users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
>
> The expectation is that in advanced zone we will be using private CIDRs.
> That's why it is not allowing. If you don't want to use NAT you can create
> shared network with your CIDR and deploy VMS in it O
al Message-
From: Sanjeev N [mailto:sanj...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 2:47 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
The expectation is that in advanced zone we will be using private CIDRs.
That's why it is not allowing. If you don't
The expectation is that in advanced zone we will be using private CIDRs.
That's why it is not allowing. If you don't want to use NAT you can create
shared network with your CIDR and deploy VMS in it
On Mar 27, 2015 9:25 PM, "Valdinei Rodrigues dos Reis" wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> My company has a pol
Hi Nux.
Thank you.
I will try it and give a feedback later.
Best regards.
Valdinei Rodrigues
n...@unesp.br
(11)5627-0467
- Mensagem original -
De: "Nux!"
Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Enviadas: Sexta-feira, 27 de março de 2015 13:41:14
Assunto: Re: Non-RFC1918 Gue
e março de 2015 14:07:10
Assunto: Re: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
Are you going to rely on users being able to make new networks, or will
they be created by an admin?
In the latter case you could just enter anything valid and use shared
networks.
Erik
Den fredag 27. mars 2015 skrev Valdinei Rod
Are you going to rely on users being able to make new networks, or will
they be created by an admin?
In the latter case you could just enter anything valid and use shared
networks.
Erik
Den fredag 27. mars 2015 skrev Valdinei Rodrigues dos Reis
følgende:
> Hi there.
>
> My company has a policy
gues dos Reis"
> To: "users cloudstack"
> Sent: Friday, 27 March, 2015 15:55:25
> Subject: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
> Hi there.
>
> My company has a policy anti-NAT, so I need to allocate public prefix for use
> in
> my guest network.
>
> The proble
Hi there.
My company has a policy anti-NAT, so I need to allocate public prefix for use
in my guest network.
The problem is that Cloudstack 4.3 does not allow a non-RFC1918 prefix in zone
creation.
What am i doing wrong? Or is a CS "feature"?
Thanks in advance and best regards.
Valdinei Rod
