Hi,
On 18.07.19 03:08, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote:
> As for 4.11.2, no way to have multiple local storages configured for a
> single host. There is no simple way to overcome it. The only one I see is a
> pretty ugly - locally mounted NFS, created as a cluster wide storage when
> only a single host add
Shared mountpoint is ok
чт, 18 июл. 2019 г., 12:14 Fariborz Navidan :
> Hi
>
> I have already used this way. I feel local NFS mount point adds another
> layer over local storage and can affect IO speed and performance. What do
> you think of it? What about SharedMountPoint option? Between this an
Hi
I have already used this way. I feel local NFS mount point adds another
layer over local storage and can affect IO speed and performance. What do
you think of it? What about SharedMountPoint option? Between this and local
NFS which one offers better performance?
Thanks
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at
Hi,
As for 4.11.2, no way to have multiple local storages configured for a
single host. There is no simple way to overcome it. The only one I see is a
pretty ugly - locally mounted NFS, created as a cluster wide storage when
only a single host added to a single cluster...
In short, it's not suppo
Hello,
I have a few mount points which refer to different block devices on local
machine. I am trying to add them as additional primary local storage to
CS, Unfortunately, when adding primary storage there is no Filesystem
option to choose. As a result I have managed to modify the storage_pool
ta
