GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: OpenWRT as virtual
router?
Sounds like a good idea with the caveat that the virtual router provides a host
of functionalities that are not particular to routers (user data and password
server spring to mind, but there are bound to be
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: createAccount fails
with "unable to verify user credentials and/or request signature"
If you can find related issues, please @Rubueno . If no particular issues have
been discovered this will require studying logs from the last success
*IN ENGLISH*
Hello,
I recently installed CloudStack on bare metal and am using it with
vSphere.
I configured the first zone, pod, cluster, networks, primary storage,
and secondary storage.
I used a TrueNAS server to provide the Secondary Storage NFS pool.
Everything seemed to go well. My
GitHub user joolli edited a discussion: OpenWRT as virtual router?
Hi,
I'm wondering whether someone has looked into using OpenWRT as virtual router?
It seems like it might be a good candidate. The design has gone through
excruciating steps to make it resource sparse, especially regarding memo
GitHub user joolli created a discussion: OpenWRT as virtual router?
Hi,
I'm wondering whether someone has looked into using OpenWRT as virtual router?
It seems like it might be a good candidate. The design has gone through
excruciating steps to make it resource sparse, especially regarding mem
Hi All,
I have created a 4.21.0.0 release (RC1), with the following artifacts up
for testing and a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SHA:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.21.0.0-RC20250805T1545
Commit: b910b41d0683253bb403c3827bdf74a72746422a
Source release (checksums and signatures are ava
GitHub user Rubueno edited a comment on the discussion: createAccount fails
with "unable to verify user credentials and/or request signature"
I was able to reproduce the issue with cmk a few months ago, but I do not have
the logfiles anymore. If I remember correctly, only the `createAccount` c
GitHub user Rubueno edited a comment on the discussion: createAccount fails
with "unable to verify user credentials and/or request signature"
I was able to reproduce the issue with cmk a few months ago, but I do not have
the logfiles anymore. If I remember correctly, only the `createAccount` c
GitHub user Rubueno edited a comment on the discussion: createAccount fails
with "unable to verify user credentials and/or request signature"
I was able to reproduce the issue with cmk a few months ago, but I do not have
the logfiles anymore. If I remember correctly, only the `createAccount` c
GitHub user Rubueno added a comment to the discussion: createAccount fails with
"unable to verify user credentials and/or request signature"
I was able to reproduce the issue with cmk a few months ago, but I do not have
the logfiles anymore. If I remember correctly, only the `createAccount` ca
GitHub user kiranchavala added a comment to the discussion: createAccount fails
with "unable to verify user credentials and/or request signature"
@Rubueno
Can you try with the Cloud Monkey tool, if it solves your use case and problem
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey
GitHu
Hi Daan
I have already realized the meaning of 46 / 46. I was unable to deploy new
instances. The reason was that the resource allocation thresholds for the
cluster were exceeded but I thought the max number of instances limit was
reached. I have already fixed the problem by adjusting thresholds.
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: createAccount fails
with "unable to verify user credentials and/or request signature"
@Rubueno , I converted this to a Q&A discussion. Not that I do not take it
seriously, but as of yet it is too vague to pinpoint a bug, so let’s
inv
GitHub user Rubueno created a discussion: createAccount fails with "unable to
verify user credentials and/or request signature"
### problem
I don't know what other category to sort this under, so I selected "Bug". I
just need some help figuring out where the issue lies. Our Development team
Hey Fernando,
No reactions either means no one is interested in the question, or the
more optimistic view is that no one else is using it. I don't but the
theory is that read-only users can see/list anything in their domain
and in any domain below theirs, including VMs, networks. and capacity
data.
Nilantha,
I don't think there is. As it is a lab env, you may try to hack it in
the DB but don't try this at home.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 5:57 PM nilantha liyanage
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> I have installed cloudstack in a lab environment and have configured an
> advanced zone with security groups,
If you use passwords as opposed to certificates, you need to update
the password on the hosts and in cloudstack. The latter can be done in
the UI or with the updateHostPassword API
(https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.20/apis/updateHostPassword.html)
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 11:26 AM Sanjay
Hi Fernando,
I had the same understanding as you but in practice the role is too restricted.
In the end, I adjusted the role with the necessary rights...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Daan Hoogland
Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. August 2025 10:39
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Is
Fairborz,
Can you be more precise about what you are trying to do to resolve
your problem. I understand the issue but not what setting you have
increased and by what interface. I am looking at a newer version and I
cannot find such a setting in the code. The 46 / 46 just means that
the host has 46
Marty,
the default page is not showing anything, see
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9993 for a discussion on
the subject.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 7:18 AM Marty Godsey wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The usage data on the GUI does not show me any details. It shows the server
> as green and con
GitHub user DaanHoogland closed the discussion with a comment: Unable to
provision keys
ok, so maybe a smal reformulation of the doc text is in order?
```
uncomment the line `LIBVIRTD_ARGS="—listen”` if it is there. If not, make sure
to add it.
```
?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cl
GitHub user PPisz closed a discussion: vpn - Peer requested tunnel 1 twice,
ignoring second one
I'm having trouble with VPN tunnels. Generally, once configured, they work
correctly. However, after connecting and disconnecting the tunnel several
times, no clients are accepted. The following in
GitHub user PPisz added a comment to the discussion: vpn - Peer requested
tunnel 1 twice, ignoring second one
The cause was incorrect routing on the VR. The primary public IP was from one
addressing, and the IP on which the SNAT was located was from a different
addressing (and the default gw
23 matches
Mail list logo
