t a lot more
> attention than Jira.
>
>
> - Si
>
>
>
> From: Jean-Francois Nadeau
> Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 11:32 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Host HA vs transient NFS problems on KVM
>
> I will fil
JF,
I suggest you open a github issue instead. It will get a lot more attention
than Jira.
- Si
From: Jean-Francois Nadeau
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 11:32 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Host HA vs transient NFS problems on KVM
I will
working automatic HA, I
> > agree, but it is far better to be woken up at 3am to deal with
> restarting a
> > handful of vms and perhaps a KVM host force reboot than dealing with mass
> > KVM hosts reboots and/or trying to find duplicate vms lurking somewhere
> on
> > the
ne that - NO THANKS!
>
> Cheers
>
> Andrei
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau"
> > To: "users"
> > Sent: Monday, 22 October, 2018 22:13:35
> > Subject: Host HA vs transient NFS problems on KVM
>
> >
ts and/or
trying to find duplicate vms lurking somewhere on the host servers. Been there,
done that - NO THANKS!
Cheers
Andrei
- Original Message -
> From: "Jean-Francois Nadeau"
> To: "users"
> Sent: Monday, 22 October, 2018 22:13:35
> Subject: Host H
Dear community,
I want to share my concern upgrading from 4.9 to 4.11 in regards to how the
host HA framework works and the handling of various failure conditions.
Since we have been running CS on 4.9.3 with NFS on KVM, VM HA have been
working as expected when hypervisor crashed and I agree
