e awaiting headers)
Regards,
Jordan
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 12:19 PM jordan j wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I do have a case of a stuck host in disconnected state that cannot be
> connect or removed (disable host + force remove) similar to this issue
> https://github.com/apac
Hello everyone,
I do have a case of a stuck host in disconnected state that cannot be
connect or removed (disable host + force remove) similar to this issue
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/9250
Environment is 4.19.1.0 + XCPNG host.
Is there a good solution for this?
I see no error
possible for other arguments to fail as well. Can someone
verify this? here is an example command:
cmk add host zoneid= podid= clustername=my-cluster
hypervisor=KVM url=http:// username=root hosttags=test-tag
allocationstate=enabled
Regards,
Jordan
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 9:13 AM jordan j
I think I figured it out.
The log was referring to host primary storage tags and not volume tags.
Best regards,
Jordan
On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 1:21 PM jordan j wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Setup is 4.19.1.0 with compute offerings that have both host and storage
> tags, and disk of
Dear all,
Setup is 4.19.1.0 with compute offerings that have both host and storage
tags, and disk offerings with storage tags.
We want to change the disk offerings tags to implement a new schema.
When tried from UI error 500 appears. From the logs I see a message that
lists all currently active vo
Alexandru Stan
wrote:
> Hi Jordan,
>
> The sudo line in the documentation is not correct (maybe a format issue?),
> I always got errors when doing sudo su with the created user. This works,
> however:
>
> sudo: ["ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD:ALL"]
>
>
>
>
> -
Hello Granwille,
Disable the network from system_info and try again.
I have found that cloud-init has issues with handling networking on some
os-es and because of that it does not start properly.
Unfortunately I have not spent time on research of "Why".
echo "system_info:
default_user:
name
Hello Murilo,
If I understand correctly you want to restrict capacity from domain limits
instead of account limits?
As far as I know cloudstack uses the limit that is more limiting, so
account limits are set to unlimited you can do restriction just from domain
limits settings.
Regards,
Jordan
On
lib/libvirt/images",
> > "podid": "0af34b96-e88d-440e-a6bd-c4e8aab4aa4a",
> > "podname": "Pod-A",
> > "provider": "DefaultPrimary",
> > "scope": "HOST",
> > "
Hello everyone,
The docs claim that this can be done from UI and from manually modifying
the agent on the KVM host but I wonder if it can be done from CLI? Here is
my experience so far (CS 4.19.1.0, one pod with mixed XCP and KVM clusters).
- Manually modifying the agent: It works
- From Primary
I.
>
> For example, see this:
> https://github.com/rohityadavcloud/c8k.in/blob/main/install.sh#L289
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: jordan j
> Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 09:18
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>
n Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 6:38 AM jordan j wrote:
> Hello Rohit,
>
> Yes, the GUI clearly shows that but I was exploring doing it from the
> command line with Cloudmonkey.
>
> Rodrigo, I did some tests today and it works. However the command reports
> an error state even though t
on the kvm host.
>
> Regards.
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
> ________
> From: jordan j
> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2024 8:42:46 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Join KVM host from CLI using only user and certificate
>
> Thank y
Hello Marty,
Indeed we create the vms on CS from ISO and then convert. So far I have not
found another way.
I know there is a cloudstack module for Packer
https://developer.hashicorp.com/packer/integrations/hashicorp/cloudstack/latest/components/builder/cloudstack
but I have not tried it.
Best re
ord attribute. This
> way, CloudStack will attempt to connect to the host using the dynamically
> created certificate available at: /var/lib/cloudstack/management/.ssh/. It
> is necessary to configure the host in advance to accept connections using
> this certificate.
>
> Best regards,
&
at 10:34 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Join KVM host from CLI using only user and certificate
> EXTERNAL
>
> Hi Jordan,
>
> For the CLI (cmk), we support either username-password based
> authentication or API-secret key based authentication.
>
> C
Hello everyone,
I was exploring the host section of the CMK API reference but could not
find a way to add a host (KVM one) to Cloudstack using user + certificate
instead of user + password. Is such feature available?
Best regards,
Jordan
p;sa=D&source=hangouts&ust=1557908951423000&usg=AFQjCNGMxIuHSHsD3qO6y5JddpEZ0S592A
> >
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 6:53 PM jordan j wrote:
>
> > Hello Mosharaf,
> >
> > What is the operation that fails that ensures 443 is not working
>
r:
>
> https://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/releases/24.04/release-20240622/ubuntu-24.04-server-cloudimg-amd64.img
>
> What is your CloudStack version and hypervisors that you're using with it?
