Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.19.2.0

Hi Mauro, There is a bug in listing the tagged network offerings [1]. Still, you should be able to create the network on the new physical networks with API/CMK. create network physicalnetworkid=5e453b97-9f7f-4319-9923-d2e96aff21cf name=guestOnNewPhysicalNet6 displaytext=guestOnNewPhysicalNet6

Experience with OpenVSwitch?

Hey Guys, Does anyone have any experience using OpenVSwitch with Cloudstack? Is it actively maintained? We are using native bridges now with KVM. Have some scenarios where we need to accelerate the networking in our cloud. We were thinking to pass GuestVM traffic to the NIC or vNIC (SR IOV) ,

Re: upgrade from 4.19 to 4.20

It might be helpful to run those operations with the log level set to DEBUG, could give us more insights. That said, I upgraded from 4.19 to 4.20 and I too hit issues, including the new DB thing in 4.20 and the new log4j2 - make sure log4j2.xml is symlink to log4j-cloud.xml in /etc/cloudstack/

Re: Traffic on multiple network interfaces.

Hi, I believe what you are seeing is similar to this issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/10316. Regards, Pearl From: Mercado Sent: February 3, 2025 4:55 PM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Traffic on multiple network interfaces. I

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.19.2.0

Hi Wei, thanks for you answer. About this issue, we do some tests and we think it is a bug. I will give you more details about the tests: We have CloudStack 4.19.1 KVM cluster CS has two physical network interfaces configured in CloudStack as follows:  * *Physical Network 1 (cloudbr0)*: Hand

Traffic on multiple network interfaces.

I have a CloudStack 4.19.1 KVM cluster. I have two physical network interfaces configured in CloudStack as follows: * *Physical Network 1 (cloudbr0)*: Handles all general CloudStack traffic (VMs, Guest, Management, Public). This network has no tag. * *Physical Network 2 (cloudbr1)*: Handles

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.19.2.0

Hello Daan, all I got a little bit confused with the fact that the RC for the 4.19.2.0 release was opened for voting and, in the meantime, we were still working and merging bug fixes PRs targeting the 4.19 branch. This is not the usual procedure we adopt for the release process. I believe that it

RE: upgrade from 4.19 to 4.20

I did but it didn't change the behaviour of the agent. I tried the procedure to re-add the host (found it in the mailing list for an old version): 1. Copied the contents of the agent.properties file from another KVM host. 2. Removed the values in the fields like: guid and keystore.passphrase 3. Se

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.19.2.0

Hi Mauro, After some discussions, we tend to consider that it is not a bug. If you have multiple physical networks with Guest traffic, it is recommended to keep the default physical network untagged. Kind regards, Wei On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 2:46 PM Mauro Ferraro - G2K Hosting < mferr...@g2kho

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.19.2.0

Hi, how are you?. We download de RC to test the https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9673 but we noted that is not available yet. So, we want to wait this issue to test this specific and complex situation. Regards, El 3/2/2025 a las 06:26, Daan Hoogland escribió: LS, I've had no r

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.21.0

this seems like a reasonable schedule @Suresh Anaparti , thanks for taking this on. You have my support. On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 2:19 PM Suresh Kumar Anaparti < sureshanapa...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > I want to propose and put myself forward as the release manager for 4.21.0 > if there ar

[PROPOSE] RM for 4.21.0

Hi All, I want to propose and put myself forward as the release manager for 4.21.0 if there are no objections. I've previously RM'd 4.16.1.0 & 4.19.1.0 releases, and co-RM'd some releases before that. I hope that experiences will help me here, for a successful release. I think, for 4.21.0, we can

Re: [D] Can't upload Lets Encrypt certificate [cloudstack]

GitHub user SviridoffA closed the discussion with a comment: Can't upload Lets Encrypt certificate Thanks for sharing. I decided not to figure out which parameter was needed since everything worked with a different certificate format. But I’m sure this is very useful information for the futur

Re: [D] Can't upload Lets Encrypt certificate [cloudstack]

GitHub user kapsch-gtanya closed the discussion with a comment: Can't upload Lets Encrypt certificate This is due to newer version of certbot use ECDSA algorithms. You can add the parameter `--key-type rsa` in your certbot command. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussion

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.19.2.0

LS, I've had no reactions. I can say "no news is good news" or be a pessimist. Did anybody at all have a look yet? The 72 hours are way gone, and we had a weekend as well. On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 10:52 AM Daan Hoogland wrote: > LS, > I uploaded convenience packages to > https://download.cloudst