Re: VM Snapshot not removed from primary SR

2018-10-14 Thread Sami Rajala (FAPPS)
) (logid:3bb6a1d2) Invocation exception, caused by: com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: BackupSnapshot Failed due to Exception in backupsnapshot stage due to The uuid you supplied was invalid. 10.10.2018 21.44, "Sami Rajala (FAPPS)" : >Hi, > > >has job ²snapshot rem

Re: VM Snapshot not removed from primary SR

2018-10-10 Thread Sami Rajala (FAPPS)
8/job-29199 ctx-1f9eb415) (logid:f2cbdadb) We are returning the default host to execute commands because the command is not of Copy type. 2018-10-10 20:01:37,702 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (Work-Job-Executor-36:ctx-138e84ea job-29198/job-29199 ctx-1f9eb415) (logid:f2cbdadb) Seq 161-629659522901785142: Sen

Re: VM Snapshot not removed from primary SR

2018-10-10 Thread Sami Rajala (FAPPS)
eated and copied to secondary ) >> >> I have still delete primary snapshot by manual + give a new value for >> ”secondary_storege” before they reach limit. >> >> has anyone got this kind of issue? any fix >> >> BR >> -sami >> >> >> >

Re: VM Snapshot not removed from primary SR

2018-09-14 Thread Sami Rajala (FAPPS)
anyone any advice? BR -sami 13.9.2018 7.56, "Sami Rajala (FAPPS)" : >Hello > >I have had weird issue since I updated CS from 4.9 to 4.10. >CS does not delete/remove temporary snapshot from primary SR and I have >had to removed it by manual time to time, before 30 sn

VM Snapshot not removed from primary SR

2018-09-12 Thread Sami Rajala (FAPPS)
Hello I have had weird issue since I updated CS from 4.9 to 4.10. CS does not delete/remove temporary snapshot from primary SR and I have had to removed it by manual time to time, before 30 snapshot limit has reached. + doesn¹t CS not update secondary_storege count on snapshot_count table It work

Re: System VM Issues 4.11?

2018-02-16 Thread Sami Rajala (FAPPS)
Hi Paul, yes, I have I also rollback to 4.10, so no more details from logs available. But I have planned to try more on next week. BR -sami 16.2.2018 10.45, "Paul Angus" : >Sami, > >Have you run the update step which is mentioned here? >http://markmail.org/message/f42kqr3mx4r4hgih > >I don't K