hi,
I've a question about the snapshots volume in Cloudstack
When we take a snapshot of a volume, this create a VHD file on the secondary
storage.
Snapshot size doesn't match volume size used.
Imagine a volume of 20GB, we fill the volume and empty it just after.
We take a snapshot of the volume
Hi Daan.
Thanks for your quick reply.
I see.., 15 is user allowed. didn't read the description good enough 😊
I have never created any roles. I tried the -D option with
migrate-dynamicroles.py
Med vennlig hilsen
David Larsen
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Daan Hoogland
Sendt: mandag
Hey everyone,
Environment is 4.15 ACS + XCP-NG 8.2 on fiber shared storage.
I notice a strange VR behavior happening once in a while (~10
mins or so) . The virtual router is generating significant amount of usage on
the storage for about 1 min or so.
David,
The '=15's mean user is allowed, as 15 = 8+4=2=1 (it is a decimal
description of a bit-field)
Have you created any roles along the way?
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 4:51 PM David Larsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have tried to migrate our Cloudstack (4.15) to use dynamic roles. The
> migrate process wen
V,
As Wei implies, it will be created when it is needed. For an empty network
(in principle), no. When you create your first VM the router will be
created.
You can associate the VMs with a second shared network, yes.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 3:35 PM Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you use the default
Hi
I have tried to migrate our Cloudstack (4.15) to use dynamic roles. The migrate
process went ok, but users can't log in afterwards...(?).
When they log in, the only response they get is "discovering..."
I had to go back to commands.properties.
What are the default user roles when using dyn
Hi Loth,
I know some setup with 3-nodes mariadb cluster and nginx (not haproxy)
which work fine.
Could you please share more information, for example mariadb status, error
logs in cloudstack management ?
-Wei
On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 at 07:29, Loth wrote:
> Hi Users,
>
> I am seeing some deadlocks
Hi,
Great, looking forward to your article.
If you make some code changes, please create a PR for review and testing.
-Wei
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 at 13:38, vas...@gmx.de wrote:
> With this level of knowledge i can say yes, works like expected.
>
> Overall i have to admitt, that this kind of implem
Hi,
Do you use the default shared network offering for the network ?
-Wei
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 at 15:21, V Viceri wrote:
> Hi Daan,
>
> Thank you for noticing my issue. This is for a Shared network. I haven't
> also tried any other workaround as I do not want to lose everything if a
> mess up th
Hi Daan,
Thank you for noticing my issue. This is for a Shared network. I haven't also
tried any other workaround as I do not want to lose everything if a mess up the
whole configuration.
Does adding a new Shared network create a new VR?
If so, what will happen to the old VMs associated to the
V,
Is this a vpc router, a router for an isolated network, or for a shared
network?
if it is for an isolated network a router should be spinnen up as soon as
you add a VM. you can delete the VM again once it is running. On the other
types of networks I wouldn't know a good workaround. And this is o
Loth,
I think you are better off asking this question on a mysql forum,
somewhere. It doesn't seem anybody worked with a 3-node cluster, here.
On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 7:29 AM Loth wrote:
> Hi Users,
>
> I am seeing some deadlocks in my sql error log;
> "[ERROR] mysqld: Deadlock found when trying
never heard of this Piotr,
Have you checked the timezone and locale settings on the hosts?
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:10 AM Piotr Pisz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a strange situation, I have two CS clusters (in the same version),
> and each gives the prometheus stats differently.
> In the last fi
With this level of knowledge i can say yes, works like expected.
Overall i have to admitt, that this kind of implementation is something i
will have to get used to :-D
Untill now I have been working with the "stateless" ACL approach. Also the
"mixing" of in- and egress rule can be a bit overwhelmi
Hi,
Good findings. Thanks for sharing.
Do you think it works as what you expected?
-Wei
On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 at 23:41, vas...@gmx.de wrote:
> Thanks for this Wei,
> thant helped me out!
>
> I will share my findings - maybe someone googling for some more information
> regarding the ACLs will fin
Hi All,
Just now my cloudstack installation decided to expunge my virtual router from
some unknown reasons and I cannot bring it back either by issuing the
restartNetwork or starting/stopping existing VMs. Please advise
Logs:
2021-10-04 14:05:12,027 DEBUG [c.c.c.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl]
(conso
22 matches
Mail list logo
