Hi all,
Firstly I would like to thank to everyone who attended the Cloudstack
Collaboration Conference in Sofia, Bulgaria last week. You made a great event
and cannot wait to see you all again soon.
I am writing just to confirm that:
- I submitted the form for a stand at Fossdem
- our community
Hello Bryan,
Cloudstack gives you super awesome API feature, so yes you run run a Jenkins
job to provision instances on target host. So you can achieve this via 2 method.
1- Create compute offering in ACS and provide some tag and that tag should be
present on the HOST as well, i.e one offering
Hi Vivek,
Thank for the response.
Which of these would be the most recommended method? In terms of simplification
and efficient maintenance?
What about CI/CD? Is it possible to integrate our CICD pipeline to deploy 2
instances of the same app to 2 different physical servers? If so, I suppose i
Hi Nicolas
On my working zone it shows the same:
root@v-47-VM:~# telnet public_ip 5900
Trying kvm_public_ip...
Connected to 41.72.146.218.
Escape character is '^]'.
RFB 003.008
Both my kvm hosts have the same qemu/libvirt versions too. The issue
seems to boil down to my routing. I tested ot
Hi Granwille,
I see the RFB version offered by the VNC server is 3.8, and the CPVM currently
can handle up to 3.3. Can you compare on your working zone the output of the
telnet to a VNC working port? Is there any difference on the qemu/libvirt
configurations on the hosts from each zone?
Regard
Hi
Its running on the KVM server:
root@hostname ~ $ grep -w 5900 /etc/services
rfb 5900/tcp # Remote Framebuffer
rfb 5900/udp # Remote Framebuffer
root@hostname ~ $
I stopped the firewall and was able to connect to the VNC service from
the
Networking can get tricky, especially if you want to be too smart about
it, it will bite back.
Anyway, VNC port 5900, is that even listening on the hypervisor, what is
ss/netstat saying?
Try to find an existing port to test against. If that fails
check/disable the firewall on the hypervis
Hi Nux
Thanks for the update. I ssh'd into the CPVM and when I run `telnet
HV_Private_IP 5900` I get no route error. But if I do this with my
working existing zone it works fine. So it seems my systemvms cannot
reach the VNC server but when I ping from cpvm to kvm private ip I get a
successf
Oh and make sure to use the "management IP" of the HV as that's what the
CPVM uses.
---
Nux
www.nux.ro [1]
On 2022-11-21 10:13, Nux wrote:
From the CP VM can you reach the VNC consoles of the instances?
ie from the CP VM can you run eg:
telnet Hypervisor-IP 5900
(or whatever is the port
From the CP VM can you reach the VNC consoles of the instances?
ie from the CP VM can you run eg:
telnet Hypervisor-IP 5900
(or whatever is the port, check on the HV)
---
Nux
www.nux.ro [11]
On 2022-11-21 05:44, Granwille Strauss wrote:
Hi Guys
Any advice on this?
On 11/19/22 08:26, Gra
To add to "concern 2", you can use pgbench to compare between bare metal
and VM, it's the benchmarking tool from PostgreSQL DB which should be
very handy in your situation.
---
Nux
www.nux.ro
On 2022-11-21 05:54, Vivek Kumar wrote:
Hello Bryan,
For concern 1-
There are couple of ways to ach
11 matches
Mail list logo
