e being many downsides (other than time spent
implementing it).
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Nux! wrote:
>> This is where i was going with this as well. Keep over-provisioning
>> level under 1 and cut of @ 85%.
>>
>>> - B) Add a n
t;1"
(e.g., .85). This would effectively act as a "cap" on hypervisor
resources.
- B) Add a new setting for a "host" level "cut off threshold" in
addition to the existing "cluster" level threshold.
Thoughts?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Ho
ng account/domain metadata as
well, but I haven't seen a production implementation of that
documented anywhere.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Timothy Lothering
wrote:
> What if the DB is being shared?
>
> Regards,
>
> -Orig
Use 'cloud-init' for setting up hostname/users/disk resizing/anything
else. It's included in the repos for most distros, supports
CloudStack, and has a Windows service:
https://cloudinit.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Fri, Apr 24,
there another way to set up a
site-to-site VPN using the existing network?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
Our current deployment is KVM with Ceph RBD primary storage. We have
rbd_cache enabled, and use "cache=none" in Qemu by default.
I've been running some tests to try to figure out why our write speeds
with FreeBSD are significantly lower than Linux. I was testing both
RBD and local SSD storage, w
t being able to deploy from it.
There should be some function added to update a template or templates
to become cross zone, other than manually editing the database and
restarting the management server.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Logan Barfield wro
stering a template via a URL, which
isn't any help here.
Is there a reason for this weirdness?
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
g a
single node go down (hence our interest in HA), but having a whole
datacenter's worth of customer VMs rebooting at once would be a nightmare.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
> Regions are designed to be completely separat
is up and 1 is down.
- Site 3: Thinks all sites are up.
In the above case the least harmful thing would be to push site 3 to the
other two, but since all three sites have different data it may just hang
instead.
This is going to drive me nuts. :D
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Wed,
n right now, short of
> setting up a completely separate CS instances per DC.
>
> Hope this helps a little.
>
> - Si
>
>
> From: Logan Barfield
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 1:45 PM
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
&g
We are currently running a single location CloudStack deployment:
- 1 Hardware firewall
- 1 Mangement/Database Server
- 1 NFS staging store (for S3 secondary storage)
- Ceph RBD for primary storage
- 4 Hypervisors
- 1 Zone/Pod/Cluster
We are looking to expand our deployment to other datacenters, a
Thanks for the confirmation. I probably won't get around to actually
messing with it until January, so maybe someone else will chime in for more
verification.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Marcus wrote:
>
> My guess is that you&
During initial deployment we went with a simpler network design by letting
secondary storage traffic run over the management network. We would like
to offload secondary storage to a separate network, and are trying to
figure out the best method of doing so.
Based on the recommendations in the doc
I am attempting to increase the size of our NFS staging store because we
have several customers that want to create snapshots of 1TB+ disks.
Is it possible to simply add a second staging store to a zone to increase
the capacity? Or would I need to add a larger staging store, then remove
the old o
NETWORK_STATS IPtables entries on
the VR, so I would think it could pull the traffic for just the public
interface. Even better would be to pull the traffic for each public IP,
but that would be a bit more difficult I assume.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
ompletion
would be great.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Logan Barfield
wrote:
> Hi Rohit,
>
> The only thing I can think of is offering descriptions for UUIDs for
> more of the arguments when using tab completion (like it does not wi
"publicipid" UUID to an IP address,
for example:
create remoteaccessvpn publicipid=
abcdefg-123456-abcde... 100.100.100.100
hijklmno-789011-hijklm... 100.100.100.101
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
&
18 matches
Mail list logo