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Sent from Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
>
> From: jordan j
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 5:30:45 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: cloud-init fails on newer ubuntu?
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Currently I have
Hello Mosharaf,
What is the operation that fails that ensures 443 is not working
properly?
If that is a local upload of Image or ISO, that may be happening
because no trusted certificate has been configured.
Check this guide for specifics ->
https://www.shapeblue.com/securing-cloudstack-4-
Hi Vishnu,
Here are (probably) the same steps that I did to make my vm SSL working.
For this example I will use public range of 50.50.50.0 to 50.50.50.5
1. execute the following commands to enable ssl on the cloudstack server
using cloudmonkey
cmk update configuration name=consoleproxy.url.dom
Hi everyone,
Currently I have a test setup where these 4 OSs are tested with cloud-init
and Cloudstack 4.19.0.1 :
- Ubuntu 22 server - work!
- Ubuntu 24 server - does not work
- Ubuntu 22 desktop - does not work
- Ubuntu 24 desktop - does not work
The config script is the same on all 4 instances
Hi everyone,
To anyone that may face this issue, the problem is in terraform
parallelism when executing *for_each*.
As long as entities are listed manually the devices are attached as
expected.
Best regards,
Jordan
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 2:22 PM jordan j wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
&g
config parameter of
> either API (there's no GUI support just yet) deployVirtualMachine or
> updateVirtualMachine.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Gabriel Santos
>
> On 28/03/2024 08:39, jordan j wrote:
> > Dear community,
> >
> > Running ACS 4.17.2 + XCP-NG8.2.
>
Hi everyone,
We are using Cloudstack 4.19.0.1 with Debian12 KVM host as hypervisor. When
we try to create an instance (Debian12) with Terraform (version of provider
module 0.4.0), the additional disks are not being created in the specific
order we set:
resource "cloudstack_disk" "this" {
for_ea
Hi Wingrunt,
1. template can work alright without qemu-guest-agent on it but it is
advisable to use it.
2. You need only one system VM template for the hypervisor used. As long as
the console, ssvm and routers are started it means the deployment is fine.
I notice on my kvm setup I also have 2, the
Dear community,
Running ACS 4.17.2 + XCP-NG8.2.
Is it possible to enable nested virtualization for XCP-NG instances ?
When instances are created the hypervisor metadata is created dynamically
so there is no way to modify that in place.
Is there a config file that is responsible for custom settings
jordan j wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Running a 4.17.2 CS cluster with Advanced network with several guest
> networks that use the same network offering with the following services:
> - Security Groups
> - DHCP
> - User data
>
> Recently a conversation arose about whether
Hi everyone,
Running a 4.17.2 CS cluster with Advanced network with several guest
networks that use the same network offering with the following services:
- Security Groups
- DHCP
- User data
Recently a conversation arose about whether we may add a DNS to service one
of the networks. I I started
Yes SSVMs are on local SR as well.
Thank you Nux.
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 5:57 PM Nux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you are using local storage for system VMs as well, then (I am not
> sure 100%) this could be expected behaviour.
>
>
>
> On 2023-04-09 09:11, jordan j
Dear everyone,
Today I tried to migrate some SSVMs and VRs around to free a host.
Unfortunately all of them showed error :Failed to load hosts:
Request failed with error 431.
This is valid for all system vms only. User instances can be migrated
normally. I used a workaround by disabling a host an
eylalala
>
> Then do you stuff with cmk:
> cmk -c "$cmkconfig" list virtualmachines etc
>
> And when you are done just delete the file:
> rm -f "$cmkconfig"
>
> HTH
>
> On 2023-04-06 13:57, jordan j wrote:
> > Do you know if it is possible and wh
Do you know if it is possible and what is the syntax to use cloudmonkey
commands without configuring profile? I dont want to have credentials or
keys on the server disk.
Is it possible to do something like this?
cmk list instances -key my_key -secret my_secret
I see no such arguments in the docu
ble and I can only expunge it.
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Original Message ---
> On Friday, March 31st, 2023 at 8:55 AM, jordan j
> wrote:
>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Thank you Sina!
