Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack

2017-11-04 Thread Wido den Hollander
forward to this and 4.11! Wido > > Regards. > > > From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2017 12:08:59 PM > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] M

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack

2017-11-04 Thread Rohit Yadav
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack All, The PR has received enough reviews and (regression) testings to consider it for merging. I'll keep the PR open for few days to receive further reviews and additional testing.

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack

2017-11-01 Thread Rohit Yadav
Monday, October 30, 2017 4:55:55 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack All, The fatjar PR that aims at migrating to embedded Jetty is ready for review now: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2226

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack

2017-10-30 Thread Rohit Yadav
t 17, 2017 3:00:48 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Rohit Yadav; Cloudstack Users List Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack I have always been a big fan of fat, dependency-free binaries. Good work guys! rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com<http://ww

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack

2017-08-23 Thread Rohit Yadav
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Rohit Yadav; Cloudstack Users List Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack I have always been a big fan of fat, dependency-free binaries. Good work guys! rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack

2017-08-10 Thread Wido den Hollander
> Op 10 augustus 2017 om 14:09 schreef Rohit Yadav : > > > All, > > > Distro provided tomcat6/7/* has caused production issues for few users in the > past. Due to this, the ACS deployments are inconsistent with the version/jars > of tomcat in use. By allowing

[DISCUSS] Moving to embedded Jetty and fatjar CloudStack

2017-08-10 Thread Rohit Yadav
All, Distro provided tomcat6/7/* has caused production issues for few users in the past. Due to this, the ACS deployments are inconsistent with the version/jars of tomcat in use. By allowing exploded war to be shipped, can allow admins to sometimes overwrite cloudstack jars causing production