GitHub user midhunpjos added a comment to the discussion: Unable To list
Kubernetes Clusters | Cloudstack 4.18.1
@kiranchavala
Yes, New Deployments are successful as per logs. But unable to list those.
endpoint.url is set to cloudstack IP, http://172.16.1.100:8080/client/api
GitHub link:
ht
GitHub user kiranchavala added a comment to the discussion: Unable To list
Kubernetes Clusters | Cloudstack 4.18.1
@midhunpjos
Did the kubernetes cluster deploy successfully ?
Could you please check the value of global settings "Endpoint url
(endpoint.url) "
GitHub link:
https://github.
Yep done that and virtio_scsi did work. I've now loaded the virtio_blk
drivers to Rocky Linux and it can boot properly.
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 at 18:51, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you update the OS type of template (for new vm) or Stopped vm to "Other
> PV (Virtio-SCSI)" and retry ?
>
> -Wei
>
>
I've created an issue in github.
In the meantime, I've also been able to use Service Offerings and can
confirm that this does offer a workaround. Thanks for the suggestion
Jithin!
Kind regards,
Jeroen Kleijer
On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 2:43 PM Nux wrote:
> So the UI does not cover 100% of the API.
So the UI does not cover 100% of the API.
You will find things that are not covered by the UI, either by
deliberate omission or bug, this happens and it's normal.
The ultimate test is to try it with the API or cmk, if that works then
you know at least you can work around it and most likely you
It'd be great if you opened an issue in github and signal that the UI is
not capable of selecting a cluster.
Unsure whether this would be a bug or an improvement at this point,
maybe the latter.
On 2024-12-09 13:22, Jeroen Kleijer wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks for the responses.
I'll have to look int
Hi nux,
I'll create an issue in github.
My main concern was trying to determine whether I was doing something
stupid in if not, then create an issue :)
Kind regards,
Jeroen Kleijer
On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 2:32 PM Nux wrote:
> It'd be great if you opened an issue in github and signal that the U
Hi all,
Thanks for the responses.
I'll have to look into the tags and service offerings but I've done some
tests using some ansible code and using my user account, I was able to
deploy VMs in both cluster CL01 and CL02 and properly tell it to create the
instance in that cluster. When I tried to sp
If you try to deploy a VM via the API or cmk/cloudmonkey, can the user
select the host or cluster? Trying to determine if it's a UI problem or
more general.
Also, if you put AccountA in DomainA and then dedicated the cluster to
DomainA (generically), does that change anything?
On 2024-12-09 1
Hi Jeroen,
Allowing more APIs to role type ‘user’ may not be useful in listing the
clusters. Have you considered tagging the hosts and creating two compute
offerings that identify the clusters?
-Jithin
From: Jeroen Kleijer
Date: Monday, 9 December 2024 at 4:32 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.o
GitHub user rajujith added a comment to the discussion: setup a cloudsatck on
aws vpc (LEVEL 2 network issue and Primary Storage issue)
@bullblock sharing these articles:
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/building-a-cloud-in-the-cloud-running-apache-cloudstack-on-amazon-ec2-part-1/
https:
Hi,
Can you update the OS type of template (for new vm) or Stopped vm to "Other
PV (Virtio-SCSI)" and retry ?
-Wei
On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 11:42 AM Muhammad Hanis Irfan Mohd Zaid <
hanisirfan.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've posted almost the same question on Rocky Linux forum here:
>
> https://f
Hi all,
We've set up Apache CloudStack (4.19.1.2), users are able to login and we
were able to dedicate resources to their accounts.
We basically created an Account A and dedicated two clusters to it, called
CL01 and CL02.
Our Account A has been assigned the role of "User" since all user accounts
cool.
Rocky uses dracut with -H switch by default ("host only" drivers),
Ubuntu apparently doesn't although I remember at some point there was a
thing about optimizing it as well, perhaps it's just an option.
It can be worked around, but as I said, better to keep it "lean and
mean" and just add
I've posted almost the same question on Rocky Linux forum here:
https://forums.rockylinux.org/t/rocky-linux-9-5-vm-with-virtio-not-booting-up/16773
Just to squeeze the tiny performance improvement, I will use virtio_blk
but still install virtio_scsi driver for compatibility.
Heard that Ubuntu mi
GitHub user alexandremattioli added a comment to the discussion: setup a
cloudsatck on aws vpc (LEVEL 2 network issue and Primary Storage issue)
NFS for primary storage should work just like the secondary storage. How are
you presenting it to CloudStack?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apach
virtio-scsi is pretty good in most cases, even recommended in some
situations, as it's a proper SCSI implementation, so there shouldn't be
major issues there.
virtio-blk is generally faster, but you probably won't see the benefits
in day to day ops unless you're doing hard core stuff.
Problem
GitHub user yummydsky added a comment to the discussion: Baremetal instance
stuck in starting state and timeout after 30 minutes.
I have no idea about what I need to prepare to give it a try. I assume that
there should be a PXE server inside if I choose the network offering that
offers the fo
GitHub user yummydsky edited a comment on the discussion: Baremetal instance
stuck in starting state and timeout after 30 minutes.
@rajujith
I have no idea about what I need to prepare to give it a try. I assume that
there should be a PXE server inside if I choose the network offering that
o
19 matches
Mail list logo
