Re: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

2014-03-20 Thread Marco Sinhoreli
+1 Marco Sinhoreli Consultant Manager Phone: +55 21 2586 6390 | Fax: +55 21 2586 6002 | Mobile: +55 21 98276 3636 Praia de Botafogo 501, bloco 1 - sala 101, Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - Brazil - CEP 22250-040 marco.sinhor...@shapeblue.com| www.shapeblue.com

Re: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

2014-03-18 Thread Nux!
On 18.03.2014 16:48, sebgoa wrote: +1 in general, I am not sure what would be best between libvirt and libxl though. but as you know there might be a quick path to reuse the KVM agent and use libvirt to interact with xenproject +1 XenProject +1 Reuse KVM/libvirt agent Good ideas! :) -- Sent

RE: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

2014-03-18 Thread Alex Hitchins
+1 Regards Alex Hitchins D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969 alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 March 2014 15:40 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Support pure Xen as a hypervisor

2014-03-18 Thread John Kinsella
+1 On Mar 18, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.commailto:tmac...@gmail.com wrote: Historically CloudStack has used Xen and XenServer interchangeably to refer to any XenAPI based implementation. With the recent release of Xen Project 4.4