Hi Jim,
Typically you would run the proxy from your local machine with a web
browser.
And then open the URL specified on your browser.
Ed
On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 09:05, James Steele wrote:
> Hi all, we have set up the Kubernetes service inside CloudStack as per:
>
>
> http://docs.cloudstack.ap
Hi,
I have an existing KVM cluster and am looking to enable local storage for
certain workloads.
Is it safe to enable this on an existing production cluster and am I
correct in assuming that
/var/lib/libvirt/images/ will be the path unless defined within
agent.properties?
Currently my agent.prop
x27; (without dot) be resolved in the vm ?
>
> I confirm that the password server listens only on the VIP, it should not
> be a problem.
> in my testing with 4.16.0.0-rc2, 'data-server' and 'data-server.' can be
> both resolved as VIP.
>
> -Wei
>
> On
opinion. The password server and userdata server
> listen on both guest ip and vip.
>
> As I commented on the link in previous reply, if cloud-init does not work
> in your vm template, it might be caused by systemd-resolved.
>
> -Wei
>
>
> On Wednesday, 3 November 2021, Edw
3 Nov 2021 at 20:15, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi Edward,
>
> You may face an issue which has recently been fixed in cloud-init .
> Please refer to https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init/pull/1004
>
> -Wei
>
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 12:48, Edward St Pierre
> wrote:
>
>
on: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;data-server. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
data-server.0 IN A 10.1.1.154
;; Query time: 1 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Wed Nov 03 11:58:43 UTC 2021
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 56
On Wed, 3
Hi Guys,
Just a really quick question.
Should 'data-server.' resolve to the virtual router or the guest?
Basically the cloud-init datasource for Cloudstack that comes with CentOS
Stream seems to use this as the address for the VR.
Just looking to see if this is a VR bug or a bug with this modul
> -Original Message-----
> From: Edward St Pierre
> Sent: 26 July 2021 16:29
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Cloudstack GPU
>
> Hi,
>
> I am looking into implementing vGPU with KVM after reading this article:
>
> https://lab.piszki.pl/cloudstack-kvm-and-
Hi,
I am looking into implementing vGPU with KVM after reading this article:
https://lab.piszki.pl/cloudstack-kvm-and-running-vm-with-vgpu/
And checking out specific notes here:
https://docs.nvidia.com/grid/latest/grid-vgpu-release-notes-generic-linux-kvm/index.html
Ed
On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 at
Hi,
You need to have a spare IP address for static NAT, and when you click on
the IP address there is a little icon on the top right to enable static
nat. (next to the trash can)
Ed
On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 at 08:03, Halloesnith wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am using cloudstack 4.15.1 with KVM. I
> Did you upgrade and cloudstack agents? I guess that `cloud-api` jar in
> `/usr/share/cloudstack-agent/lib` is with an older version that does not
> have the method `isPrivateGateway`
>
> Best regards,
> Slavka
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 10:02 PM Edward St Pierre <
>
Hello,
Any help or pointers would be greatly appreciated.
After upgrading CS Virtual routers to 4.15.1 The VM does actually get
built and powers on (visible via console proxy), and then is suddenly
powered off. and this error is displayed in the interface
'(r-340-VM) Resource [Host:10] is unrea
unrelated.
Ed
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at 16:07, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi Edward,
>
> Is that same as what I reported at
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5138 ?
> removing /var/lock/conntrackd.lock solves the problem.
>
> -Wei
>
>
>
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2021 at
Hi Guys,
Is there a problem with the new system template? it appears that there is a
stale lock file for conntrackd, this is from a newly deployed virtual
router that was not coming up properly:
systemvm-kvm-4.15.1
Checksum:
5cd235522d1d9cc9c5c80824fdca80004956b5aee533e283334d8a6b6caa2aa3fd939650
Hi Andy,
Have you prepared the system VM template?
Ed
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 at 11:32, Andy Nguyen wrote:
> Short version: identical nfs export for primary and secondary. Primary
> works fine, secondary mounts but doesn't write.
>
> Long version:
> I asked this on reddit
> https://www.reddit.com/
Hi Guys,
I have already logged this as a big under reference: 4797
Ed
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 06:37, Suresh Anaparti
wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> Can you check if the storage garbage collector is enabled or not in your
> env (specified using the global setting 'storage.cleanup.enabled'). If it
> is
Hi,
Did you create the bridge interfaces on the hypervisor?
com.cloud.exception.InternalErrorException: Failed to create vnet 200: ls:
cannot access '/sys/class/net//brif/': No such file or directoryCommand
On Fri, 21 May 2021 at 10:29, Serge Byishimo
wrote:
> Centos 8
> Cloudstack 4.15
>
>
we can have
> more developers looking at and keeping track of it.
> To open an issue you can go to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues
> .
>
> Regards,
> Gabriel.
>
> Em sex., 5 de mar. de 2021 às 13:00, Edward St Pierre <
> edward.stpie...@gmail.com> escreveu
#x27;secondary storage "garbage" should be cleaned up'?
Many thanks for your help.
Ed
On Fri, 5 Mar 2021 at 15:12, Gabriel Bräscher wrote:
> Before seeing the last reply I had just tested on CloudStack 4.15 + Ceph +
> KVM, and it worked fine; however, I did the test with one snapshot of the
> volume.
> Maybe the scheduled/incremental snapshotting adds a different variable to
>
quot;HOURLY","state":"BackedUp","physicalsize":"16888233984","zoneid":"9000b853-f5e0-4451-ad49-64dfae95db84","revertable":"true","ostypeid":"2cd2aa56-ee6a-11e9-8f54-0050569d3815","o
Hi All,
I Wonder if someone could help me.
Currently using ceph for primary storage and have
'snapshot.backup.to.secondary' enabled.
Since upgrading to 4.15 the volume snapshots do not seem to be getting
deleted from the secondary storage. Could this be a bug?
Also when logged in as the main a
o false.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nicolas Vazquez
>
> ________
> From: Edward St Pierre
> Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 11:25 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Health Checks for redundant VR or a VPC Router
>
> Hi,
>
> I
Hi,
I have recently updated to version 4.15 from 4.13 and it looks great,
however I seem to have hit a problem with all the alerts filling up with
the following error:
Health checks failed: 1 failing checks on router
342ebf56-4128-4350-967f-cea40c26b080
For pretty most of my redundant VR or VPC
23 matches
Mail list logo