> >
>
> > By unsuccessful do you mean that CS allows the oper
with the following assumptions for your environment:
- the new IP range is in a new network created
- new users are part of separate account
You can make only the new network available for the new-users account so
during instance creation they cannot choose any of the already existing
ones.
One w
Another topic of interest that yesterday's tests spawned is "Local storage
matching".
Setup is ACS 4.17.2 with XCP-NG with local storage only (for VR and User
vms)
Here is an example:
there are 30 hosts that will be joined to a pool with the following local
storages:
- server 1-10 - have 1 ssd loc
Successful
>
>
> Third Round:
> Deploy 4GB ram on Node84 -> Successful
> Migrate VM-1 from Node84 to Node85 -> Successful
> Deploy 4GB (without specifying the host id) -> Unsuccessful, unable to
> create a deployment for VM instance
>
>
> Fourth Round:
Hey everyone,
This week we are doing performance tests on the environment and we noticed
something weird.
Setup:
- Cloudstack 4.17.2 + XCP-NG advanced network with SG.
- zone with 30 XCP hosts (in 30 clusters) each with 100 GB ram and 100 cores
- There is one compute offering with user dispersing
Hey Bram,
There is no log attached (attachments are unavailable in the mail list).
port 8250 is required for the system VMs to contact to the management
server so i dont think it is required for the cloudstack server to be
running.
I assume there is some other underlying issue that affects the ser
I have the same hardware setup and use the same configuration.
Not sure if one can run away from having multiple compute offerings for
each storage type and server group.
The only thing that reduced the amount of compute offerings is to set both
compute and disk offerings to be custom.
So actually
Thanks,
> Harikrishna
>
> From: jordan j
> Date: Monday, 20 March 2023 at 5:34 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: instance recreation with Terraform fails
> Hey everyone!
>
> Setup is 4.17.2 with XCP-NG - Advanced Zone + SG on local SR.
>
> While rec
Hey everyone!
Setup is 4.17.2 with XCP-NG - Advanced Zone + SG on local SR.
While recreating an instance on Cloudstack with Terraform, the job fails
with this error in Cloudstack logs:
2023-03-20 07:34:07,707 ERROR [c.c.u.s.SshHelper]
(AgentTaskPool-6:ctx-dbbda9d1) (logid:8d26a6f8) SSH execution
t;
> There is no argument for hostid in terraform code for Cloudstack
>
> Regards
> Kiran
>
> ____
> From: jordan j
> Sent: 20 February 2023 12:57
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Using terraform to spin custom insta
Hello everyone,
One more question regarding the Terraform provider.
When deploying a new instance, is it possible to select the resident host?
Regards,
Jordan
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:45 PM jordan j wrote:
> Works like a charm! :)
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:44 AM Steph
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
>
> I tested everything from SSVM:
>
> root@s-142-VM:~# telnet 2049
> Trying ...
> Connected to .
> Escape c
Will reply here instead.
>From the logs, it looks like the NFS cannot be mounted so I assume the
template check cannot be verified.
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to mount
IPAddress:/data/secondary at
/mnt/SecStorage/91de6d1c-4c04-359c-82b5-fdcfe4a83da7 due to mount.nfs:
ial
> and privileged for the private use of the named recipient. The contents of
> this e-mail may not necessarily represent the official views of Quadris.
> If you have received this information in error you must not copy,
> distribute or take any action or reliance on its contents. Please
in the log the following message can be seen.
2023-02-15 10:05:37,431 ERROR [o.a.c.c.p.RootCACustomTrustManager]
(pool-12-thread-1:null) (logid:) Certificate ownership verification failed
for client: defaultgatewaypublicIP
This means the certificate for the VM is not verified. Is the VM behind
so
Hey Gary,
One thing that comes to my mind is that the default Network offering limit
is 200 MBps.
You can check it from the GUI in the Network Offerings section.
Best regards,
Jordan
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 1:35 PM Gary Dixon
wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
>
> ACS 4.17.2
>
> Hypervisor KVM
>
>
>
> We are
if you have deleted the storage but there are isos left in the database,
you can disable/delete the entries directly from the db.
one of the places (for isos i think) is template_store_ref table.
Regards,
Jordan
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 9:01 AM Granwille Strauss
wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> I am busy
Hi Mev,
If you mean another guest SG enabled network the answer is yes you can.
