Thanks everyone for contributing esp Abhishek, Vladi, Lucian, Bobby,
congratulations all for a new release.
Regards.
From: Nux
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2022 10:38:28 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.2.0 (
Well done, Rohit!
---
Nux
www.nux.ro
On 2022-12-16 15:15, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi all,
The vote for Apache CloudStack 4.17.2.0 *passes* with
5 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes.
+1 (PMC / binding)
5 person (Boris, Lucian, Daan, Nicolas, Rohit)
+1 (non binding)
2 person (Abhishek, Vladimir)
0
none
-1
non
# Apache CloudStack LTS Maintenance Release 4.17.2.0
The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the release of
CloudStack 4.17.2.0.
The CloudStack 4.17.2.0 release is a maintenance release as part of its
4.17.x LTS branch and contains more than 20 fixes since
the CloudStack 4.17.1.0 re
Hi all,
The vote for Apache CloudStack 4.17.2.0 *passes* with
5 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes.
+1 (PMC / binding)
5 person (Boris, Lucian, Daan, Nicolas, Rohit)
+1 (non binding)
2 person (Abhishek, Vladimir)
0
none
-1
none
Thanks to everyone participating.
I will now prepare the release announcement
+1
I tested various upgrade paths, main VM operations and workflows.
Greetings,
Vladi
Rohit Yadav wrote:
All,
I've created a 4.17.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SHA:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.17.2.0-RC20221214T0522
Commit: 5
+1 (binding)
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
From: Rohit Yadav
Date: Friday, 16 December 2022 at 09:15
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.2.0 (RC3)
+1 (binding)
Based on upgrade tests and UI/various resource lifecycle tests from RC1-R3, and
based on
+1 (binding)
Based on upgrade tests and UI/various resource lifecycle tests from RC1-R3, and
based on smoketests on 4.17 health check PR.
Perform upgrade from 4.17.1.0 in my homelab KVM env to 4.17.2.0 RC3 and tested
VM/volume/snapshot lifecycles are root admin and normal user in L2, shared and
+1 (binding)
checked packages and basing on Bobby's work
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 10:44 AM Boris Stoyanov <
boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> I’ve did a quick testing around main lifecycle operations of VMs, Volumes,
> Networks, offerings and infra. Looks good to me.
>
> Reg
+1
Tested basic lifecycles using a mbx deployed KVM env.
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: 14 December 2022 10:56
To: dev ; users
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.2.0 (RC3)
All,
I've created a 4.17.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branc
+1 (binding)
Done loads of testing with Advanced zones (with and without SG)
---
Nux
www.nux.ro
On 2022-12-16 09:44, Boris Stoyanov wrote:
+1 (binding)
I’ve did a quick testing around main lifecycle operations of VMs,
Volumes, Networks, offerings and infra. Looks good to me.
Regards,
Bobby.
alright in regards to the example design post it seems i was wrong.
The traffic to cloudstack goes through the PODID interface so things are
fine there.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 10:55 AM jordan j wrote:
> And one more in regards to SSVM.
>
> If a new system vm (console or storage) offering is cr
+1 (binding)
I’ve did a quick testing around main lifecycle operations of VMs, Volumes,
Networks, offerings and infra. Looks good to me.
Regards,
Bobby.
From: Rohit Yadav
Date: Wednesday, 14 December 2022, 7:27
To: dev , users
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.2.0 (RC3)
All,
I've create
And one more in regards to SSVM.
If a new system vm (console or storage) offering is created is there a way
to select which one is chosen for the zone operation?
For example, I created one with a host and storage tags so the SSVM sits on
specific servers, how can i tell the system to use it?
On
13 matches
Mail list logo
