From: Sanjay Kumar
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2025 05:42
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Can we use single primary nfs storage for ARM and AMD based architect?
Hello!
We are using 4.20.1 and I am expecting to use nfs primary storage on zone
then can we use a
Hello!
We are using 4.20.1 and I am expecting to use nfs primary storage on zone
then can we use a single primary storage for both architect like AMD and
ARM In 4.20.1, I found architect option on cluster level for AMD and ARM
however, template will be the same or different template for AMD/ARM.
Hi, I’m wondering if there are any possible way to migrate existing NFS
secondary storage to s3 base. Do you think it is fessible by patching each DB
record? Anyone have experience here can share your approach.
Thank you so much for your help.
Levin
This scheme can trigger HA
If you can, please provide remote login information. I can check it for you.
-邮件原件-
发件人: Cloud Udupi
发送时间: 2020年2月2日 3:24
收件人: users@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: Re: Redundant NFS Storage for ACS
Hi Jerry,
I have tried doing the same as you mentioned but still
Hi All,
Can some one suggest for the NFS Primary Storage for ACS, that does not
goes off due to NFS host failure in CentOS 7.6
Regards,
Mark.
y.
Do I need to do anything else to make the hosts to write all heartbeat
times to the KVMHA directory under NFS. (have no Idea about this)
Any specific steps to make it work.
And What if Primary NFS server holding heartbeat fails? Will it work with
another Primary NFS storage?
Regards,
Mark.
O
th the shared mount point being same.
> 2. NFS storage, as Apache CloudStack supports HA only with NFS.
> 3. I need to deploy around around 60 VM's for our application.
>
> If NFS storage having the VM's goes down and not able to get back. How to
> fix this, so that we can get back the VM's in running state.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
When the host fails, it detects the KVM heartbeat timestamp through Primary
Storage1 and triggers VM HA
-邮件原件-
发件人: Cloud Udupi
发送时间: 2020年2月1日 20:28
收件人: users@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: Redundant NFS Storage for ACS
Hi,
We are new to Apache CloudStack. We are looking for a Primary
. NFS storage, as Apache CloudStack supports HA only with NFS.
3. I need to deploy around around 60 VM's for our application.
If NFS storage having the VM's goes down and not able to get back. How to
fix this, so that we can get back the VM's in running state.
Regards,
Mark.
thing works great !
> > i wonder how the SR directory got renamed
> >
> > thanks
> > prashant
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Prashant s
> wrote:
> >
> > > Greetings !
> > >
> > > need help w
resolved,
>
> i moved the directory one level up ..now every thing works great !
> i wonder how the SR directory got renamed
>
> thanks
> prashant
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Prashant s wrote:
>
> > Greetings !
> >
> > need help w
this issue is resolved,
i moved the directory one level up ..now every thing works great !
i wonder how the SR directory got renamed
thanks
prashant
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Prashant s wrote:
> Greetings !
>
> need help with the NFS storage on xenserver .. ...
>
&
wrote:
> Greetings !
>
> need help with the NFS storage on xenserver .. ...
>
> there was a network outage , Few of my xenservers rebooted, after the
> reboot .. now
>
> looks like i have storage mount path issue , i have duplicate sub folder
> inside sr-uuid directory
Greetings !
need help with the NFS storage on xenserver .. ...
there was a network outage , Few of my xenservers rebooted, after the
reboot .. now
looks like i have storage mount path issue , i have duplicate sub folder
inside sr-uuid directory.
*all my vhd files are inside /var/run/sr-mount
06:09
To: CloudStack-Users
Subject: Re: NFS storage
Hi John,
Comments inline.
On 14-Jun-2014, at 4:08 am, John Muckley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can someone give me an overview of how the NFS storage works? Like what
> servers should have an NFS share mounted once a zone is enabled?
Hi John,
Comments inline.
On 14-Jun-2014, at 4:08 am, John Muckley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can someone give me an overview of how the NFS storage works? Like what
> servers should have an NFS share mounted once a zone is enabled?
There is no requirement to “manually” mount primary
Hi all,
Can someone give me an overview of how the NFS storage works? Like what servers
should have an NFS share mounted once a zone is enabled?
I’m using NFS for my secondary storage.
During deployment I mount the nfs share as /mnt/secondary and seed the template
to the secondary storage
Will do once I get back onsite
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2014 8:25 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Curtis old
Subject: Re: Primary NFS storage stuck in Maint. Mode
there should be button to cancel maintaince mode for Primary
hould I go in to the DB and flip it to up? How would I do
> that?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Curtis old [mailto:curtis@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 10:54 AM
> To: 'users@cloudstack.apache.org'
> Subject: Primary NFS storage stuck in Maint. Mod
Nobody??? Should I go in to the DB and flip it to up? How would I do that?
-Original Message-
From: Curtis old [mailto:curtis@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 10:54 AM
To: 'users@cloudstack.apache.org'
Subject: Primary NFS storage stuck in Maint. Mode
Guys I h
Guys I had a power outage in my lab. I'm using an Openfiler for NFS
storage and when the Openfiler came back online I had to run an "fsck" on
the Openfiler filesystem that hosts the primary storage for my CS 4.0 With
everything down but the management node I can't get it out
Thanks John and Krisstofer for your support.
Amin
> From: j...@stratosec.co
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Why no use sync rather than async for NFS storage?
> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:03:51 +
>
> Just created CLOUDSTACK-6166 to change this, or at least
Just created CLOUDSTACK-6166 to change this, or at least get a good reason for
why folks think it’s OK.
On Feb 24, 2014, at 8:57 AM, John Kinsella wrote:
> Interesting - hadn’t noticed that.
>
> Async is generally faster, at the risk of data loss as the client isn’t
> guaranteed data write on
Interesting - hadn’t noticed that.
Async is generally faster, at the risk of data loss as the client isn’t
guaranteed data write on the server. Not something I’d run in production.
John
On Feb 23, 2014, at 10:33 PM, Amin Samir wrote:
> Hello,
>
> All cloudstack documentation prepares the NFS
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org"
Subject: Why no use sync rather than async for NFS storage?
Hello,
All cloudstack documentation prepares the NFS share using async, why not
use sync for better data protection?
Has anyone used NFS shares with sync? what would be the drawbacks if a
Hello,
All cloudstack documentation prepares the NFS share using async, why not use
sync for better data protection?
Has anyone used NFS shares with sync? what would be the drawbacks if any?
Thanks for your valuable responses.
Amin
26 matches
Mail list logo