Best regards,
Jordan
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 1:44 AM Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi Mevludin,
>
> What doesb"create a new Advanced Zone to an existing Zone with SG" mean ?
>
> -Wei
>
> On Thursday, 9 February 2023, Mevludin
nd it will work.
Regards,
Jordan
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 3:44 PM Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi Jordan,
>
> You may have missed some sentences in my previous reply.
>
> *forvirtualnetwork = false (for shared networks)*
>
> *allocatedonly = false (list all IPs including Free Ips, you
re the commands ?
>
> -Wei
>
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 14:09, jordan j wrote:
>
> > Just deployed a new advanced zone with SG and created a few networks
> based
> > on the DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService and that still shows
> empty
> > listPublicIpAddres
no public ip output.
Weird.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 12:53 PM Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi Jodan,
>
> listPublicIpAddresses works for me (in advanced zone with security groups)
>
> The two options you mentioned are not related I think.
>
>
> -Wei
>
> On Wed, 8 Feb
ublic. You can use the
> API "listPublicIpAddresses" to get a list of IPs.
>
>
> https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.17/apis/listPublicIpAddresses.html
>
> *forvirtualnetwork = false (for shared networks)*
>
> *allocatedonly = false (list all IPs including F
Hello everyone,
Has anyone used Packer to build images on CS?
I decided to try it out but it looks like it needs a public IP to access
the VM console and push the initial ISO installation config.
Unfortunately the setup I am working with does not create a public network
(by design - ACS 4.17.2 Ad
Hi Swen,
I will open one shortly today!
Regards,
Jordan
On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 10:23 AM wrote:
> Hi Jordan,
>
> can you please open an issue in github for the IP bug?
>
> Regards,
> Swen
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: jordan j
> Gesendet: Freit
After deploying ACS 4.17.2 with XCP-NG and Security groups we noticed that
by default egress port 53 is always allowed. Is there a way to deny that?
At first we thought it was allowed in the user network because the network
provider supported DNS service. However after removing the DNS service an
binlog-format = 'ROW'
>
> Regards
> Kiran
>
>
> From: jordan j
> Sent: 02 February 2023 13:24
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: understand Cloudstack Database performance
>
> During some analysis I noticed that
2000 and increased it to 5000.
However after CS reboot the amount of queries going to the database still
did not pass more than 2000.
Does anyone know where the value of the database query limit is?
Regards,
Jordan
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 2:58 AM jordan j wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> A
Hello everyone!
ACS 4.17.2 with a separate database. ACS currently has no vm instances.
While creating some /16 user networks we noticed some timeouts on the API.
After some tests - the smaller the new network the less the issues.
Checking the database - there were 600 slow queries on average.
T
; In my opinion, you can update the script to add firewall rules before
> getting userdata from DHCP/userdata server. then you do not need a static
> VR IP.
>
>
> -Wei
>
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 at 10:24, jordan j wrote:
>
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> >
Hey everyone,
ACS 4.17.2 - Advanced networking + Security groups
We found out that when a VM starts up there needs to be an egress rule
configured so userdata can be pulled successfully. Based on that the VR
should be a static network entity .
Is it possible when creating a network to assign spec
Hey everyone,
I spin a dev environment on my laptop but once the environment is up the
SSVMs cannot access the management server on port 8250, the SSVM logs
report handshake problems. Here is the setup:
ACS 4.17.2
Debian 11 + VMware Workstation 17:
1. vmnet10 - for embedded hypervisors and SSVMs
uot;
> service_offering = "custom"
> network_id = "c4a3303c-376d-4d56-b336-1bd91cb130b6"
> template = "d4c2f9c6-1d18-11ec-9173-50eb7122da94"
> zone = "d4a81f75-5d92-415e-ab59-e85cc2ce56d9"
> details = {"
Dear everyone,
I started playing with the Terraform provider. I noticed that there is no
way to choose custom resource values as my Compute Offering is custom. Is
there a way or that feature is not developed? Any advice is appreciated!
Regard,
Jordan
Hey everyone,
ACS 4.17.2 + XCP 8.2.1
I created a custom Network offering with SG based on the default one minus
DNS service.
After comparing the entries in the db I noticed they are not the same.
| 7 | DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService |
98bbf28f-3900-4efd-bbc2-458882fe56bb |
DefaultSha
Managed to test the case on 4.17.2.
The issue does not seem to be present anymore!
