Wot he said ^^^
There as a Swiss based provider named CloudSigma (where I was one of their
customers loong time ago) - they were using Gluster (loong time
ago) and they had tremendous issues, reverting whole storage snapshots like
a week in the past - all of the sudden you/me see crazy lo
CEPH is much, much more used with Cloudstack than Glusterfs (from what I
see in the community).
As a product in itself it is arguably much, much more deployed than
Glusterfs.
I like Glusterfs, it's so simple to deploy and manage, but I'm afraid
it's the loser in this race.
hth
---
Sent from t
I'm not a cloudstack guy, but used CEPH and tested Glusterfs in openstack
environment
As a block point of view I recommend GlusterFs because of performance
Of course because of IO types or hardware types many things can depend but if
you are dealing with a lot of small io and want to get performa
Hi all,
In many documentation materials, I see CEPH mentioned but not Gluster.
Is CEPH support superior in cloudstack to gluster support?
Or is the performance of CEPH so much better than Gluster?
Thanks for your answers
Michael
P.S.: These mailing lists are not very searchable :(
signature.a
