Re: listUsageRecords fails after deleting an account

2013-10-11 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
()); 3262                         usageRecResponse.setUsageId( (sg!=null)? sg.getUuid(): missing_security_group_ + usageRecord.getUsageId().toString() ); 3263                 } Regards, Niki On Thursday, October 10, 2013 8:01 PM, Nikolay Kabadjov niki...@yahoo.com wrote: Nope! no stack trace

Re: createSecurityGroup in a project, in a subdomain leads to Unable to find project by id=15

2013-10-10 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
? Can you send us the corresponding management server log ? thanks -sebastien On Sep 26, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Nikolay Kabadjov niki...@yahoo.com wrote: Some more information about the issue: The API command createSecurityGroup with projectid succeeds every third or forth time. All the other

Re: mem.overprovisioning.facto and KVM

2013-10-10 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
hypervisor to allocate reserved memory for VM. @Marcus, could you comment on this: is mem over provisioning supposed to work with KVM ? On 25-Sep-2013, at 11:11 AM, Nikolay Kabadjov niki...@yahoo.com wrote: Yes Kirk, I did From: Kirk Jantzer

listUsageRecords fails after deleting an account

2013-10-10 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
I've got the following response with no further explanation and no exceptions in the management-server.log related to the issue {     listusagerecordsresponse: {         errorcode: 530,         cserrorcode:     } } Any idea?  How could I overcome this peculiar situation?  Thanks, Niki

Re: listUsageRecords fails after deleting an account

2013-10-10 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
The only meaningfull line in the log is:  2013-10-10 18:29:06,063 ERROR [cloud.api.ApiServer] (ApiServer-3:null) unhandled exception executing api command: listUsageRecords java.lang.NullPointerException On Thursday, October 10, 2013 6:46 PM, Nikolay Kabadjov niki...@yahoo.com wrote: I've

createSecurityGroup in a project, in a subdomain leads to Unable to find project by id=15

2013-09-26 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
Hi falks,  Strange!. I am logged in as a domain admin of domain ROOT/XYZ. When I try to create a security group in a project which resides in a ROOT/XYZ I've got the folloing exception:  {     createsecuritygroupresponse: {         errorcode: 431,         cserrorcode: 4350,         errortext:

Re: InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM

2013-09-25 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
In addition I always get the the same exception when the allocated mem comes to about 82 or 83 % regardless of the service offering I am using to deploy a VM, even with the smallest one.  Are there any rules or something?  From: Nikolay Kabadjov niki

Re: Storage pool not found: no storage pool with matching uuid �s8�����7�\u000e�

2013-09-25 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
It seems the issue has disappeared after harmonizing all kvm storage pool definitions.  Thanks! From: Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com To: Nikolay Kabadjov niki...@yahoo.com; users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Tuesday

Re: Storage pool not found: no storage pool with matching uuid �s8�����7�\u000e�

2013-09-24 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
    no And in addition, is this Autostart=no good enough?  Thanks and Best Regards, Niki From: Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org; Nikolay Kabadjov niki...@yahoo.com Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 11:46 AM

Re: InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM

2013-09-24 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
I am trying to deploy a VM with 34 GB RAM but it is still far from the limit.  MemoryAllocated: 1.20 TB / 1.48 TB81% From: Richard Chatterton richard.chatter...@contegix.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Nikolay Kabadjov niki...@yahoo.com Sent: Friday

mem.overprovisioning.facto and KVM

2013-09-24 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
Hi all,  I've noticed that increasing mem.overprovisioning.factor doesn't take effect?  I mean I still see in the dashboard the exact amount of memory I have multiplying the memory of all the hosts.  It's CS 4.1.1 with one zone, one pod, one cluster, 6 KVM hosts  Any idea?  Thanks  Niki

Storage pool not found: no storage pool with matching uuid �s8�����7�\u000e�

2013-09-23 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
Hi all,  we are using CloudStack 4.1.1 against KVM hypervisors and from time to time we are getting the following strange exception, hence we got failure in VM deployment:  2013-09-23 09:12:25,793 DEBUG [cloud.template.TemplateManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-150:job-1730) Template 223 has already

Re: Usage Server is running but DB is empty

2013-09-20 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
Hello Steven,  in our case it was a matter of missing DB credentials set in the config file:  db.cloud.username= db.cloud.password= Regards, Niki From: Steven Liang stevenliang2...@gmail.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; Nikolay Kabadjov niki...@yahoo.com

Re: Usage Server is running but DB is empty

2013-09-20 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
From: Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee To: users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org; Nikolay Kabadjov niki...@yahoo.com Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 8:53 AM Subject: RE: Usage Server is running but DB is empty The same issue for me. Usage

InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM

2013-09-20 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
Hello,  I am not able to deploy a VM any more with the following Exception:  2013-09-20 16:14:58,252 INFO  [user.vm.DeployVMCmd] (Job-Executor-8:job-1501) com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|test114]Scope=interface

Usage Server is running but DB is empty

2013-09-19 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
Hello,  we've built a deb package for the usage server  cloudstack-usage_4.1.1-0.0.snapshot_all.deb,  installed it and started the cloudstack-usage service.  But it seems it is not working, I mean there are no logs in  /var/log/cloudstack/usage, all the tables in cloud_usage are empty.b  Any

Re: Usage Server is running but DB is empty

2013-09-19 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
Thanks Stanislav! The issue is solved.  It was a matter of missing DB properties configuration.  Regards, Niki From: Stanislav Petrov devilfighter1...@gmail.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Nikolay Kabadjov niki...@yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, September

errortext: Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|test53]

2013-09-19 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
Hello,  when I tried to deploy 100 VM at once I've got only 14 of them successfully deployed.  For the jobs of the rest I've got the folloing error code:  { queryasyncjobresultresponse: { accountid: 20427bfa-1971-11e3-b487-005056a04c9e, userid: 2043cdd5-1971-11e3-b487-005056a04c9e, cmd:

Re: Storage Allocated: 0.00 KB / 0.00 KB, hence unable to start a VM

2013-08-29 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
Yes Nitin,  both Xen hosts (in a pool) were up and running all the time.  Regards, Niki From: Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org; Nikolay Kabadjov niki...@yahoo.com; d...@cloudstack.apache.org d

Re: Storage Allocated: 0.00 KB / 0.00 KB, hence unable to start a VM

2013-08-29 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
Hi,  the issue is resolved! The root cause was that one of the XEN Servers has run out of disk sapce and CS was not able to connect to it.  Regards, Niki From: Nikolay Kabadjov niki...@yahoo.com To: users@cloudstack.apache.org users@cloudstack.apache.org; d

Storage Allocated: 0.00 KB / 0.00 KB, hence unable to start a VM

2013-08-28 Thread Nikolay Kabadjov
Hello everybody,  While using CloudStack 3.0.6, from time to time we a gettin the folloiwing issue: the dashboard shows Storage Allocated: 0.00 KB / 0.00 KB and no VM can be started. the issue dissapeared all of a sudden few hours later.  Any idea?  Thanks and Best Regards, Niki