users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Hi Rohit
I previous suggested these for 4.9.3.0
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs scheduled and
run twice on mgmt servers)
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring
)
Thanks
Sean
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 5:56 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
We'll accept bugfixes on 4.9 branch till end
ISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
I've started looking into reviewing/testing/merging of the PRs targeting 4.9+,
I'll share some plans around 4.9.3.0 soon. Meanwhile, help in reporting any
major/critical bugs and PRs we should consider reviewing/testing/merging.
Thanks.
- Rohit
ro
All,
I've started looking into reviewing/testing/merging of the PRs targeting 4.9+,
I'll share some plans around 4.9.3.0 soon. Meanwhile, help in reporting any
major/critical bugs and PRs we should consider reviewing/testing/merging.
Thanks.
- Rohit
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017 11:42
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
Please send me a list of PRs you
2017 11:42
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze
the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release
plan as soon
;
Sent: 12 July 2017 21:27:50
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
What would be very interesting would be to enable the KVM snapshot feature
live
Maybe this would be a barrier to breaking over the limitation of PODS KVM
vs. XEN
And it would be a re
nt: 12 July 2017 21:22:53
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Rohit
July 2017 01:27:30
> > To: Rohit Yadav; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
> >
> > Se
next week.
>
>
Support for XenServer 7.1 would be nice
> - Rohit
>
>
> From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
> Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
> To: Rohit Yadav; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: R
017 01:27:30
To: Rohit Yadav; d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Hi,
I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131
Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.
Wido
> Op 11 juli 2017
or sharing.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
>
> From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> He
Hi Sean,
Thanks for sharing.
- Rohit
From: Sean Lair <sl...@ippathways.com>
Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Here are three issues we ran into in 4
: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
All,
With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the
next minor LTS release
All,
With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the
next minor LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or
dates to share but I would like to engage with the community to gather list of
issues, commits, PRs that we should consider for
15 matches
Mail list logo
