Re: [D] Unable to delete zone , using 4.19.1. [cloudstack]

GitHub user jack99trade added a comment to the discussion: Unable to delete zone , using 4.19.1. Hi @rajujith , yes all the volumes were deleted then both primary and secondary storage. how do i check the database? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10958#discu

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0 RC2

+1 (binding) Tested with Ubuntu 22 on KVM hypervisor. Performed basic VM lifecycle operations. CKS deployment Template registration. Looks good. Regards, Pearl From: Wei ZHOU Sent: June 5, 2025 3:44 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev Subject: Re:

Re: [D] Unable to delete zone , using 4.19.1. [cloudstack]

GitHub user rajujith added a comment to the discussion: Unable to delete zone , using 4.19.1. @jack99trade, it shouldn't have allowed you to delete the primary storage when there are active volumes present. Ideally, the sequence of operation will be: 1. Delete volumes. 2. Delete Primary S

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0 RC2

+1 (binding) Tested on Ubuntu 24 some vm/network lifecycles run smoke tests, etc No major issues found -Wei On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 9:20 AM Daan Hoogland wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a new RC for the 4.19.3.0 release, with the following > artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Com

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.20.1.0 RC3

+1 (binding) Tested on debian 12 some vm/network lifecycles run smoke tests, etc No major issues found -Wei On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 11:31 AM Pearl Dsilva wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a new RC for the 4.20.1.0 release, with the following > artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Comm

Re: [D] Unable to delete zone , using 4.19.1. [cloudstack]

GitHub user jack99trade added a comment to the discussion: Unable to delete zone , using 4.19.1. This is the error i see in logs :- ERROR [c.c.a.ApiServer] (qtp940584193-382:ctx-a26f0c3b ctx-e259a45e) (logid:6c5d48b7) unhandled exception executing api command: [Ljava.lang.String;@65eecab6

Re: [D] Unable to delete zone , using 4.19.1. [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Unable to delete zone , using 4.19.1. hm, any errors or stacktraces in the logs? GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10958#discussioncomment-13371289 This is an automatically sent email for users@clou

Re: [D] Unable to delete zone , using 4.19.1. [cloudstack]

GitHub user jack99trade added a comment to the discussion: Unable to delete zone , using 4.19.1. Yes , destroyed systemvms , and also both primary and secondary storages are deleted. Zone is in disabled state . but fails to delete. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/disc

Re: [D] Unable to delete zone , using 4.19.1. [cloudstack]

GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: Unable to delete zone , using 4.19.1. I think you must disable the zone and destroy the SVMs (ssvm/cpvm). Then you can destroy the storage for the zone and the zone itself. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussi

Re: [D] VXLAN: Loss of Connectivity Between Two VMs After Idle Time on KVM Hosts – CloudStack 4.20 [cloudstack]

GitHub user lexmora added a comment to the discussion: VXLAN: Loss of Connectivity Between Two VMs After Idle Time on KVM Hosts – CloudStack 4.20 Hello, yes the output in the host is 24: vxlan7209: mtu 8950 qdisc noqueue master brvx-7209 state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000

Monitoring and managing Cloud Usages feature

Hi everyone, In May at the CSEUG in Vienna, we introduced the idea of a Resource Consumption and Green Ops dashboard, which aims to provide insightful metrics and analytics for CloudStack users. This feature is designed to help admins and users monitor and optimize resource usage, infrastructur

Re: [D] Host based routing - EVPN-VXLAN to the host - Single VXLAN Device (SVD) [cloudstack]

GitHub user joolli added a comment to the discussion: Host based routing - EVPN-VXLAN to the host - Single VXLAN Device (SVD) @wido It doesn't require libvirt to have knowledge of the VLANS. Just the bridge name, like with traditional mode. Feel free to complain about my syntax. It probably ha

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.20.1.0 RC3

+1 (binding) Upgrade from 4.19.3.0 (RC2) Manually tested some basic VM operations, and the StorPool tests were successful Best regards, Slavka On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 5:43 AM Abhisar Sinha wrote: > +1 > > Tested VM/Volume workflows (kvm + ol8), Shared filesystem lifecycle, Nas > backup and reco

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.19.3.0 RC2

+1 (binding) Some manual tests with KVM as a hypervisor. The StorPool tests are executed successfully Best regards, Slavka On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 5:57 PM Vladimir Petrov < vladimir.pet...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > +1 > > Tested upgrades from 4.19.2 with VMware/KVM hypervisors, basic VM/network >

Re: [D] can domain admin create service offerings with storag or host tags? [cloudstack]

GitHub user PPisz added a comment to the discussion: can domain admin create service offerings with storag or host tags? Thanks for the clarification, indeed root admin can complete tags :-) GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10952#discussioncomment-13368526 T

Re: [D] can domain admin create service offerings with storag or host tags? [cloudstack]

GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: can domain admin create service offerings with storag or host tags? > Hi @PPisz, after a quick check on CloudStack RC3 4.20.1.0, the domain admin > doesn't see the hosts/primary storage, only the zones. That's why the option > to se

Re: [D] can domain admin create service offerings with storag or host tags? [cloudstack]

GitHub user slavkap added a comment to the discussion: can domain admin create service offerings with storag or host tags? Hi @PPisz, after a quick check on CloudStack RC3 4.20.1.0, the domain admin doesn't see the hosts/primary storage, only the zones. That's why the option to set tags is no

Re: [D] Host based routing - EVPN-VXLAN to the host - Single VXLAN Device (SVD) [cloudstack]

GitHub user wido added a comment to the discussion: Host based routing - EVPN-VXLAN to the host - Single VXLAN Device (SVD) I don't have a test env now, but this looks good. But it does require that Libvirt has knowledge of the VLANs, correct? I can "complain" about a few syntax things, but o

Free registration for Committers & PMC Members - CloudStack Collaboration Conference

Hi everyone, I'd like to share that CloudStack Committers/PMC members are eligible for free registration for the CloudStack Collaboration Conference, taking place on 19-21 November in Milan. Please note that all tickets usin

Re: [D] Add an IPv6 Zone (with private IPv4 addresses) [cloudstack]

GitHub user MejdiB closed a discussion: Add an IPv6 Zone (with private IPv4 addresses) I am currently trying to add another zone which works witch public available IPv6 addresses (reachable from the existing zone) with the following conditions: - There is a wireguard connection between default