[VOTE] Upgrade Log4j to Log4j2

2023-05-16 Thread João Jandre Paraquetti
Hello guys, I am opening this voting thread as result of the discussion in thread "ACS upgrade to Log4J2 version 2.19"[1]. The voting aims to continue the efforts and conclude the upgrade of the ACS logging library to Log4j2 through PR 7131[2]; merge the PR as soon as possible and provide wa

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Log4j to Log4j2

2023-05-16 Thread Daniel Salvador
Hello, João Considering the discussion we had in the thread[1] and that the conflicts will be mostly regarding loggers names (which is simple to fix), I am +1 on the proposal. Best regards, Daniel Salvador (gutoveronezi) [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/261j7m0p5mr4q7yclvo49mwhkxz4yov2 On Tu

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Log4j to Log4j2

2023-05-17 Thread Felipe Rossi
+1 approve Att / Regards Felipe Rossi | BRASCLOUD *CEO - Founder* *Email:* fel...@brascloud.com.br | www.brascloud.com.br Contact + 55 45 99116-0094 / +55 45 3326-4568 [image: Mailtrack] Sender notif

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Log4j to Log4j2

2023-05-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
-0 Joao, Daniel reacted negatively to my question to create a proxy with bad arguments and I had no time to respond yet. I think not adding a proxy at this time is a missed opportunity and I would full heartedly +1 if we had. Not creating a proxy class (with or without configurability) is a waste

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Log4j to Log4j2

2023-05-17 Thread Rodrigo D. Lopez
Thanks for the great work! Based on discussions in PR and the discussion thread[1]. My vote is +1. Log4j v1 (deprecated) and its current alternative reload4j in use in ACS are not ideal for the long run. Therefore, for the future of ACS, and to enable us to keep evolving, the upgrade is most welc

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Log4j to Log4j2

2023-05-18 Thread Sidimar Carniel
Important effort in this work! [ ] +1 approve Regards, Sidimar Carniel Em qua., 17 de mai. de 2023 às 10:27, Rodrigo D. Lopez < rodrigoduartelo...@gmail.com> escreveu: > Thanks for the great work! > > Based on discussions in PR and the discussion thread[1]. My vote is +1. > > Log4j v1 (deprec

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Log4j to Log4j2

2023-06-05 Thread João Jandre Paraquetti
Hi all, This voting has been going on for quite some time already. In the meantime, more tests have been done and the PR has been verified as working with both mbx and BO. As we did not get any -1 votes, and achieved the minimum of three +1s, I will therefore close this vote and propose we p

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Log4j to Log4j2

2023-06-06 Thread Rohit Yadav
Jandre Paraquetti Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2023 01:36 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Log4j to Log4j2 Hi all, This voting has been going on for quite some time already. In the meantime, more tests have been done and the PR has been verified

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Log4j to Log4j2

2023-06-07 Thread João Jandre Paraquetti
/bylaws.html Regards. From: João Jandre Paraquetti Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2023 01:36 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Log4j to Log4j2 Hi all, This voting has been going on for quite some time already. In the