Best regards,
Jordan
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 12:26 PM jordan j wrote:
> I am on it, but it will take some time due to the conference next week.
>
> Regards,
> Jordan
>
> On Wed, Nov
2022-12-20 08:04:55,237 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(Work-Job-Executor-7:ctx-5298589d job-2783/job-2784 ctx-5325e481)
(logid:4c740aa8) Seq 36-1710804908447415280: Received: { Ans: ,
MgmtId: 66988330791812, via: 36(athena03.namhost.com), Ver: v1, Flags:
110, { CopyCmdAnswer } }
2022-12-20 08:04:55,241
Hey Granwille Strauss,
Can you upload a full log somewhere?
This error usually means there is another underlying issue even though it
says Network/interface scope.
Deployment for VM instance {id: "100", name: "i-2-100-VM", uuid:
"e0611ff1-cab5-48d0-ac4e-09fe0f034b19", type="User"}Scope=interface
Dear everyone,
Is there any way to specify SVM offerings to be used by a zone for Console,
Storage and VR system VMs?
I could not find anything in Zone -> settings.
The only available option is at Global settings - router.template.xen where
VR offering can be defined but that will be applied for
alright in regards to the example design post it seems i was wrong.
The traffic to cloudstack goes through the PODID interface so things are
fine there.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 10:55 AM jordan j wrote:
> And one more in regards to SSVM.
>
> If a new system vm (console or storage) of
?
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 8:13 AM jordan j wrote:
> By design, Cloudstack networks and user networks should be fully isolated.
> The problem is that as the Public network is not present the SSVMs user
> network interface takes the responsibilities of the public one. Here is an
> exam
Dear all,
I have the following setup.
ACS 4.17.1 + XCP-NG 8.2.1 with network bridge + Advanced network with
security groups.
Because Security Groups are enabled there is no public network in the zone
so instead system VMs use the user network. The setup has multiple such
networks so SSVMs use one
setup,
> just to check if some problem upgrading the UI components ?
>
> Thanks,
> Harikrishna
>
>
> From: jordan j
> Date: Tuesday, 8 November 2022 at 2:14 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: compute cannot be used if rot disk size is 0
> Good M
lowed
range. Max: 1024 Min:1"
4. uuidList: []
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 8:31 PM jordan j wrote:
> Disregard my last email.
> I will hold the tests tomorrow and provide data.
>
> Regards,
> Jordan
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 10:56 AM jordan j wrote:
>
>> Har
Disregard my last email.
I will hold the tests tomorrow and provide data.
Regards,
Jordan
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 10:56 AM jordan j wrote:
> Harikrishna,
>
> Tried to reproduce today but it seems there is some new issue, probably
> caused by the upgrade from 4.17.0.1 to 4.17.1 i d
y
> environment. I don’t think the way we save the details in the database has
> changed, not sure what is happening from UI front.
>
> Can you open the developers tools in the browser and capture the
> “deployVirtualMachine” API request params and send us, so that I can verify
> wi
Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 2:59 PM Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> Op 04-11-2022 om 09:30 schreef jordan j:
> > Yes CPU/RAM are fixed!
> >
> > Code for disk and service offering:
> >
> > createDiskOffering isMirrored=false name=custom-disk
> > displaytext
"rootdisksize": 0,
"storagetype": "local"
}
}
Regards,
Jordan
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 3:22 AM Harikrishna Patnala <
harikrishna.patn...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Can you please share the CLI list responses of the service offering and
> disk offering (fi
ding your environment to 4.17.1 ?
>
> Also I did not understand your scenario why rootdisksize comes to picture
> when diskoffering is mapped to a service offering ? Is that a custom disk
> offering ?
>
> Thanks,
> Harikrishna
> From: jordan j
> Date: Wednesday, 2 Nov
Hey everyone,
I found a bug (4.17.0.1).
if you try to create an instance from compute offering that has root disk
size = 0 the following error appears:
VM Creation failed. Volume size: -1GB is out of allowed range. Max: 1024
Min:1
A few examples when rootdisk size is set as 0:
- when compute off
ction-cloudstack/plugins/*/* - lists
all commands modules can execute
- grep 'createM' ansible-collection-cloudstack/plugins/*/* - has no output
So it seems that is not possible.
Regards,
Jordan
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 11:25 AM Wei ZHOU wrote:
> I think you need to
>
Hey everyone,
Working on an ACS config deployed via ansible using ngine_io.cloudstack
modules (https://galaxy.ansible.com/ngine_io/cloudstack)
I would like to deploy a secondary IP range in the management network only
for the use of system vms, is it possible to accomplish this via those
modules?
pt later
> for your automation.
> ---
> Nux
> www.nux.ro
>
>
> On 2022-10-19 09:02, jordan j wrote:
>
> Thank you Nux,
>
> That is fine as long as I can configure Advanced Zone + Security Groups,
> have one flat network and have a VR providing DNS, DHCP and USERDATA
roups.
>
> Please note, an advanced zone with SG will use flat networks and the VR
> does not do any routing or other advanced services - like load balanced,
> firewall etc.
> ---
> Nux
> www.nux.ro
>
>
> On 2022-10-18 13:26, jordan j wrote:
>
> Thanks Wei,
>
>
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 3:21 PM Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Hi jordan,
>
> There is a global configuration `vpc.max.networks` to manage it.
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Wei
>
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 at 14:15, jordan j wrote:
>
> > Thanks Nux,
> > Great thing i will play wi
AFAIK you can have a security group zone with XCP, though you must make
> sure you use bridges for your network, not openvswitch.
>
> ---
> Nux
> www.nux.ro
>
> On 2022-10-17 11:26, jordan j wrote:
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > Do you have any propos
Hey everyone,
Do you have any proposals for securing vms within the same network?
I know security groups feature is only available in KVM but we are
using XCP-NG for our ACS environment.
Best regards,
Jordan
ID of the old cached image
and delete it? How does ACS track and locate cached images?
Regards,
Jordan
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 3:38 PM jordan j wrote:
> Thank you! :)
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 3:08 PM Wei ZHOU wrote:
>
>> Hi Jordan,
>>
>> As said, you can fi
onding
> record from the database, cloudstack will copy the template from secondary
> storage to primary storage.
>
> -Wei
>
> On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 13:44, jordan j wrote:
>
> > I don't have ssl keys so i cannot import it.
> > Is there a better way to do i
not register the new template ?
>
> -Wei
>
> On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 11:02, jordan j wrote:
>
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > Looking for automated way to deploy VHD image as a template i have done
> > this:
> > - create a dummy template from VM
> &g
Hey everyone,
Looking for automated way to deploy VHD image as a template i have done
this:
- create a dummy template from VM
- change the dummy template VHD on the NFS with the VHD image i have
prepared
So far so good but as VMs are created, the template VHD is cached on the
hypervisor.
Now if
> Lastly, on the zone dashboard, my storage figures makes no sense. It
shows I have 3TB local storage and over 2 TB storage locations. But my two
servers are only 1 TB each. Where are these figures coming from?
Cloudstack is applying an overprovisioning factor of 2 on the storage. You
can change
using this? At this time we cannot upload templates, because
> they never seem to download.
> On 9/16/22 09:55, jordan j wrote:
>
> Cloudstack MGM server needs only 1 ip that is used:
> - for users to access GUI/API
> - for Cloudstack to contact the hypervisor
>
> So the answer i
correctly that it would be better to have bigger subnet,
> /28 on the KVM server and NOT on the Cloudstack MGMT server?
>
> The plan is to have Shared network + security group with full public IP
> space, not Private IP. Because we want to launch VPS that is publicly
> accessible.
>
Hi,
Should I assume that Server 1: Cloud MGMT is where Cloudstack management
server will be installed? so you will have one ip from 31.72.136.230/28 and
the rest will be unusable (as the KVM host will not have access to them).
Regarding Server 2: KVM (Plug public ip usable 5) 51.42.126.116/29 if
ep 14, 2022 at 9:42 AM jordan j wrote:
> I did some tests, if i make a zone with 1 physical interface (on bond with
> label bond02) and all networks are on it - management, public, guest - all
> is working fine.
> But when i have 2 physical interfaces (labels bond01 for guest and bond
quot;Creating VLAN 500 on host 172.16.14.105 on
device bond0" where i dont have such a device or label?
Could it be a bug? (v4.17.0.1 + xcp-ng 8.2.1 latest updates).
Regards,
Jordan
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 10:49 AM jordan j wrote:
> Here you go!
> https://filebin.net/fw07uwmlmjd0f1yp/manag
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
